Słowa kluczowe
fiction
realism
modernism
poetics
literary history
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
The article provides an innovative model of poetics (or isms, styles, etc.) in Czech prose in the latter half of the long 19th century. It gives an overview of seven individualized and mutually distinct poetics, including ideal, analytical, and psychological realisms, Parnassism, naturalism, impressionism, and decadence. The individual poetics do not represent periods, but exist in parallel, allowing confrontations and intersections either within the author's work or in a specific text, as in the model of Czech literature developed by Dalibor Tureček in the past decade. They are always set in the context of European literature and supported by many illustrative examples. The model is not only typological, but also assumes a diachronic perspective, which can be developed in future scholarly work on the history of Czech literature. The aim is to create a system that can potentially be applied not only to Czech fiction, but possibly also to poetry or drama, in other periods and literatures. Part One of the article concentrates on a general overview and on ideal and analytical realisms.
Bibliografia
Adorno, Theodor W. 2002. Aesthetic Theory, transl. Robert HulJot-Kentor. Continuum.
Brooks, Peter. 2005. Realist Vision. New York–London: Yale University Press
Doležel, Lubomír. 1973. Narrative Modes in Czech Literature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442653849
Fanger, Donald. 1967. Dostoevsky and Romantic Realism. A Study of Dostoevsky in Relation to Balzac, Dickens, and Gogol. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Furst, Lilian Renée (ed.). 1992. Realism. London–New York: Longman.
Furst, Lilian Renée. 1995. All Is True. The Claims and Strategies of Realist Fiction. Durham – London: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822377610
Hálek, Vítězslav. 2020. Básně a prózy (Poems and Prose), ed. Michal Charypar. Prague–Brno: Institute of Czech Literature of the CAS – Host.
Hrdina, Martin. 2015. Mezi ideálem a nahou pravdou (Between Ideal and Naked Truth). Realismus v českých diskusích o literatuře 1858–1891 (Realism in Czech Literary Discussions 1858–1891). Prague: Academia.
Koten, Jiří. 2020. Poetika narativního komentáře (The Poetics of Narrative Commentary). Rétorický vypravěč v české literatuře (The Rhetorical Narrator in Czech Literature). Brno–Prague: Host – Institute of Czech Literature of the CAS.
Lehan, Richard. 2002. “The European Background,” in Donald Pizer (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to American Realism and Naturalism. Howells to London, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 47–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521433002.003
Lehan, Richard. 2005. Realism and Naturalism. The Novel in an Age of Transition. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Nochlin, Linda. 1990. Realism. London etc.: Penguin.
Riffaterre, Michael. 1993. Fictional Truth. Baltimore–London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Röhrl, Boris. 2003. Kunsttheorie des Naturalismus und Realismus. Historische Entwicklung, Terminologie und Definitionen. Hildesheim–Zürich–New York: Georg Olms.
Shaw, Harry E. 1999. Narrating Reality. Austen, Scott, Eliot. Ithaca–London: Cornell University Press.
Schmid, Herta. 2014. “Pojetí historického vývoje u Jana Mukařovského a Michaila Bachtina” (The Concept of Historical Development in Mukařovský and Mikhail Bakhtin), transl. Lenka Kavalcová. In Ondřej Sládek (ed.), Český strukturalismus v diskusi (Czech Structuralism in Discussion). Brno: Host, p. 210–246.
Striedter, Jurij. 1989. Literary Structure, Evolution, and Value. Russian Formalism and Czech Structuralism Reconsidered. Cambridge–London: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674418677
Tureček, Dalibor. 2012a. “Synopticko-pulzační model českého literárního romantična” (The Synoptic-Pulsation Model of Czech Literary Romanticism). In Dalibor Tureček et al., České literární romantično (Czech Literary Romanticism). Synopticko-pulzační model kulturního jevu (The Synoptic-Pulsation Model of a Cultural Phenomenon). Brno: Host, p. 92–142.
Tureček, Dalibor. 2012b. “Synopticko-pulzační model českého literárního realismu - pracovní hypotéza” (The Synoptic-Pulsation Model of Czech Literary Realism - Working Hypothesis). In Dalibor Tureček et al., České literární romantično (Czech Literary Romanticism). Synopticko-pulzační model kulturního jevu (The Synoptic-Pulsation Model of a Cultural Phenomenon). Brno: Host, p. 265–282.
Tureček, Dalibor. 2018. Sumář. Diskurzivita české literatury 19. a 20. století (Summary. Discursivity of Czech Literature of the Nineteenth and Twentieth centuries). Brno: Host.
Tyňanov, Jurij Nikolajevič. 1988a. “Literární fakt” (Literary Fact). In Yuri Tynianov: Literární fakt, transl. Ladislav Zadražil. Prague: Odeon, p. 125–142.
Tyňanov, Jurij Nikolajevič. 1988b. “O literární evoluci” (On Literary Evolution). In Yuri Tynianov: Literární fakt, transl. Ladislav Zadražil. Prague: Odeon, p. 189–201.
Tyňanov, Jurij Nikolajevič. 1988c. “Puškin”. In Yuri Tynianov: Literární fakt, transl. Ladislav Zadražil. Prague: Odeon, p. 202–249.
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Michal Charypar
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.