Ключевые слова
fiction
realism
modernism
poetics
literary history
Как цитировать
Аннотация
The article provides an innovative model of poetics (or isms, styles, etc.) in Czech prose in the latter half of the long 19th century. It gives an overview of seven individualized and mutually distinct poetics, including ideal, analytical, and psychological realisms, Parnassism, naturalism, impressionism, and decadence. The individual poetics do not represent periods, but exist in parallel, allowing confrontations and intersections either within the author’s work or in a specific text, as in the model of Czech literature developed by Dalibor Tureček in the past decade. They are always set in the context of European literature and supported by many illustrative examples. The model is not only typological, but also assumes a diachronic perspective, which can be developed in future scholarly work on the history of Czech literature. The aim is to create a system that can potentially be applied not only to Czech fiction, but possibly also to poetry or drama, in other periods and literatures. Part Two of the article concentrates on psychological realism, Parnassism, naturalism, impressio- nism, and decadence.
Библиографические ссылки
Bednaříková, Hana. 2000. Česká dekadence. Kontext – text – interpretace [Czech Decadence. Kontext – Text – Interpretation], Prague: Centre for the Study of Democracy and Culture.
Fránek, Michal. 2015. “Zeyer, Vrchlický, Lier: česká próza v dotyku s parnasismem” [Zeyer, Vrchlický, Lier: Czech Prose in Contact with Parnassism], in Aleš Haman – Dalibor Tureček et al: Český a slovenský literární parnasismus [Czech and Slovak Literary Parnassism]. Synopticko – pulzační model kulturního jevu [The Synoptic – Pulsation Model of a Cultural Phenomenon], Brno: Host, p. 293–341.
Furst, Lilian Renée and Skrine, Peter N. 1971. Naturalism, London: Methuen & Co.
Haman, Aleš. 1969. K. M. Čapek – Chod a český naturalismus [K. M. Čapek – Chod and Czech Naturalism], Česká literatura 17, 1969, No. 4, p. 348–360.
Hobland, Wolfgang. 1991. Der Naturalismus in der tschechischen Literatur, München: Otto Sagner. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/b12980
Janáčková, Jaroslava. 1975. Arbesovo romaneto. Z poetiky české prózy [Arbes’ romanetto. From the Poetics of Czech Prose], Prague: Charles University Faculty of Arts.
Janáčková, Jaroslava. 1982. Svět Jiráskova umění [The World of Jirásek’s Art], Prague: Charles University Faculty of Arts.
Karásek ze Lvovic, Jiří. 1903. Impressionisté a ironikové. Dokumenty k psychologii literární generace let devadesátých [Impressionists and Ironists. Documents on the Psychology of the Literary Generation of the 90s], Praha: Hugo Kosterka.
Karásek ze Lvovic, Jiří. 1991. Gotická duše a jiné prózy [Gothic Soul and Other Prose], Praha: Vyšehrad.
Kociubińska, Edyta. 2006. Le dialogue avec le naturalisme dans l´śuvre de Joris – Karl Huysmans, Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe.
Lehan, Richard. 2002. “The European Background,” in Donald Pizer (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to American Realism and Naturalism. Howells to London, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 47–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521433002.003
Luc, Anne-Françoise. 1990. Le naturalisme belge, Bruxelles: Labor.
Markiewicz, Henryk. 1979. Aspekty literatúry [Aspects of Literature], trans. Pavol Winczer, Bratislava: Slovenský spisovateľ.
Med, Jaroslav. 1991. Ediční poznámka, in Jiří Karásek ze Lvovic, Gotická duše a jiné prózy [Gothic Soul and Other Prose], Praha: Vyšehrad, 1991, p. 243–244.
Med, Jaroslav. 2001. Česká symbolistně – dekadentní literatura [Czech Symboli- cally Decadent Literature], in Jaroslava Janáčková – Jaroslava Hrabáková (edd.), Česká literatura na předělu století [Czech Literature at the Turn of the Century], Jinočany: H&H, p. 73–92.
Moldanová, Dobrava. 1985. K. M. Čapek – Chod ve vývoji české prózy [K. M. Čapek – Chod in the Development of Czech Prose], Česká literatura 33, No. 3, p. 223–234.
Mrštík, Vilém. 2015. O naturalismu v umění [On Naturalism in Art, 1888], in Martin Hrdina, Mezi ideálem a nahou pravdou [Between Ideal and Naked Truth], p. 305–313.
Pelán, Jiří. 2015. Francouzský parnasismus [French Parnassism], in Aleš Haman – Dalibor Tureček et al: Český a slovenský literární parnasismus [Czech and Slovak Literary Parnassism]. Synopticko – pulzační model kulturního jevu [The Synoptic – Pulsation Model of a Cultural Phenomenon], Brno: Host, p. 38–93.
Procházka, Arnošt. 2020. Kritiky a eseje z let 1892–1924 [Critiques and Essays from the Years 1892–1924], ed. Luboš Merhaut, Praha: Institut pro studium literatury.
Pytlík, Radko. 1988. Na přelomu století. Soubor statí o vývojovém rytmu literatury let devadesátých [At the Turn of the Century. A Collection of Essays on the Rhythm of Development of 90s Literature], Praha: Československý spisovatel.
Röhrl, Boris. 2003. Kunsttheorie des Naturalismus und Realismus. Historische Entwicklung, Terminologie und Definitionen, Hildesheim – Zürich – New York: Georg Olms.
Stašek, Antal. 1908. Na rozhraní [On the Boundary] 2, Praha: J. Otto.
Tureček, Dalibor. 2015. Model, in Aleš Haman – Dalibor Tureček et al.: Český a slovenský literární parnasismus [Czech and Slovak Literary Parnassism], p. 98–129.
Urban, Otto M. (ed.). 2006. V barvách chorobných. Idea dekadence a umění v českých zemích 1880–1914 [In Sickly Colors. The Idea of Decadance and Art in the Czech Lands 1880–1914], Praha: Obecní dům – Arbor vitae.
Vojtěch, Daniel. 2008. Vášeň a ideál. Na křižovatkách moderny [Passion and Ideal. On the Crossroads of Modernity], Praha: Academia.
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2024 Michal Charypar
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — Без производных произведений») 4.0 Всемирная.