Society, Dispersed Knowledge and Uncertainty Toward Ethical Tales

Main Article Content

Przemysław Zonik
Joanna Zonik

Abstract

In this article the assumptions of one of the versions of the common good concept in terms of the dispersion of knowledge and uncertainty are analyzed. The article also aims at showing the consequences in regard to moral attitudes in politics and economics which are drawn on the basis of the concepts of this type. In the first part I expound the ontological assumptions which are the basis for the analysis. In the second part the concept of common good in terms ofits own assumptions and in relation to the ontology developed in this article is discussed. In the third part I consider some general thoughts about the structure of the ethical tales and their reference.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zonik, P., & Zonik, J. (2020). Society, Dispersed Knowledge and Uncertainty Toward Ethical Tales. ETHICS IN PROGRESS, 11(1), 99-119. https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2020.1.6
Section
Core topics-related articles
Author Biographies

Przemysław Zonik, independent researcher

Przemysław Zonik - holds a Ph.D. in Cognitive Science and Social Communication by Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Poland. His areas of interest are semiotics, cybernetics, mechanistic philosophy and their application in philosophy and social sciences.

Joanna Zonik, independent researcher

Joanna Zonik - holds a B.A. (Hons.) in Philosophy by Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Poland. Her areas of interest are logic, in particular: the application of logic in philosophy and social sciences.

References

  1. Anderson T. L., Benson B., T. E. Flanagan T. E. (Eds.) 2006. Self-determination. The Other Path for Native Americans. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  2. Benson B. L. 1989. „Enforcement of Private Property Rights in Primitive Societes: Law without Government,” The Journal of Libertarian Studies IX(1):1–26.
  3. Block W. E., Futerman A. G., & Farber R. 2016. ”The Legal Status of the State of Israel: A Libertarian Approach,” The Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law (June):435–553.
  4. Bocheński J. M. 1994. Bełkot [Gibber], in idem, Sto zabobonów [A hundred superstitions] (pp. 28–29). Kraków: Philed.
  5. Chamlee-Wright E. & Storr V. H. 2009. “’There’s No Place Like New Orleans’: Sense of Place and Community Recovery in the Ninth Ward After Hurricane Katrina,” Journal of Urban Affairs 31(5): 615–634.
  6. Chamlee-Wright E. & Storr V. H. 2010. ”Expectations of Government’s Response to Disaster,” Public Choice 144:253–274.
  7. Cohen G. A. 1995. „Self-ownership, World-ownership, and Equality,” in idem, Self-ownership, Freedom, and Equality (pp. 67–91). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Crean A. 2010. “Humean Humility,” Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy” 13:17–37.
  9. Czeżowski T. 1989. „Etyka jako nauka empiryczna” [Ethics as an empirical science], in idem, Pisma z etyki i teorii wartości (pp. 97–104). Warszawa: Ossolineum.
  10. Czeżowski T. 1965. Konflikty w etyce, in idem, Filozofia na rozdrożu. Analizy metodologiczne (pp. 121–129). Warszawa: PWN Editions.
  11. Dennett D. 2007. „What RoboMarry Knows,” in T. Alter & E. Walter (Eds.), Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge. New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism (pp. 15–31). New York: Oxford University Press.
  12. Falk D. 2016. “New Support for Alternative Quantum View,” Quanta Magazine/ URL: <https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160517-pilot-wave-theory-gains-experimental-support/>
  13. Friedman D. 1989 (Orig. 1970). The Machinery of Freedom. Guide to a Radical Capitalism. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
  14. Friedman D. 1994. ”A Positive Account of Property Rights,” Social Philosophy and Policy 11(2):1–16.
  15. Fuster J. M. 2013. The Neuroscience of Freedom and Creativity. Our Predictive Brain. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Glennan S. S. 1996. “Mechanisms and The Nature of Causation,” Erkenntnis 44:49–71.
  17. Glennan S. S. 2002. “Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation,” Philosophy of Science 69:342–353.
  18. Glennan S. S. 2005. “Modeling Mechanisms,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36:375–388.
  19. Glennan S. S. 2010. “Ephemeral Mechanisms and Historical Explanation,” Erkenntnis 72(2):251–266.
  20. Glimcher P. W. 2003. Decisions, Uncertainty, and the Brain. The Science of Neuroeconomics. London: The MIT Press.
  21. Gold J. I. & Shadlen M. N. 2007. “The Neural Basis of Decision Making,” The Annual Review of Neuroscience 30:535–574.
  22. Greniewski H. 1959. Elementy cybernetyki sposobem niematematycznym wyłożone [The elements of cybernetics explicated in non-mathematical way]. Warszawa: PWN.
  23. Gryziński M. 2002. Sprawa atomu. Warszawa: Homo-Sapiens.
  24. Hayek F. A. 1978 (Orig. 1969). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: China Social Sciences Publishing House.
  25. Hasnas J. 2008. „The Obviousness of Anarchy,” in R. Long & T. Machan (Eds.), Anarchism/Minarchism: Is a Government Part of a Free Country? (pp. 111–131). Aldershot: Ashgate Press.
  26. Kahneman D., Slovic P., & Tversky A. (Eds.) 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
  27. Keynes J. M. 2013 (Orig. 1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Klawiter A. 2004. ”Powab i moc wyjaśniająca kognitywistyki,” Nauka 3:101–120.
  29. Koj L. 1998. Powinności w nauce. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS Editions.
  30. Kossecki J. 2001. ”Relacja ‘prawda–fałsz’ w ilościowej i jakościowej teorii informacji,” The Peculiarity of Man 6:349–386.
  31. Kuhlmann M. & Glennan S. S. 2014. “On the Relation between Quantum Mechanical and Neo-mechanistic Ontologies and Explanatory Strategies,” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4(3):337–359.
  32. Lem S. 1964. „Modele i rzeczywistość”, in idem, Summa Technologiae (pp. 151–155). Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
  33. Long R. T. 2006. ”The Justice and Prudence of War: Toward A Libertarian Analysis,” Reason Papers 28:51–60.
  34. Łukasiewicz J. 1987. O zasadzie sprzeczności u Arystotelesa. Warszawa: PWN.
  35. Marx K. 2017 (Orig. 1875). Kritik des Gothaer Programms. URL: <https://marx-wirklich-studieren.net/2012/11/27/karl-marx-kritik-des-gothaer- programms/> (PDF, 36 Seiten).
  36. Minardi J.–F. 2017. Hong Kong: The Ongoing Economic Miracle. URL: <http://www.iedm.org/46514-hong-kong-the-ongoing-economic-miracle>
  37. Moyo D. 2009. Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There is Another Way for Africa. Suffolk: Penguin Books.
  38. Narveson J. 1997. ”Egalitarianism: Partial, Counterproductive and Baseless,” Ratio (New Series) X(3):280–295.
  39. Norton R. 2017. „Unintended Consequences,” in D.R. Henderson (ed), The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. URL: <http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/UnintendedConsequences.html>.
  40. Nozick R. 1999 (Orig. 1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. New Jersey: Blackwell.
  41. Pranke P. & Zečević M. 2016. Handel interregionalny od X do XII wieku. Europa Środkowa, Środkowo-Wschodnia, Półwysep Skandynawski i Półwysep Bałkański. Studium Porównawcze. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
  42. Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  43. Priest G. & Berto F. 2017. “Dialetheism,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring Edition), ed. by E. N. Zalta. URL: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/dialetheism/>.
  44. Shalins M. 2008. „Adams and Hobbes as Thucydideans,” in: idem, The Western Illusion of Human Nature (pp. 5–97). Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
  45. Strzelecki J. 2014. „Jakościowa teoria informacji a koncepcje prawdy [Qualitative Theory of Information and Conceptions of Truth],” Humanistyka i Przyrodoznawstwo 20:177–191.
  46. Sugden R. 2005 (Orig. 1986). The Economics of Rights, Co-operation and Welfare. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  47. Taleb N. N. 2001. Fooled by Randomness. The Hidden Role of Chance in the Markets and in Life. New York – London: Texere.
  48. Taleb N. N. 2007. The Black Swan. The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House.
  49. Tervo D. G. R., Proskurin M., Manakov M., Kabra M., Vollmer A., Branson K., & Karpova A. Y. 2014. “Behavioral 31 Variability through Stochastic Choice and Its Gating by Anterior Cingulate Cortex,” Cell 159(1):2–132.
  50. Tkaczyk M. 2014. “Grahama Priesta metoda uzasadniania tezy dialeteizmu,” Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne XXVII(2):23–35.
  51. Quine W. V. Q. 1961 (Orig. 1953). “Logic and the Reification of Universals,” in idem, From a Logical Point of View (pp. 102–129). New York, Hagerstown – San Francisco – London: Harper & Row Publishers.
  52. Warren J. 2011 (Orig. 1846). „Equitable Commerce,” in idem, The Practical Anarchist. Writings of Josiah Warren (pp. 54–98). New York: Fordham University Press.
  53. Waterman T. T. 1920. Yurok Geography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  54. Widerquist K. & McCall G. 2015. „Myths about the State of Nature and the Reality of Stateless Societes,” Analyse & Kritik 01+02:233–257.
  55. Varela F. 1999. Ethical Know-How. Action, Wisdom, and Cognition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.