Keywords
relational ontology;
living ontology
ecological crisis
How to Cite
Number of views: 0
Number of downloads: 0
Abstract
This paper aims to show to what extent the normativity of organic life that emerged from the natural sciences of Hegel’s time influenced the structuring of his speculative approach. In the first part, the eighteenth-century paradigm shift in the natural sciences is investigated as marking the transition from a physics-based worldview to a biology-based one. This shift argues strongly against the reduction of nature to mechanism and provides an adequate model for analysing the functioning of all other complex systems and, above all, the functioning of reason. In the second part, the consequences of such a shift are evaluated with respect to Hegel’s idealism, especially in relation to the categories of organism and purpose. They are the core elements for understanding not only the mode of living but also that of thinking. In the last part, we identify Hegel’s philosophy as a “living ontology,” an ontology that keeps pace with reality by modifying its categories accordingly. From this point of view, Hegel’s idealism can be compatible with a new idea of the relationship between human beings and the environment, in the direction of a relational ontology. The paper then focuses on the legacy of this re-reading of Hegel’s philosophy in the contemporary debate on ecological thinking that attempts to answer the question raised in the discussion on the environmental crisis and Anthropocene.
References
Achella S. 2022. “Idealism and Science of Life: An Intersection between Philosophy and Biology,” in N. Rezaei & A. Saghazadeh (Eds.), Thinking (pp. 111–131). Berlin – New York: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04075-7_5
Achella S. 2015. “Das Leben denken: Ursprung und Zweck in der Hegelschen Philosophie”, in W. Neuser & S. Lange (Eds.), Natur zwischen Logik und Geschichte. Beiträge zu Hegels Naturphilosophie (pp. 187–204). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Barad K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Biard J., Buvat D., Kervegan J.-F., et al. (Eds.) 1992. Introduction à la Science de la logique. Paris: Aubier.
Braidotti R. 2017. “Four Theses on Posthuman Feminism,” in R. Grusin (Ed.), Anthropocene Feminism (pp. 21–48). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Breidbach O. 1982. Das Organische in Hegels Denken. Studie zur Naturphilosophie und Biologie um 1800. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Burbidge J. W. 2014. “Hegel’s Logic as Metaphysics,” Hegel-Bulletin 35(1):100–115. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009067805
Cafagna E. 2020. Kant e la metafisica della forza. Un’interpretazione dei primi scritti. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.
Canguilhem G. 1966. “Le concept et la vie”, Revue Philosophique de Louvain 64(82):193–222. https://doi.org/10.3406/phlou.1966.5347
Cantillo G. 2013. “Il doppio rispecchiamento: ragione e vita nella logica hegeliana”, Teoria XXXIII:69–84.
Dagognet F. 1997. Georges Canguilhem. Philosophie de la vie. Paris: Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond.
Ferrer D. 2006. “La fonction systématique de l’idée de la vie dans la Science de la logique de Hegel”, Hegel-Studien 41:154–158.
Ferrini C. 2009. “Reason Observing Nature,” in K. R. Westphal (Ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit (pp. 92–135). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444306224.ch5
Foucault M. 2001. La vie: l’expérience et la science, in Idem, Dits et écrits II. Paris: Gallimard.
Friedman M. 2015. Kant’s Construction of Nature. A Reading of the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gambarotto A. & Illetterati L. 2014. “The Notion of Organism. Historical and Conceptual Approaches,” Verifiche XLII:1–4.
Giladi P. 2016. “Hegel’s Metaphysics as Speculative Naturalism,” in A. De Laurentiis (Ed.), Hegel and Metaphysics. On Logic and Ontology in the System (pp. 149–159). New York – Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110424447-012
Ginsborg H. 1997. “Kant on Aesthetic and Biological Purposiveness,” in A. Reath, B. Herman, & Ch. Korsgaard (Eds.), Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls (pp. 329–360). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527258.013
Giuspoli P. 2013. Idealismo e concretezza: il nuovo paradigma epistemico hegeliano. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Goethe J. W. 1964. Aufsätze, Fragmente, Studien zur Naturwissenschaft in allgemeine. Bearb. von D. Kuhn. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.
Gould S. J. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Grosz E. 2011. Becoming Undone: Darwinian Reflections on Life, Politics, and Arts. Durham: Duke University Press.
Hegel G. W. F. 2010. The Science of Logic, trans. by G. di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel G. W. F. 2001. Vorlesungen über die Logik, Berlin 1831. Nachgeschrieben von Karl Hegel, in H.-C. Lucas (Ed.), Vorlesungen. Ausgewählte Nachschriften und Manuskripte, Vol. 20. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Hegel G. W. F. 2004. Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature – Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences. Trans. by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegel G. W. F. 2006. Nürnberger Gymnasialkurse und Gymnasialreden (1808/1816), in K. Grotsch (Ed.), Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 1/1. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Hegel G. W. F. 2017. The Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. by T. Pinkard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel G. W. F., Schelling F. W. J., & Hölderlin F. 1987. “The Oldest Systematic Program of the German Idealism,” in Philosophy of German Idealism: Fichte, Jacobi, and Schelling. Trans. by E. Behler. New York: Continuum.
Illetterati L. & Gambarotto A. 2020. “Hegel’s Philosophy of Biology? A Programmatic Overview,” Hegel Bulletin 41(3):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2020.21
Ivaldo M. 2016. “Leben und Philosophie: Die Anweisung zum seeligen Leben als Antwort auf Jacobis Nihilismus-Vorwurf”, in M. V. D’Alfonso, C. De Pascale, E. Fuchs, & M. Ivaldo (Eds.), Fichte und seine Zeit. Kontext, Konfrontationen, Rezeptionen. Fichte-Studien 43:172–185.
Kant I. 2007. Critique of Judgment. Trans. by J. C. Meredith, revised, edited, and introduced by N. Walker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour B. 1991. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte.
Neuser W. 20172. Natur und Begriff. Zur Theoriekonstitution und Begriffsgeschichte von Newton bis Hegel. Cham: Springer.
Newton I. 1999. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Engl. translation by I. B. Cohen & A. Whitman, preceded by a Guide to Newton’s Principia by I. B. Cohen. California: California University Press.
Ng K. 2013. “Life, Self-Consciousness, Negativity: Understanding Hegel’s Speculative Identity Thesis,” in T. Khurana (Ed.), The Freedom of Life Hegelian Perspectives (pp. 33–68). Berlin: August Verlag.
Ng K. 2019. Hegel’s Concept of Life: Self-Consciousness, Freedom, Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sandkaulen B. 2019. “Der Begriff des Lebens in der Klassischen Deutschen Philosophie – eine naturphilosophische oder lebensweltliche Frage?”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 67(6):911–929. https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2019-0068
Schlanger J. 1995. Les métaphores de l’organisme. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Sell A. 2013. Der lebendige Begriff. Freiburg i. Br.: Karl Alber.
Stengers I. 1993. L‘invention des sciences modernes. Paris: La Découverte.
Wolfe Ch. T. 2004. “La catégorie d’«organisme» dans la philosophie de la biologie. Retour sur les dangers du réductionnisme”, Multitudes 2(16):27–40.
Wolfe Ch. T. 2013. “L’organisme: concept hybride et polémique”, in J.-J. Kupiec (Ed.), Une histoire critique de la biologie (pp. 267–281). Paris: Belin.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Achella Stefania
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.