Abstract
This paper sheds light on the intertwined aspects of gender, power, and emotion by exploring the lived experiences of Rohingya adolescent girls who are at risk of GBV which is widespread in camp settings. Narrative interviews and focus group discussions offered opportunities to twenty-five unmarried and married adolescent girls to talk about gender-based discrimination and violence in everyday household and community practices that reconstruct gender and power dynamics and shape girls’ emotions. Drawn from the elements of the three domains of power (Mcdonald, 1980), the paper shows that the prevailing sexist practices in Rohingya society divide “girls” and “boys” into two different categories and create conditions for subordination of girls on the basis of sex-based irrational differentiation. Such power capability rooted in the contexts of power bases put boys as a group in the position to use power in extreme form as violence and successful power use underlies power outcomes. Importantly, negative emotions such as sadness, fear, anger, guilt, and disgust interact with these three domains of power. Projects that define power as empowerment would be supportive for girls’ empowerment and experience of positive emotions.
References
AANAND, L. (2013) Feminist methodological approach towards focus group interview research. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 3 (9). Pp. 1–4
AINUL, S., EHSAN, I., HAQUE, F. E., AMIN, S., Rob, U., MELNIKAS, J. A., & FALCONE, J.(2018) Marriage and Sexual and Reproductive Health of Rohingya Adolescents and Youth in Bangladesh: A Qualitative Study. Dhaka: Population Council and UNFPA
ALLEN, A. (1998) Rethinking power. Hypatia. 13 (1). Pp. 21–40
ANDERSON, C. & KIRKPATRICK, S.(2015) Narrative interviewing. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
BATES, A. J. (2004) Use of narrative interviewing in everyday information behavior research. Library & Information Science Research. 26 (1). Pp. 15–28
BEAUDRY, A. & PINSONNEAULT, A. (2010) The other side of acceptance: studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on information technology use. MIS Quarterly. 34 (4). Pp. 689–710. https://www.jstor.org.stable/25750701
BOVONE, L. (1989) Theories of everyday life: a search for meaning or a negation of meaning? Current Sociology. 37 (41). Pp. 41–59
BROOK, T. (2009) The problem with polygamy Phylosophical Topics. 37 (2). Pp. 109–122. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43154559
CONNELL, W. R. (1985) Theorizing gender. Sociology. 19 (2): Pp. 260–272. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42853232
EINSPAHR, J. (2010) Structural domination and structural freedom: a feminist perspective. Feminist Review. 94. Pp. 1–19
FRASER, H. & TAYLOR, N. (2020) Narrative feminist research interviewing with ‘inconvenient groups’ about sensitive topics: affect, iteration, and assemblages. Qualitative Research. 1–16
FRASER, N. (1993) Beyond the master/subject model: reflections on Carole Pateman’s sexual contract. Social Text. 37. Pp. 173–181. https://www.jstor.org/stable/466266
Global Justice Center. (2018) Discrimination to Destruction: A Legal Analysis of Gender Crimes Against the Rohingya. New York: Global Justice Center: Human Rights through Rule of Law
GUGLIELMI, S., JONES, N., MUZ, J., BAIRD, S., MITU, K., & UDDIN, A. M. (2020) Age- and gender based violence risks facing Rohingya and Bangladeshi adolescents in Cox’s Bazar. Policy Brief, [Online] Available at: https://www.gage.odi.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Age-and-gender-based-violence-risks-facing-Rohingya-and-Bangladeshi-adolescents-in-Cox%E2%80%99s-Bazar-1.pdf [Accessed: 14 November 2023]
GUNNARSSON, L. (2016) The dominant and its constitutive other: feminist theorizations of love, power and gendered selves. Journal of Critical Realism. 15 (1) Pp. 1–20
HARTAS, D. (2019) The social context of adolescent mental health and wellbeing: parents, friends and social media. Research Papers in Education. Pp. 1–19
HÖKKÄ, P., VÄHÄSANTANEN, K. & PALONIEMI, S. (2020) Emotions in learning at work: a literature review. Vocations and Learning. 13. Pp. 1–25.
HOLLOWAY, K. & FAN, L. (2018) Dignity and the displaced Rohingya in Bangladesh. HPG Working Paper, London: Overseas Development Institute
ISCG (2019) Gender Profile No.2. For Rohingya Refugee Response Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh
Gender Equality and Social Inclusion Profile. [Online] Available at: https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/sites/www.humanitarianresponse.info/files/assess-ments/iscg_gender_profile_no._2_rohingya_refugee_response_30march2019.pdf [Accessed: 14 November 2023]
ISLAM, M. M. & NUZHATH, T. (2018) Health risks of Rohingya refugee population in Bangladesh: a call for global attention. Journal of Global Health. 8 (2). Pp. 1–4
IZARD, E. C. (2009) Emotion theory and research: highlights, unanswered questions, and emerging issues. Annu Rev Psychol. 60. Pp. 1–25
Joint Agency Research Report. (2018) Rohingya Refugee Response Gender Analysis: Recognizing and Responding to Gender Inequalities. Oxford: Oxfam GB
KARAKURT, G. & SILVER, E. K. (2013) Emotional abuse in intimate relationships: the role of gender and age. Violence Vict. 28 (5). Pp. 804–821
KOESTER, D. (2015) Gender and power. Development Leadership Program (DLP) conference brief, [Online] Available at: https://preventioncollaborative.org/wp-con-tent/uploads/2021/08/DLP_2015_Gender-and-Power.pdf [Accessed: 14 November 2023]
LAWLER, E. J. & PROELL, C. A. (2009) The Power Process and Emotion. In: D. Tjosvold, and B. V. Knippenberg (eds.) Power and Interdependence in Organizations. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 169–185
MADER, D. (2016) Theorizing agency and domination through a critical realistic perspective on gender positionality. Journal of Critical Realism. 15 (5). Pp. 440–457
MCDONALD, W. G. (1980) Family power: the assessment of a decade of theory and research 1970–1979. Journal of Marriage and Family. 42 (4). Pp. 841–854.
MCPHAIL, A. B. (2016) Feminist framework plus: knitting feminist theories of rape etiology into a comprehensive model. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 17 (3). Pp. 314–329
PANSARDI, P. (2012) Power to and power over: two distinct concepts of power? Journal of Political Power. 5 (1). Pp. 73–89
PANSARDI, P. & BINDI, M. (2021) The new concepts of power? Power-over, power-to and power-with. Journal of Political Power. 14 (1). Pp. 51–71
RAHMAN, S. M. & SAKIB, H. N. (2021) Statelessness, forced migration and the security dilemma along borders: an investigation of the foreign policy stance of Bangladesh onthe Rohingya influx. SN Social Sciences. 1 (160). Pp. 1–21
ROWLANDS, J. (1997) Questioning Empowerment: Working with Women in Honduras
UK and Ireland: Oxfam
SCOTT, W. J. (1986) Gender: a useful category of historical analysis. The American Historical Review. 91 (5). Pp. 1053–1075. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1864376
SOLOMON, C. R. & STONE, D. L. (2002) On “positive” and “negative” emotions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 32 (4). Pp. 419–435.
SULIMAN, N. N. (2019) The intertwined relationship between power and patriarchy: examples from resource extractive industries. Societies. 9 (14). Pp. 1–11
TAY, A. K., ISLAM, R., RILEY, A., WELTON-MITCHELL, C., DUCHESNE, B., WATERS, V., VARNER, A., SILOVE, D., & VENTEVOGEL, P. (2018) Culture, Context and Mental Health of Rohingya Refugees: A Review for Staff in Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Programmes for Rohingya Refugees. Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
TENHOUTEN, D. W. (2016) The emotions of powerlessness. Journal of Political Power. 9 (1). Pp. 83–121
UNDP. (2018) Impacts of the Rohingya Refugee Influx on Host Communities. Dhaka: UNDP
UNHCR. (2019) Global trends: forced displacement in 2018, https://www.unhcr.org/5d-08d7ee7.pdf
UNICEF. (2018) Evaluation of UNICEF’s Response to the Rohingya Refugee Crisis in Bangladesh. Evaluation Report. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nashida Ahmed

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Journal of Gender and Power is an Open Access Journal. Copyright of the article published in the Journal of Gender and Power is retained by the authors with first publication rights granted to the Adam Mickiewicz University Press.