Male homosexuality and homophobia in contemporary Slovakia: A qualitative inquiry into personal online narratives

Main Article Content

Srđan Mladenov Jovanović

Abstract

Homosexuality in Slovakia is covered in a veil of secrecy. With constant attacks by the Catholic Church and populist, traditionalist politicians, it is barely visible in society and politics, unless when discursively attacked. Similarly, homosexuality in Slovakia has failed to become a topic in the contemporary academia, with the exception of a few local works. This article, aiming to fill that gap, confronts a selection of online narratives of Slovak homosexuals via Qualitative Data Analysis through the qualitative tool, QDA Miner, including narrative analysis. Additionally, having in mind the strong propaganda of the Catholic Church against homosexuality, select homophobic narratives are analyzed via the same means.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jovanović, S. M. (2020). Male homosexuality and homophobia in contemporary Slovakia: A qualitative inquiry into personal online narratives. Journal of Gender and Power, 13(1), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.2478/jgp-2020-0006
Section
ARTICLES

References

  1. BALOGOVÁ, B. (2005) What is Slovakia’s stand on homosexuality? The Slovak Spectator. [Online] Available from: https://spectator.sme.sk/c/20025839/what-is-slovakias-stand-on-homosexuality.html. [Accessed: 1st April 2020].
  2. BARDIN, L. (2001) L’analyse de contenu. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  3. BENDA, V. & WILSON, P. (1985) Catholicism and politics. International Journal of Politics. 15 (3/4). Pp. 110–124.
  4. CANNELLA, G. S. (2015) Qualitative research as living within/transforming complex power relations. Qualitative Inquiry. 21 (7). Pp. 594–598.
  5. CERBONE, A. R. & DANZER, G. (2017) The Case of Abel: Religion as Boon and Bane for a Catholic Gay Man. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 73 (8). Pp. 985–991.
  6. CHO, J. & TRENT, A. (2006) Validity in qualitative research revisited. Qualitative Research. 6 (3). Pp. 319–340.
  7. CORBIN, J. & STRAUSS, A. (1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 19 (6). Pp. 418–427.
  8. ČTK. (2017) Slovakia: MP for fascist party criticizes recipients of state honors because of their origins and work. Romea.cz. [Online] Available from: http://www.romea.cz/en/news/world/slovakia-mp-for-fascist-party-criticizes-recipients-of-statehonors-because-of-their-origins-and-work. [Accessed: 1st April 2020].
  9. DAVIDSON, J., PAULUS, T. & JACKSON, K. (2016) Speculating on the future of digital tools for qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry. 22 (7). Pp. 606–610.
  10. DEROBERTMASURE, A. & ROBERTSON, J. E. (2014) Data analysis in the context of teacher training: code sequence analysis using QDA Miner. Quality & Quantity. 48 (4). Pp. 2255–2276.
  11. FRAWLEY-O’DEA, M. G. & GOLDNER, V. (2016) Predatory priests, silenced victims: The sexual abuse crisis and the Catholic church. Abingdon: Routledge.
  12. GLASER, B. (2017) Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research: Abingdon: Routledge.
  13. HAMPLOVÁ, D. & NEŠPOR, Z.R. (2009) Invisible religion in a “non-believing” country: The case of the Czech Republic. Social Compass. 56 (4). Pp. 581–597.
  14. HERETIK, A. & NOVOTNÝ, V. (2003) Homosexualita-psychopatológia, či politikum? Psychiatria. 10 (1).
  15. HESSE-BIBER, S. (2010) Qualitative approaches to mixed methods practice. Qualitative Inquiry. 16 (6). Pp. 455–468.
  16. HILLIARD, D. (1982) UnEnglish and unmanly: Anglo-Catholicism and homosexuality. Victorian Studies. 25 (2). Pp. 181–210.
  17. JONES JR, R. G. (2015) Queering the Body Politic: Intersectional Reflexivity in the Body Narratives of Queer Men. Qualitative Inquiry. 21 (9). Pp. 766–775.
  18. KEEFE, J. (2000) Kľúčové aspekty homosexuality. Acta Medica Christiana. Spravodaj Zväzu lekárov a zdravotníkov. Roč. 7, supl. 1. Bratislava: Charis.
  19. KOBES, T. (2011) Identifikace a praxe homosexuálů ve východoslovenských romských osadách: možnosti využití diskurzivní analýzy při analýze coming out stories. Working Paper No. 02–11. Západočeská univerzita v Plzni, Fakulta filozofická, Katedra sociologie.
  20. LATHER, P. & LATHER, P. A. (1991) Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/ in the postmodern. London: Psychology Press.
  21. LEWIS, R. B. & MAAS, S. M. (2007) QDA Miner 2.0: Mixed-model qualitative data analysis software. Field Methods. 19 (1). Pp. 87–108.
  22. LUŽNÝ, D. & NAVRÁTILOVÁ, J. (2001) Religion and secularisation in the Czech Republic. Czech Sociological Review. Pp. 85–98.
  23. MESTVIRISHVILI, M. et al. (2017) Exploring Homophobia in Tbilisi, Georgia. Journal of Homosexuality. 64 (9). Pp. 1253–1282.
  24. ONDRISOVÁ, S. et al. (2002) Neviditeľná menšina. Čo (ne) vieme o sexuálnej orientácii. Bratislava: Nadácia Občan a demokracia.
  25. PELIAS, R. J. (2015) A Story Located in “Shoulds” Toward a Productive Future for Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry. 21 (7). Pp. 609–611.
  26. PURNELL, D. (2016) Coming out (of the darkness). Qualitative Inquiry. 22 (6). Pp. 501–509.
  27. REYGAN, F. & MOANE, G. (2014) Religious homophobia: The experiences of a sample of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people in Ireland. Culture and Religion. 15 (3). Pp. 298–312.
  28. RIGGLE, E. D., ROSTOSKY, S. S. & REEDY, C. S. (2005) Online surveys for BGLT research: Issues and techniques. Journal of Homosexuality. 49 (2). Pp. 1–21.
  29. ROHAC, D. (2014) Slovak politics and gay rights. The New York Times. [Online] Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/31/opinion/slovak-politics-and-gayrights.html. [Accessed: 1st April 2020].
  30. ROSENMANN, A. & SAFIR, M. P. (2006) Forced online: push factors of internet sexuality: A preliminary study of online paraphilic empowerment. Journal of Homosexuality. 51 (3), Pp. 71–92.
  31. ROSIEK, J. L. & HEFFERNAN, J. (2014) Can’t code what the community can’t see: A case of the erasure of heteronormative harassment. Qualitative Inquiry. 20 (6). Pp. 726–733.
  32. SEALE, C. (1999) Quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry. 5 (4). Pp. 465–478.
  33. SEIDL, J. (2006) Pokus o odtrestnění homosexuality za první republiky. Magisterská diplomová práce na FF MU. Brno.
  34. SPOUSTA, J. (2002) Changes in religious values in the Czech Republic. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review. Pp. 345–363.
  35. ST. PIERRE, E. A. & JACKSON, A. Y. (2014) Qualitative data analysis after coding. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
  36. SUDDABY, R. (2006) From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal. 49 (4). Pp. 633–642.
  37. WALLACE-LORENCOVÁ, V. (2003) Queering civil society in Postsocialist Slovakia. Anthropology of East Europe Review. 21 (2). Pp. 103–110.
  38. WARD, K. (2015) The role of the Anglican and Catholic Churches in Uganda in public discourse on homosexuality and ethics. Journal of Eastern African Studies. 9 (1). Pp. 127–144.