Cross-border Objectification: Implications for the objectified women in the East

Main Article Content

Yagnamurthy Sreekanth

Abstract

Objectification theory says that females are socialized to think of their bodies as objects and to internalize an observer’s viewpoint of their bodies (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997). While feminist literature in developed countries is profuse with objectification of women within their national boundaries, they ignore the objectification committed against women of other countries, and especially the developing countries. Although, Nussbaum has extensively dealt with objectification, her analysis and much of the literature on objectification, document intra-national rather than international objectification, which I describe as cross-border objectification. In cross-border objectification, objectifier traverses one’s national boundaries to perpetrate objectification. I explain the cross-border objectification of women with the example of Thailand, a developing country, and how it is swayed by the developed world. The characteristics of cross-border objectification surpass the features of ‘objectification’ as they are defined in the west. Some of the specific characteristics observed as part of cross-border objectification are—providing alternate means and access to financial gains in order to exploit them; old men seeking unsustainable pleasure and company of young women; and finally, transitory emotional and non-sexual/sexual relationships, betraying social relationships of an enduring society. Further, it is exacerbated through the malicious circle of communication and transportation-beautification-objectification. The issue of cross-border objectification requires a special attention of the international community and largescale empirical researchers are necessary to investigate the nature of the problem and how remedial actions could be initiated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sreekanth, Y. (2019). Cross-border Objectification: Implications for the objectified women in the East. Journal of Gender and Power, 11(1), 79-87. https://doi.org/10.14746/jgp.2019.11.005
Section
ARTICLES

References

  1. BECKER, K. (2015) Women in Thai society: The Sexual Objectification of Thai Women and its Negative Effects on the Thai Emancipation Process. Thesis for BA International Studies. S1249258.
  2. COHEN, E. (1996) Thai Tourism-Hill Tribes, Islands and Open-ended Prostitution. Bangkok: White Lotus.
  3. DOLEZAL, C. (2015) The tourism encounter in community-based tourism in Northern Thailand: Empty meeting ground or space for change? ASEAS—Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies. 8 (2). Pp. 165–186.
  4. FELDHUSEN, M. (2008) The Social Life of Objects: Interpreting Our Material Culture. Art Education. 61 (6). Pp. 25–32.
  5. FREDRICKSON, B. L. & ROBERTS, T. A. (1997) Objectification Theory. Toward Understanding Women’s Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 21 (2). Pp. 173–206.
  6. GRUENFELD, H. D. et al. (2008) Power and the Objectification of Social Targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 95 (1). Pp. 111–127.
  7. KOEPSELL, R. D. (1999) Introduction to Applied Ontology: The Philosophical Analyses of Everyday Objects. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 58 (2). Pp. 217–220.
  8. MASON, A. (1999) Tourism and the Sex Trade, Industry in Southeast Asia. Totem: The University of Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology. 7. Iss. 1. Article 7. [Online] Available from: http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/totem/vol7/iss1/7 [Accessed: 15th December 2018].
  9. MONK-TURNER, E. & TURNER, C. G. (2017) Thai massage and commercial sex work: A phenomenological study. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences. 12 (1). Pp. 57–68.
  10. MONTGOMERY, H. (2008) Buying Innocence: child-sex tourists in Thailand. Third World Quarterly. 29 (5). Pp. 903–917.
  11. NUSSBAUM, C. M. (1995) Objectification. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 24 (4). Research Library Core.
  12. RE, M. (2003) The Global-Local Nexus of Western Male Sex Tourism in the South—a case study of Thailand, Lund University. Master’s Programme in East and Southeast Asian Studies Department of Political Science.
  13. SKULSUTHAVONG, M. (2016) ‘Thainess’ and Bridal Perfection. Thai Wedding Magazines. School of Journalism. Media and Cultural Studies Cardiff University.
  14. SUTAPA, A. (2017) Three megatrends to change the face of the Thai tourism industry. Insight, Economic Intelligence Centre. Pp. 4–46.
  15. TRUPP, A. (2014) Ethnic Tourism in Northern Thailand: Viewpoints of the Akha and the Karen. In: Husa, K., Trupp, A. & Wohlschlägl, H. (eds.) Southeast Asian Mobility Transitions. Issues and Trends in Tourism and Migration (pp. 346–376). Vienna: Department of Geography and Regional research, University of Vienna.
  16. VAN ESTERIK, P. (2000) Materialising Thailand. Oxford: Berg.
  17. WOAN, S. (2008) White Sexual Imperialism: A Theory of Asian Feminist Jurisprudence Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice Law. 13. Pp. 1–32.