Jak zmierzyć demokrację? Skale pomiaru demokracji politycznej stosowane w politologii porównawczej
PDF

Słowa kluczowe

pomiar
demokracja polityczna
politologia porównawcza

Jak cytować

SZEWCZAK, W. (2018). Jak zmierzyć demokrację? Skale pomiaru demokracji politycznej stosowane w politologii porównawczej. Przegląd Politologiczny, (1), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.14746/pp.2011.16.1.9

Abstrakt

The author reviews and characterizes the most important scales for measuring the democracy of political systems, applied in Western, mainly Anglo-Saxon, comparative political science. He refers to his article published in a back issue of Przegl¹d Polityczny, where the fundamental theoretical and methodological issues of democracy measuring were presented, and tries to indicate how these issues are dealt with by various researchers whose scales and data bases are most common and most frequently referred to in research into political comparative studies. The paper describes S. Huntington’s analyses, the Freedom House scale, the IDEA assessment of the quality of democracy, the EIU democracy index, Bollen’s scale, the Political Regimes Project, the Polity Project, T. Vanhanen’s democracy index and the scale of polyarchy by Coppedge and Reinicke. As the author analyzes one scale and database after another, he tries to identify their strengths and weaknesses, determine the most characteristic properties of each proposal, and assess their applicability in comparative analyses, pointing to their potential benefits and the threats of using them. In conclusion, he recommends caution in the selection of a scale to become a foundation for potential analyses, while he acknowledges that this theoretical and methodological tool is highly useful.
https://doi.org/10.14746/pp.2011.16.1.9
PDF

Bibliografia

Barman D. Ch., Rahman M. G., Siddiqui T., State of Democracy in Bangladesh, Momin Offset Press, Dhaka 2000.

Barro R. J., Determinants of Democracy, „Journal of Political Economy” 1999, vol. 107, Issue 6 Part 2.

Beetham D., Bracking S., Kearton I., Vittal N., Weir S., The State of Democracy. Democracy Assessments in Eight Nations Around the World, Kluwer Law International, Hague 2002.

Beetham D., Carvalho E., Landman T., Weir S., Assessing the Quality of Democracy. A Practical Guide, Stockholm 2008.

Bollen K. A., Issues in The Comparative Measurement of Political Democracy, „American Sociological Review” 1980, vol. 45, Issue 3.

Bollen K. A., Liberal Democracy: Validity and Method Factors in Cross-National Measures, „American Journal of Political Science” 1993, vol. 37, Issue 4.

Bollen K. A., P. Paxton, Subjective Measures of Liberal Democracy, „Comparative Political Studies” 2000, vol. 33, Issue 1.

Bollen K. A., Political democracy: Conceptual and measurement traps, „Studies in Comparative International Development” 1990, vol. 25, Issue 1.

Coppedge M., Reinicke W. H., Measuring Polyarchy, „Studies in Comparative International Development” 1990, vol. 25, Issue 1.

Dahl R., Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven 1971.

Dizdareviæ S., et al., Democracy Assessment in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Open Society Fund Bosnia an Herzegovina, Sarajevo 2006.

Eckstein H., Gurr T. R., Patterns of Authority: A Structural Basis for Political Inquiry, New York 1975.

Friedrich C. J., The evolving theory and practice of totalitarian regimes, w: Totalitarianism in Perspective: Three Views, red. C. J. Friedrich, M. Curtis, B. R. Barber, New York 1969.

Gasiorowski M. J., An overview of the political regime change dataset, „Comparative Political Studies” 1996, vol. 29, Issue 4.

Gasiorowski M. J., The Political Regimes Project, „Studies in Comparative International Development” 1990, vol. 25, Issue 1.

Gastil R. D., The Comparative Survey of Freedom: Experiences and Suggestions, „Studies in Comparative International Development” 1990, vol. 25, Issue 1.

Gurr T. R., Jaggers K., Moore W. H., The Transformation of the Western State: The Growth of Democracy, Autocracy, and State Power Since 1800, „Studies in Comparative International Development” 1990, vol. 25, Issue 1.

Gurr T. R., Persistence and Change in Political Systems, 1800–1971, „American Political Science Review” 1974, vol. 68, Issue 4.

Gutman A., Demokracja, w: Przewodnik po współczesnej filozofii politycznej, red. R. E. Goodin, F. Pettit, Warszawa 2002.

Hughers I., Clancy P., Harris C., Beetham D., Power to the People? Assessing Democracy in Ireland, New Island Books, Dublin 2007.

Huntington S. P., The Modest Meaning of Democracy, w: Democracy in the Americas: Stopping the Pendulum, red. R. A. Pastor, New York–London 1989.

Huntington S. P., Trzecia fala demokratyzacji, Warszawa 1995.

Inglehart R., Welzel Ch., Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: the human development sequence, New York 2005.

Jaggers K., Gurr T. R., Tracking Democracy’s Third Wave with the Polity III Data, „Journal of Peace Research” 1995, vol. 32, Issue 4.

Kekic L., The Economist Intelligence Unit’s index of democracy, „The Economist” 2006, nr specjalny: The World in 2007.

Landman T., Assessing the Quality of Democracy. An Overview of the International IDEA Framework, Stockholm 2008.

Linz J., Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes, w: Handbook of political science. Vol 3.: Macropolitical theory, red. F. I. Greenstein, N. W. Polsby, Reading (MA) 1975.

Marshall M. G., Jaggers K., Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2007. Data Users’ Manual, http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2007.pdf [10.01.2010].

McLaughlin S., Gates S., Hegre H., Gissinger R., Gleditsch N. P., Timing the Changes in Political Structures: A New Polity Database, „Journal of Conflict Resolution” 1998, vol. 42, no. 2.

Mouffe Ch., Paradoks demokracji, Wrocław 2005.

O’Loughlin J., Global Democratization: Measuring and Explaining the Diffusion of Democracy, w: Spaces of Democracy. Geographical Perspectives on Citizenship, Participation and Representation, red. C. Barnett, M. Low, London–Thousand Oaks–New Delhi 2004.

Pridham G., Vanhanen T. (red.), Democratization in Eastern Europe. Domestic and international perspectives, London–New York 2003.

Rozenvalds J., Meþaraups I. (red.), How Demorcatic is Latvia. Audit of Democracy, Latvijas Universitâte Akadçmiskais apgâds, Riga 2005.

Schumpeter J. A., Kapitalizm, socjalizm, demokracja, Warszawa 2009.

Shapiro I., Stan teorii demokracji, Warszawa 2006.

Stouffer S. A., Skalogram Guttmana, w: Metody badań socjologicznych, red. S. Nowak, Warszawa 1965.

Szewczak W., Jak zmierzyć demokrację? Teoretyczne i metodologiczne podstawy budowy skal demokracji politycznej w politologii porównawczej, „Przegąd Politologiczny” 2010, nr 4.

The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Index of Democracy 2008, „The Economist” 2008, nr specjalny: The World in 2009.

Tilly Ch., Demokracja, Warszawa 2008.

Vanhanen T. (red.), Strategies of Democratization, Washington–London 1992.

Vanhanen T., A New Dataset for Measuring Democracy, 1810–1998, „Journal of Peace Research” 2000, vol. 37, Issue 2.

Vanhanen T., Democratization. A comparative analysis of 170 countries, London–New York 2003.

Vanhanen T., Polyarchy Dataset Manuscript, document elektroniczny na stronie: http://www.prio.no/CSCW/Datasets/Governance/Vanhanens-index-of-democracy/Polyarchy-Dataset-Manuscript/ [17.01.2010].

Wilford R., Wilson R., Claussen K., Power to the People? Assessing Democracy in Northern Ireland, New Island Books, Dublin 2007.

http://www.freedomhouse.org [20.03.2010].

http://www.nd.edu/~mcoppedg/crd/datacrd.htm [15.02.2010].

http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm [10.01.2010].

Teksty opublikowane na łamach czasopisma "Przegląd Politologiczny" i udostępniane w formacie PDF objęte są licencją CC BY 4.0 (Creative Commons - Uznanie autorstwa). Kopiowanie i rozpowszechnianie dozwolone jest pod warunkiem uznania autorstwa.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.