Centrist Voices Online: Political Engagement and Polarization in the European Digital Sphere
Journal cover Przegląd Politologiczny, no. 3, year 2025
PDF

Keywords

political participation
online political engagement
centrist voters
social media
political polarization
European Social Survey (ESS)

How to Cite

Pawlak, P. (2025). Centrist Voices Online: Political Engagement and Polarization in the European Digital Sphere. Przegląd Politologiczny, (3), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.14746/pp.2025.30.3.17

Abstract

The choice of topic was dictated by the specificity of contemporary communication and political realities. In an era of significant and continuously growing presence of social media in social life, political debate is increasingly taking place via the Internet. At the same time, we are witnessing intensified phenomena of polarization, the brutalization of political discourse, and the spread of politically motivated hate speech. In such a context, the question of who actually sets the tone of today’s political debate becomes particularly important: are these voices of reason, or rather radical, emotional messages that more easily break through in an algorithmically determined information environment? The aim of this article is to identify which group within the political spectrum is most active in political debate conducted online, especially on social media. An additional point of interest is how engagement in the digital dimension of political debate correlates with electoral participation. Selected variables from the ESS 11 study, completed in November 2024, are used to answer these questions. This article is also motivated by a desire to identify the segment of moderate voters and their role in the digital sphere of public debate. In a sense, it represents an attempt to locate the centrist voter – one who declares moderate political views – in an era dominated by narratives of the prevalence of extreme positions.

https://doi.org/10.14746/pp.2025.30.3.17
PDF

References

800 mln euro kary dla Mety. Za nieprawidłowości w Facebook Marketplace, Bankier.pl, 2024, https://www.bankier.pl/wiadomosc/800-mln-euro-kary-dla-Mety-Za-nieprawidlowosci-w-Facebook-Marketplace-8845090.html, 9.03.2025.

Booth R. (2025), Meta to get rid of factcheckers and recommend more political content, “The Guardian”, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/07/meta-facebook-instagram-threads-mark-zuckerberg-remove-fact-checkers-recommend-political-content, 13.01.2025.

Boxell L., Gentzkow M., Shapiro J. M. (2024), Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization, “The Review of Economics and Statistics”, 106(2), pp. 557–565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01160

Buras P. (2025), Big tech, Donald Trump, and “techno-imperialism”: How Europe can avoid becoming a digital colony, “European Council on Foreign Relations”, https://ecfr.eu/article/big-tech-donald-trump-and-techno-imperialism-how-can-europe-avoid-becoming-a-digital-colony/, 4.05.2025.

Chudy B. (2024), Efekt Elona Muska? Masowy odpływ internautów z X. Zyskuje nowa platforma, Money.pl, https://www.money.pl/gospodarka/efekt-elona-muska-masowy-odplyw-internautow-z-x-zyskuje-nowa-platforma-7093682254986208a.html, 7.04.2025.

European Commission (2023), Commission welcomes political agreement on countering abusive lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP), https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_6159, 4.02.2025.

European Parliament (2024), Audiovisual and media policy, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/138/polityka-audiowizualna-i-medialna, 15.04.2025.

European Parliament (2024b), Turnout in the European elections, https://results.elections.europa.eu/en/turnout/, 8.04.2025.

Gerstlé J., Nai A. (2019), Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119861875

Habermas J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001

Hansen J. M. (2016), Mobilization, Participation, and Political Change, “European Journal of Political Research”, 55(1), pp. 1–18.

Leszczuk-Fiedziukiewicz A. (2019), Czy hejt i mowa nienawiści staną się normą? Społeczne uwarunkowania zachowań dewiacyjnych w Internecie, “Media – Kultura – Komunikacja Społeczna”, 3(14), pp. 99–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31648/mkks.2867

Pariser E. (2011), The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You, Penguin Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446431164

Pawlak P. (2016), Charakter dyskusji politycznej na portalach informacyjnych. Studium przypadku, “Studia Europaea Gnesnensia”, 13, pp. 201–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746//seg.2016.13.11

Pawlak P. (2024), Wyzwania dla mediów społecznościowych w kontekście rosyjskiej dezinformacji, “Studia Europaea Gnesnensia”, 26, pp. 145–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/seg.2024.26.6

Phillips W. (2018), The Oxygen of Amplification: Better Practices for Reporting on Extremists, Antagonists, and Manipulators, Data & Society Research Institute, https://datasociety.net/library/oxygen-of-amplification/.

Piwnik (2025), X (dawniej Twitter) – poznaj historię platformy, https://icomseo.pl/blog/%f0%9d%95%8f-dawniej-twitter-poznaj-historie-platformy/, 2.05.2025.

Przeworski A. (2019), Crises of Democracy, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671019

Poważne kłopoty Elona Muska. Chcą nałożyć potężną grzywnę na X (2025), “Business Insider”, https://businessinsider.com.pl/wiadomosci/elon-musk-moze-miec-powazny-problem-ue-chce-nalozyc-wielka-grzywne-na-x/sbcklew, 17.04.2025.

Roguski A. (b.d.), Kim jest influencer? Ile kosztuje współpraca z influencerami?, Whysosocial, https://www.whysosocial.pl/kim-jest-lider-opinii-trendsetter-i-influencer/, 14.01.2025.

Skotnicka S. (2019), Zjawisko hejtu w dyskursie publicznym, Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie, pp. 79–86.

Soroka S., Daku M., Hiaeshutter-Rice D., Guggenheim L., Pasek J. (2018), Negativity and Positivity Biases in Economic News Coverage: Traditional Versus Social Media, “Communication Research”, 45(7), pp. 1075–1096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217725870

Sunstein C. R. (2001), Republic.com, Princeton University Press.

Sztabiński P. (red.) (2016), Polska–Europa. Wyniki Europejskiego Sondażu Społecznego 2002–2015, Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN, Warszawa.

Tufekci Z. (2015), Algorithmic Harms Beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent Challenges of Computational Agency, “Colorado Technology Law Journal”, 13(2), pp. 203–218, https://ctlj.colorado.edu/?p=194.

Woźniak M. (2023), Popkulturyzacja polityki i polityzacja popkultury. Na przykładzie dyskursu politycznego w Polsce, Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, https://dspace.uni.lodz.pl:8443/xmlui/handle/11089/47342, 9.03.2025.

Związek Pracodawców Branży Internetowej (2024), Przewodnik po DSA, https://www.iab.org.pl/przewodnik-po-dsa/, 19.12.2024.