Słowa kluczowe
marginalizacja epistemiczna
Europa Środkowo-Wschodnia
stosunki międzynarodowe na Ukrainie
socjologia stosunków międzynarodowych
wojna rosyjsko-ukraińska
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
Mimo wzrostu zainteresowania Ukrainą po 2022 r. – także w obszarze stosunków międzynarodowych – tamtejsza dyscyplina Stosunków Międzynarodowych (SM) pozostaje w dużej mierze nieobecna w debatach o „narodowych dyscyplinach SM”. Autorzy stawiają pytanie, dlaczego rozwój SM na Ukrainie spotyka się z tak ograniczoną uwagą, i argumentują, że samorefleksyjny dyskurs dyscypliny konstruuje widoczność poszczególnych dyscyplin narodowych poprzez kryterium kulturowo-cywilizacyjnej egzotyczności. Kryterium to prowadzi do marginalizacji dyscypliny SM na Ukrainie. Aby naświetlić ten mechanizm, autorzy proponują koncepcję „złożonej peryferyjności”, która w bardziej precyzyjny sposób wyjaśnia procesy wykluczania w obrębie samorefleksyjnego dyskursu. Takie ujęcie pozwala nie tylko lepiej zrozumieć skalę pominięcia ukraińskiej dyscypliny w debatach nad „narodowymi dyscyplinami SM”, lecz także ukazuje ją jako przypadek kluczowy dla rozwoju „trzeciej fali” socjologii SM. W zakończeniu artykuł przedstawia program badawczy, który traktuje ukraińskie studia SM jako dyscyplinę czasu wojny, skupiając się na praktykach komunikacyjnych, trajektoriach kariery, adaptacji programów nauczania, zmianach bibliometrycznych oraz transnarodowej wymianie akademickiej w warunkach zewnętrznego szoku.
Bibliografia
Acharya A. (2014), Global International Relations (IR) and regional worlds: A new agenda for international studies, “International Studies Quarterly”, 58(4), PP. 647–659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12171
Alejandro A. (2021), Do international relations scholars not care about Central and Eastern Europe or do they just take the region for granted? A conclusion to the special issue, “Journal of International Relations and Development?, 24, PP. 1001–1013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-021-00245-9
Aluko O. (1987), The study of international relations in Nigeria, “Millennium”, 16(2), PP. 313–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298870160021001
Baele S. J., Bettiza G. (2021), ‘Turning’ everywhere in IR: On the sociological underpinnings of the field’s proliferating turns, “International Theory”, 13(2), pp. 314–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000172
Barthwal-Datta M. (2023), On in/visibility, “Journal of Critical Southern Studies”, 4, pp. 1–14, https://www.jstor.org/stable/48767440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3943/jcss.45
Bátora J., Hynek N. (2009), On the IR barbaricum in Slovakia, “Journal of International Relations and Development”, 12(2), pp. 186–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2009.7
Bayly M. J. (2021), Lineages of Indian International Relations: The Indian Council on World Affairs, the League of Nations, and the Pedagogy of Internationalism, “The International History Review”, 44(4), pp. 819–835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2021.1900891
Berg E., Chillaud M. (2009), An IR community in the Baltic states: Is there a genuine one?, “Journal of International Relations and Development”, 12(2), pp. 193–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2009.8
Breitenbauch H. (2013), International Relations in France: Writing between Discipline and State, Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203403167
Byk I. (2013), Mizhnarodni vidnosyny u Lvivskomu universyteti: istoriya i suchasnist, „Visnyk Lvivskoho Universytetu”, 32, pp. 3–9.
Corry O. (2022), What’s the point of being a discipline? Four disciplinary strategies and the future of International Relations, “Cooperation and Conflict”, 57(3), pp. 290–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367221098492
Czaputowicz J. (2012), Theory or Practice? The State of International Relations in Poland, “European Political Science”, 11(2), pp. 196–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2011.69
Do T. T. (2019), Between East and West: Japanese IR at a crossroads, “The Pacific Review”, 33(2), pp. 216–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2018.1559219
Drulák P., Königová L. (2002), The discipline of international relations in Central and Eastern Europe, “European Political Science”, 1(1), pp. 47–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2002.31
Dutkiewicz J., Smolenski J. (2023), Epistemic superimposition: The war in Ukraine and the poverty of expertise in international relations theory, “Journal of International Relations and Development”, 26, pp. 619–631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-023-00314-1
Ejdus F., Kovačević M. (2021), International relations (IR) in Yugoslavia and post-Yugoslav states, “Journal of International Relations and Development”, 24(4), pp. 932–959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-021-00236-w
Ersoy E. (2022), Epistemic hierarchies and asymmetrical dialogues in global IR: Increasing the epistemic gravity of the periphery through thematic density, Third World Quarterly”, 44(3), pp. 513–531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2022.2148522
Ferreira-Pereira L. C., Freire M. R. (2009), International Relations in Portugal: The State of the Field and Beyond, “Global Society”, 23(1), pp. 79–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820802556850
Gomza I., Koval N. (2019), The splendid school assembled: Studying and practicing international relations in independent Ukraine, “Ideology and Politics”. Foundation for Good Politics, https://ideopol.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/____ENG.%201.12.%20Koval%20Gomza%20%20FIN.pdf.
Haastrup T., Hagen J. J. (2021), Racial hierarchies of knowledge production in the Women, Peace and Security agenda, “Critical Studies on Security”, 9(1), pp. 27–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2021.1904192
Hendl T., Burlyuk O., O’Sullivan M., Arystanbek A. (2023), (En)Countering epistemic imperialism: A critique of “Westsplaining” and coloniality in dominant debates on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, “Contemporary Security Policy”, 45(2), pp. 171–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2023.2288468
Hoffmann S. (1977), An American social science: International Relations, “Daedalus”, 106(3), pp. 41–60, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024493, July 2, 2024.
Hollander P. (1998), Political pilgrims: Western intellectuals in search of the good society, 4th ed., Routledge.
Holsti K. J. (1985), The dividing discipline: Hegemony and diversity in international theory, Allen & Unwin, Boston.
Huggan G. (2001), The postcolonial exotic: Marketing the margins, 1st ed., Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203420102
Jørgensen K. E. (2014), After hegemony in international relations, or, the persistent myth of American disciplinary hegemony, “European Review of International Studies”, 1(1), pp. 57–64, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26593278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3224/eris.v1i1.19605
Khatri S. K. (2001), Teaching of international relations in Nepal, “Contributions to Nepalese Studies”, 28(2), pp. 139+, https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A92840364/AONE?u=anon~c4d3edb6&sid=googleScholar&xid=35ed9e09.
Kopiyka V. (2013), Kyivska shkola mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn, “Visnyk Lvivskoho Universytetu”, 32, pp. 10–17.
Krapivin O., Todorov I. (2013), Donetska shkola mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn, “Visnyk Lvivskoho Universytetu”, 32, pp. 18–25.
Kristensen P. M. (2017), Southern sensibilities: Advancing third wave sociology of international relations in the case of Brazil, “Journal of International Relations and Development”, 22, pp. 468–494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-017-0107-z
Kruhlashov A. (2013), Rozvytok yevropeiskykh doslidzhen v rehionalnykh naukovykh tsentrakh: pryklad Chernivtsiv, “Visnyk Lvivskoho Universytetu”, 32, pp. 32–39.
Kubálková V. (2009), The ‘take off’ of the Czech IR discipline, “Journal of International Relations and Development”, 12(2), pp. 205–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2009.10
Kushnir O. (2022), The great dichotomy: How experiences of history and transcendence explain Ukraine’s political life, “New Perspectives”, 30(1), pp. 119–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X211066449
Lagutina M., Sergunin A., Tsvetkova N., Antonova I., Ashmarina A., Bakhturidze Z., Bogoliubova N., Maslova E. A., Sevastianov S. (2023), The Routledge handbook of Russian international relations studies, eds. M. Lagutina, N. Tsvetkova, A. Sergunin, Routledge.
Lake D. A. (2016), White man’s IR: An intellectual confession, “Perspectives on Politics », 14(4), pp. 1112–1122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271600308X
Leira H., Neumann I. (2007), International Relations in Norway: The Emergence of a Discipline in the First Half of the 20th Century, “Internasjonal Politikk”, 65(1), pp. 141–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-1757-2007-02-02
Light M. (1989), The study of international relations in the Soviet Union, in: The study of international relations: The state of the art (pp. 229–243), eds. H. Dyer, L. Mangasarian, Palgrave-Macmillan, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20275-1_12
Lucarelli S., Menotti R. (2006), Italy, in: International relations in Europe: Traditions, perspectives and destinations (pp. 47–71), eds. K. E. Jørgensen, T. B. Knudsen, Routledge.
Makarychev A., Morozov V. (2013), Is “Non-Western Theory” possible? The idea of multipolarity and the trap of epistemological relativism in Russian IR, “International Studies Review”, 15(3), pp. 328–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12067
Makris S., Mikelis K. (2008), Discontent, but Also Blind? Understanding the Discipline of International Relations in Greece, “Études helléniques / Hellenic Studies”, 16(1), pp. 155–180, https://ejournals.lib.uoc.gr/hellst/article/view/634.
Maliniak D., Peterson S., Powers R., Tierney M. J. (2018), Is international relations a global discipline? Hegemony, insularity, and diversity in the field, “Security Studies”, 27(3), pp. 448–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2017.1416824
Mälksoo M. (2021), Uses of ‘the East’ in international studies: Provincialising IR from Central and Eastern Europe, “Journal of International Relations and Development”, 24(4), pp. 811–819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-021-00238-8
McMillan K. (2012), Beyond geography and social structure: Disciplinary sociologies of power in international relations, “Journal of International Relations and Development”, 15(2), pp. 131–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2011.31
Morozov V. (2009), Obsessed with identity: The IR in post-Soviet Russia, “Journal of International Relations and Development”, 12(2), pp. 200–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2009.9
Moshirzadeh H. (2018), Iranian scholars and theorizing international relations: Achievements and challenges, in: Widening the World of International Relations, 1st ed., pp. 21–21, Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.325790
Nymalm N. (2022), China’s rise and rethinking International Relations theory, “International Affairs”, 98(5), pp. 1785–1786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac175
O’Sullivan M., Krulišová K. (2023), Women, peace, and security in Central Europe: In between the Western agenda and Russian imperialism, “International Affairs”, 99(2), pp. 625–643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad021
Oyarzún-Serrano L., Fuentes-Julio C. (2023, March 22), The study of international relations in Chile, “Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies”, https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-755, August 28, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.755
Plokhy S. (2011), The “New Eastern Europe”: What to do with the histories of Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova?, “East European Politics and Societies”, 25(4), pp. 763–769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325411398914
Routledge (2024), Worlding Beyond the West [Book series], Routledge, https://www.routledge.com/Worlding-Beyond-the-West/book-series/WBW, June 22, 2024.
Said E. W. (1995), Orientalism, Penguin, London.
Seo J., Cho Y. C. (2021), The emergence and evolution of International Relations studies in postcolonial South Korea, “Review of International Studies”, 47(5), pp. 619–636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000504
Sidarchuk A. (2024), Commissioned Book Review: Andrei P Tsygankov, The ‘Russian Idea’ in International Relations: Civilization and National Distinctiveness (Worlding Beyond the West Series), “Political Studies Review”, 0(0).
Smith N. R., Dawson G. (2022), Mearsheimer, Realism, and the Ukraine War, “Analyse & Kritik”, 44(2), pp. 175–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2022-2023
Smith S. (2002), The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: “Hegemonic Country, Hegemonic Discipline”, “International Studies Review”, 4(2), pp. 67–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00255
Smoleński J., Dutkiewicz J. (2022, March 4), The American pundits who can’t resist “Westsplaining” Ukraine, “The New Republic”, https://newrepublic.com/article/165603/carlson-russia-ukraine-imperialism-nato.
Sondarjee M. (2023), Decentring the Western gaze in international relations: Addressing epistemic exclusions in syllabi in the United States and Canada, “Millennium”, 51(3), pp. 686–710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298231171615
Sonevytsky M. (2022), What is Ukraine? Notes on epistemic imperialism, “Topos: Philosophical-Cultural Journal”, (2), https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/what-is-ukraine-notes-on-epistemic-imperialism, July 18, 2024.
Tickner A. B., Wæver O. (eds.) (2009), International relations scholarship around the world, 1st ed., Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203885451
Tripathi S. (2021), International relations and the ‘Global South’: From epistemic hierarchies to dialogic encounters, “Third World Quarterly”, 42(9), pp. 2039–2054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1924666
Tsygankov A. P. (2022), Russian Realism: Defending ‘Derzhava’ in International Relations, Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003247647
Tsygankov A. P. (2023), The “Russian Idea” in International Relations: Civilization and National Distinctiveness, Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003377573
Tsygankov A. P. (2024), Russian Westernizers and Change in International Relations: The Promised West, Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003466123
Turton H. L. (2020), Locating a multifaceted and stratified disciplinary ‘core’, “All Azimuth”, 0(0), pp. 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.716725
Tyushka A. (2023), In ‘crisis’ we trust? On (un)intentional knowledge distortion and the exigency of terminological clarity in academic and political discourses on Russia’s war against Ukraine, “Journal of International Relations and Development”, 26(3), pp. 643–659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-023-00313-2
Vasilaki R. (2012), Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and prospects in post-Western IR theory, “Millennium”, 41(1), pp. 3–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812451720
Wæver O. (1998), The sociology of a not so international discipline: American and European developments in international relations, “International Organization”, 52(4), pp. 687–727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550725
Wemheuer-Vogelaar W., Peters I., Kemmer L., Kleinn A., Linke-Behrens L., Mokry S. (2020), The global IR debate in the classroom, in: International relations from the Global South, 1st ed., p. 21, Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315756233-2
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Artsiom Sidarchuk, Viktor Savinok
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.