Keywords
SNA
networks
research methods
coalition
How to Cite
Abstract
The main aim of the article is to argue the need for better focus of researchers conducting their research in the field of political science on some digital analytical tools used in social network analyses. Additional objectives are to outline the historical context of SNA’s development in this discipline, as well as to present possible fields of exploration and using of this method, both in basic and in applied research. Particular attention was paid to the potential of SNA in the study of the processes of cabinet coalitions formation, as well as to the important limitations of this method. The article was constructed as a methodological essay. We inevitably accept - because of its focus on network analyses a structural perspective on social reality. We verify the hypothesis that the greatest potential of SNA could be currently to create a visualization of social relations based on large data sets, but at the same time the most important barrier to the development of the method are limitations in the access to these data, which could be used as a basic analytical material for visualization of the network and generalization of the statistical conclusions. Presenting some political science research in Poland and around the world, in which SNA tools are used, we used the historical as well as the case study method.
References
Albert R., Barabasi A. L. (2002), Statistical mechanics of complex networks, “Reviews of Modern Physics,” vol. 74, pp. 47-97.
Atteveldt W. van (2008), Semantic network analysis: techniques for extracting, representing and querying media content, Charleston.
Bäcker R. et al. (2016), Metodologia badań politologicznych, Warszawa.
Banaś M., Zieliński M. (2015), Formowanie koalicji gabinetowych w perspektywie sieciowej Studium przypadku sojuszu PO-PSL z 2007 roku, Wrocław.
Barabasi A.-L. (2016), Network science, Cambridge.
Barabasi A.-L. (2003). Linked: The new science of networks, New York.
Bian J., Xie M., Hudson T. J., Eswaran H., Brochhausen M., Hanna J., Hogan W. R. (2014), CollaborationViz: Interactive Visual Exploration of Biomedical Research Collaboration Networks, “PLoS ONE,” vol. 9, no. 11.
Brandes U. (2001), A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality, “Journal of Mathematical Sociology,” vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 163-177.
Bright D., Whelan Ch., Harris-Hogan Sh. (2018), On the Durability of Terrorist Networks: Revealing the Hidden Connections between Jihadist Cells, “Studies in Conflict & Terrorism,” pp. 1-19, DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2018.1494411.
Butts T. C. (2008), Social network analysis: A methodological introduction, “Asian Journal of Social Psychology,” no. 11, pp. 13-41.
Cartwright D., Harary F. (1956), Structural balance: A generalization of Heider’s theory, “Psychological Review,” no. 63, pp. 277-292.
Dowding K. (1995), Model orMetaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach, “Political Studies,” vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 136-158.
Everett M. G., Borgatti S. P. (2014), Networks containing negative ties, “Social Networks,” no. 38, pp. 111-120.
Festinger L. (1949), The analysis of sociograms using matrix algebra, “Human Relations,” vol. 2, pp. 153-158.
Girvan M., Newman M. E. J. (2002), Community structure in social and biological networks, “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,” vol. 99, no. 12, pp. 7821-7826.
Granovetter M. (1985), Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, “American Journal of Sociology,” vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 481-510.
Hafner-Burton E. M., Kahler M., Montgomery A. H. (2009), Network Analysis for International Relations, “International Organization,” vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 559-592.
Hoppe B., Reinelt C. (2010), Social network analysis and the evaluation of leadership networks, “The Leadership Quarterly,” vol. 21, pp. 600-619.
Jaidka K., Saifuddin A., Skoric M., Hilbert M. (2018), Predicting Electionsfrom Social Media: A Three- Country, Three-Method Comparative Study, „Asian Journal of Communication,” pp. 1-21, DOI: 10.1080/01292986.2018.1453849.
Jarynowski A., Boland S. (2013), Rola analizy sieci społecznych w odkrywaniu narracyjnej struktury fikcji literackiej, „Biuletyn Instytutu Systemów Informatycznych,” vol. 12, pp. 35-42.
Johnson J. B., Reynolds H. T., Mycoff J. D. (2010), Metody badawcze w naukach politycznych, Warszawa.
Katz E., Lazarsfeld P. F. (1955), Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication, Glencoe.
Knoke D. (1994), Political Networks: The Structural Perspective, Cambridge.
Kolaczyk E. D., Csardi G. (2014), Statistical Analysis of Network Data with R, New York.
Kotylak S. (2011), Analiza sieci społecznych (SNA) jako narzędzie audytu rozwoju komunikacji społeczeństwa informacyjnego, „Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług,” vol. 67, pp. 161-168.
Lazer D. (2011), Networks in Political Science: Back to the Future, “PS: Political Science & Politics,” vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 61-68.
Leifeld P., Wankmuller S., Berger V. T. Z., Ingold K., Steiner C. (2017), Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network, “PLOS ONE,” vol. 12, no. 4, e0174671, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174671
Luke D. A. (2015), A User’s Guide to Network Analysis in R, New York.
McClurg S., Young J. (2011), Editors ’Introduction: A Relational Political Science, “PS: Political Science and Politics,” vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 39-43.
Newman M. E. J. (2005), A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks, “Social Networks,” vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 39-54.
Podejścia badawcze i metodologie w nauce o polityce (2013), eds. B. Krauz-Mozer, P Ścigaj, Kraków.
Prell Ch. (2012), Social Network Analysis. History, theory & methodology, London.
Putnam R. (2008), Samotna gra w kręgle, Warszawa.
Radcliffe-Brown A. R. (1952), Structure and Function in Primitive Society. Essays and Adresses, London.
Radcliffe-Brown A. R. (1957), A Natural Science of Society, Glencoe.
Robins G. (2015), Doing Social Network Research, Los Angeles.
Robbins S. M. (2010), Cash Flows: Leadership PACs in the U. S. Congress from 1992-2008, “2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences”, pp. 1-10, DOI: 10.1109/ HICSS.2010.96.
Salomon J.-J., Sagasti F. R., Sachs-Jeantet C. (1994), The uncertain quest: science, technology, and development, Tokyo-New York-Paris.
Scott J. (2013), Social Network Analysis (3rd ed.), Los Angeles.
Teoretyczne i metodologiczne wyzwania badań politologicznych w Polsce (2009), eds. A. Antoszewski, A. Dumała, B. Krauz-Mozer, K. Radzik, Lublin.
Teorie i metody w naukach politycznych (2006), eds. D. Marsh, G. Stoker, Warszawa.
The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks (2017), eds. J. N. Victor, A. H. Montgomery, M. Lubell, Oxford.
Varone F., Ingold K., Fischer M. (2018), Policy Networks and the Roles of Public Administrations, in: Swiss Public Administration, eds. A. Ladner, N. Soguel, Y Emery, S. Weerts, S. Nahrath, pp. 339-353, Cham.
Wasserman S., Faust K. (1994), Social network analysis: methods and applications, Cambridge-New York.
Wellman B. (1983), Network analysis: Some basic principles, “Sociological Theory,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 155-200.
Wellman B., Berkowitz S. (1988), Social structures: a network approach, New York.
Zygmunt A., Koźlak J., Krupczak Ł., Małocha B. (2009), Analiza blogów internetowych przy użyciu metod sieci społecznych, „Automatyka,” vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 673-681.
Żukiewicz P., Domagała K., Zieliński M. (2017), Coalition Formation Process in the Network Perspective: The Canadian Case, paper presented at the Annual Conference of the New Zealand Political Studies Association, 30.11.2017, Dunedin.