Fake news – preliminary analysis of the phenomenon
PDF (Język Polski)

Keywords

fake news
misinformation
fake news threats
good practices in sharing information

How to Cite

Tomaszewska-Michalak, M. (2021). Fake news – preliminary analysis of the phenomenon. Przegląd Politologiczny, (1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.14746/pp.2021.26.1.4

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of fake news and its potential impact on the functioning of democratic countries. The first part of the text discusses the problem of defining the term fake news. Nowadays there is no common understanding of the term fake news especially because it can refer not only to traditional (written) information but also to photographs or videos. Moreover the article highlights the danger of creating and distributing the misinforming content as it can have an influence on both: individuals and the whole society (e.g. it may have an impact on elections). In the second part, the article focuses on indicating solutions that are introduced in order to counteract fake news: such as educational campaigns and good practices in checking the information. The article points out also the most radical form of fighting against fake news namely the introduction of criminal sanctions for spreading disinformation. It is also highlighted that treating distribution of fake news as a crime may be a threat factor for democracy, especially for the freedom of speech. In order to analyse the phenomenon of fake news the theoretical research methods have been applied: analysis, synthesis and inference methods.

https://doi.org/10.14746/pp.2021.26.1.4
PDF (Język Polski)

References

Amnesty International, https://www.amnesty.org/en/.

A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation (2018), Report of the independent High level Group on fake news and online disinformation, European Commission.

Allcott H., Gentzkow M. (2017), Social Media and Fake News in The 2016 Election, „Journal of Economic Perspectives” 31 (2), ss. 211–236.

Bąkiewicz K. (2019), Wprowadzenie do definicji i klasyfikacji zjawiska fake newsa, „Studia Medioznawcze”, t. 20, nr 3 (78), ss. 280–289.

Fighting Fake News. Workshop raport (2017), The Floyd Abrams Institute for Freedom of Expression, Reporthttps://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/area/center/isp/documents/fighting_fake_news_-_workshop_report.pdf.

Grzegorzewski K. (2011), „Judenfrage”. Retoryczny obraz propagandy antysemickiej w III Rzeszy (na przykładzie publicznych wypowiedzi Adolfa Hitlera i innych polityków NSDAP w latach 1933–1945), „Folia Litteraria Polonica”, nr 14, ss. 141–153.

Honest Ads Act, S.1989 – 115th Congress (2017–2018), https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/1989/text.

Initiatives to Counter Fake News: China (2019), The Law Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/law/help/fake-news/china.php#_ftn6.

Internet World Stats (2019), Internet Usage Statistics, The Internet Big Picture, World Internet Users and 2020 Population Stats, https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.html.

Konstytucja Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki, http://libr.sejm.gov.pl/tek01/txt/konst/usa.html.

Lee T. (2019), The global rise of “fake news” and the threat to democratic elections in the USA, „Public Administration aand Policy: An Asia-Pacific Journal”, vol. 22, no. 1, ss. 15–24.

Mason L. E., Krutka D., Stoddard J. (2018), Media Literacy, Democracy, and the Challenge of Fake News, „Journal of Media Literacy Education”, 10(2), ss. 1–10.

Park. A, Youm Kyu H. (2018), Fake News from a legal perspective: The United States and South Korea compared, „Southwestern Journal of International Law“, 24, no. 1.

Pofma (2019), Protection form online falsehoods and manipulation act, no. 18 of 2019.

Quandt T., Frischlich L., Boberg S., Schatto-Eckrodt T. (2019), Fake News, in: The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies, eds. T. P. Vos, F. Hanusch, D. Dimitrakopoulou, M. Geertsema-Sligh. A. Sehl, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0128.

Reuters (2019), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-singapore-fakenews/singapore-invokes-fake-news-law-over-opposition-party-posts-idUSKBN1YI0DF.

Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General [2020] SGHC 25, Originating Summons No. 15 of 2020.

Statista (2019a), Most popular mobile internet activities according to internet users worldwide as of 2nd half 2017, by device, https://www.statista.com/statistics/249761/most-popular-activities-carried-out-on-mobile-internet-devices/.

Statista (2019b), Most likely sources of fake news stories in the United States as of January 2017, https://www.statista.com/statistics/697774/fake-news-sources/.

Statista (2020), Number of social media users worldwide (in bilions), https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users.

Synopsis report of the public consultation on fake news and online disinformation (2018), European Commission.

Tandoc Jr. E. C., Wei Lim Z., Ling R. (2017), Defining Fake News. A Typology of Scholarly Definitions, „Digital Journalism”, 6(3), ss. 1–17.

The International Fact Checking Network, https://www.poynter.org/ifcn/.

Ustawa z dnia 7.11.2016 r. o cyberbezpieczeństwie Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej, https://perma.cc/3HAP-D6MZ.