Abstract
This article examines the procedural and functional variations of the vote of no confidence across European political systems. It explores how this parliamentary tool serves as a critical mechanism for governmental accountability and political stability, enabling legislatures to express formal disapproval of a government or executive leadership. The article details different forms of no confidence votes, including the constructive vote of no confidence practiced in countries such as Germany, Spain and Poland where a motion must include an alternative candidate to replace the incumbent government. The article outlines procedural requirements – such as initiation thresholds, timeframes for consideration, voting majorities, and restrictions on repeated votes – intended to prevent misuse and maintain governmental stability. The consequences of a successful vote of no confidence traditionally include the resignation of the government or the dissolution of parliament and calling of early elections, thus subjecting political disputes to public judgment. The study also considers the complexities of votes of no confidence in mixed presidential-parliamentary systems, where the balance of power between president and parliament affects the efficacy of this parliamentary tool. The aim of the article is to identify the main types and forms of votes of no confidence used in different European countries, to highlight the differences in procedural rules and mechanisms for implementing votes of no confidence, and to analyze the limitations that affect the frequency and success of votes of no confidence in the government.
References
Austria. The Federal Constitutional Law of 1920 as amended in 1929, https://constitutionnet.org/sites/default/files/Austria%20_FULL_%20Constitution.pdf, 15.07.2025.
Basim Jana M., Rehmanb H., Alic A., Abdul Basitd M. (2023), The Law and Practice of Vote of No-Confidence Against Prime Minister: A Comparative Study of United Kingdom, India and Pakistan, “International Journal of Social Science Archives”, no. 6(3).
Bundesministerium der Justiz, https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/englisch_gg.html#p0420, Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany, 15.07.2025.
Constitution of 4 October 1958, https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/en/constitution-of-4-october-1958, 15.07.2025.
Constitution of the Portuguese Republic, https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/geral/en/relevant-legislation/constitution-of-the-portuguese-republic, 15.07.2025.
Damgaard E. (2003), Denmark: Delegation and Accountability in Minority Situations, in: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, edited by K. Strom, W. Muller, T. Bergman, Oxford University Press Inc., New York.
Engagements de responsabilité du Gouvernement et motions de censure depuis 1958, https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/decouvrir-l-assemblee/engagements-de-responsabilite-du-gouvernement-et-motions-de-censure-depuis-1958, 15.07.2025.
Jakubiak Ł. (2019), Prawne i polityczne uwarunkowania dymisji rządów we francuskiej praktyce ustrojowej okresu V Republiki, „Przegląd Sejmowy”, nr 3(152).
Kelly R., Powell T. (2010), Confidence Motions, Standard Note SN/PC/2873 of Parliament and Constitution Centre, 6 September 2010, https://www.parliament.uk/briefing.../SN02873.pdf, 15.07.2025.
Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, tekst uchwalony w dniu 2 kwietnia 1997 r. przez Zgromadzenie Narodowe, https://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/polski/kon1.htm, 15.07.2025.
Lento T., Hazan R. (2022), The vote of no confidence: towards a framework for analysis, “West European Politics”, no. 45(3).
Loi constitutionnelle n°95-880 du 4 août 1995 portant extension du champ d’application du référendum, instituant une session parlementaire ordinaire unique, modifiant le régime de l’inviolabilité parlementaire et abrogeant les dispositions relatives à la Communauté et les dispositions transitoires, https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/LEGIARTI000006527529/1995-08-05/, 15.07.2025.
Parliamentary Elections (2022), House of Commons Information, Office Parliamentary Copyright, London.
Prado V. (2019), Sfiducia costruttiva in Spagna? Constructive vote of no confidence in Spain?, “DPCE Online”, no. 37(4).
Règlement de l’Assemblée nationale, https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/divers/texte_reference/02_reglement_assemblee_nationale, 14.07.2024.
Sontheimer К. (1998), Grundzuge des Politischen Systems der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Piper-Bucherei, Munchen.
Spanish Constitution, Senate of Spain, https://www.senado.es/web/conocersenado/normas/constitucion/detalleconstitucioncompleta/index.html?lang=en, 15.07.2025.
Statute of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/160d0da110c511ee9ac6bb8cb9c06455?jfwid=-uhry5b2y, 14.07.2024.
The Belgian Constitution, https://www.dekamer.be/kvvcr/pdf_sections/publications/constitution/grondwetuk.pdf, 15.07.2025.
The Coalition: our programme for government. “Freedom. Fairness. Responsibility” (2010), Cabinet Office, Crown copyright, London.
The Constitution of the Republic of Hungary (1949), https://constitutionnet.org/sites/default/files/Hungary%20Constitution.pdf, 15.07.2025.
The Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia, https://www.varuh-rs.si/en/about-us/legal-framework/the-constitution-of-the-republic-of-slovenia, 15.07.2025.
Ustawa konstytucyjna z dnia 17 października 1992 r. o wzajemnych stosunkach między władzą ustawodawczą i wykonawczą Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej oraz o samorządzie terytorialnym, https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu19920840426, 15.07.2025.
Wieciech Т. (2010), Wotum nieufności w parlamentaryzmie westminsterskim, „Przegląd Sejmowy”, no. 6(101).
Zwierzchowski E. (2009), Rząd w systemie parlamentarnym RFN, „Przegląd Sejmowy”, no. 6(95).
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Svitlana Soroka

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
