THE STRATEGIC DIMENSION OF THE ERISTIC DIALECTIC IN THE CONTEXT OF THE GENERAL THEORY OF CONFRONTATIONAL ACTS AND SITUATIONS

Main Article Content

Bartosz HORDECKI

Abstrakt

This paper attempts to describe the strategic dimension of the eristic dialectic, which is frequently defined as the art of the dispute. This goal is embedded in reflections on the general theory of confrontational acts and situations. The text stresses the fact that strategic thinking about the art of discussion is not given sufficiently deep consideration. Another observation pertains to the fact  that the essence of the strategic design of discussions lies in the analysis of long-term results, which can be attained in the course of the exchange of arguments. At the same time, this analysis must not be limited exclusively to identifying the objectives of the discussion or the means of attaining them. Argumentative strategy also includes reflection on the side effects, both positive and negative, which may be the product of a specific communication practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
HORDECKI, B. (2018). THE STRATEGIC DIMENSION OF THE ERISTIC DIALECTIC IN THE CONTEXT OF THE GENERAL THEORY OF CONFRONTATIONAL ACTS AND SITUATIONS. Przegląd Strategiczny, (11), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2018.1.2
Dział
THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Biogram autora

Bartosz HORDECKI, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

PhD in law, PhD in Political science, MA in philosophy, assistant professor at the Faculty of Political Science and Journalism / Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. He specializes in researches in the field of changes of the contemporary sociopolitical discourses and political and legal cultures as well as the evolution of the key-concepts and rhetorical approaches in social communication, theory and practice of freedom of speech, and language politics and policies. Assistant editor of the “Public Policy and Economic Development” journal (publishers: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań; Black Sea State University in Mikolaiv); deputy-assistant editor and thematic editor (philosophy, ethics, professional deontology) of the “Medyczna Wokanda” journal (publisher: Naczelna Izba Lekarska); member of the Board of the Polish Academic Society for the Press Law, member of the IPSA-AISP RC50 Board (The Politics of Language/La politique des langues).

Bibliografia

  1. Aristotle, On Sophistical Refutations [translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge], https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/sophistical/book1.html.
  2. Bailey N. A. (1968), Toward a Praxeological Theory of Conflict, “ORBIS”, No. 11.
  3. Bondurant J. V. (ed.) in association with M. Fisher (2017), Conflict: Violence and Nonviolence, New York.
  4. Budzyńska-Daca A. (2014), Erystyka i etyka, „Poradnik językowy”, No. 1.
  5. Budzyńska-Daca A., Kwosek J. (2009), Erystyka czyli o sztuce prowadzenia sporów. Komentarze do Schopenhauera, Warszawa.
  6. Chilcote R. H. (2018), Theories of Comparative Politics: The Search For A Paradigm Reconsidered, New York.
  7. Hordecki (2009), Retoryka i erystyka w systemie kształcenia polskiej kultury politycznej, „Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne”, No. 4.
  8. Ingarden R. (1998), O dyskusji owocnej słów kilka, w: idem, Książeczka o człowieku, Kraków.
  9. Kampka A. (2013), Retoryka wizualna w sporach, „Forum Artis Rhetoricae”, No. 3.
  10. Kampka A. (2014), Debata publiczna, Warszawa.
  11. Kochan M. (2005), Pojedynek na słowa. Techniki erystyczne w publicznych sporach, Kraków.
  12. Kotarbiński T. (1973), Przedmowa, in: A. Schopenhauer, Erystyka czyli sztuka prowadzenia sporów, Kraków.
  13. Lewiński P. H. (2012), Neosofistyka. Argumentacja retoryczna w komunikacji potocznej, Wrocław.
  14. Min Liu (2016), The New Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument in Today’s World, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
  15. Schopenhauer A. (1973), Erystyka czyli sztuka prowadzenia sporów, Kraków.
  16. Schopenhauer A. (2014), Eristische Dialektik: Die Kunst, Recht zu behalten, e-artnow.
  17. Schopenhauer A. (ed. and intr. by A. C. Grayling, 2014), The Art of Always Being Right: Thirty Eight Ways to Win When You Are Defeated, Gibson Square.
  18. Schopenhauer A. (2008), The Art of Controversy, transl. by T. Bailey Saunders, (ed.) A. Wendelberger, Megaphone eBooks.
  19. Schopenhauer A., The Art of Being Right, transl. T. Bailey Saunders, https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Art_of_Being_Right.
  20. Szymanek K., Wieczorek K. A., Wójcik A. S., Sztuka argumentacji. Ćwiczenia w badaniu argumentów, Warszawa.
  21. The New Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument in Today’s World (advert), https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-New-Art-of-Being-Right-38-Ways-to-Win-an-Argument-in-Todays-World/1738543546393102.
  22. Walton D. (2006), Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation, New York.
  23. Walton D. (1998), Ad Hominem Argument, Tuscaloosa-London.
  24. Walton D. (1998), The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument, Toronto–Bufallo–London.
  25. Walton D. (1999), One-Sided Arguments. A Dialectical Analysis of Bias, New York.
  26. Walton D. (2013), Methods of Argumentation, New York.
  27. Walton D. (2014), Abductive Reasoning, Tuscaloosa.