Greenland – from Autonomy to (In)Dependence

Main Article Content

Tomasz BRAŃKA

Abstrakt

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the process of development of Greenland’s autonomy, especially vis-à-vis the Act on Greenland Self-Government of 2009, which ensures that decisions on the future status of the island will be made by the people of Greenland. Compared to other entities, Greenland is the only Arctic territory which can feasibly gain independence. This study also discusses the relations between Denmark and Greenland in terms of post-colonial relations between the former metropolis/colonizer and the island, outlining also the discourse on independence in Greenland. The hypothesis posed in the paper is that the proceeds from mineral extraction will not enable Greenland to become economically independent and abandon Danish subsidies, and that the process of gaining sovereignty might result in Greenland becoming dependent on external powers which will have a considerable impact on social relations on the island. This means that the matter under negotiation is not so much whether or not Greenland has the right to declare independence, but rather if it should take this step.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
BRAŃKA, T. (2018). Greenland – from Autonomy to (In)Dependence. Przegląd Strategiczny, (11), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2018.1.8
Dział
SECURITY IN INTERNATIONAL AND INTERNAL DIMENSION

Bibliografia

  1. Act on Greenland Self-Government (2009), http://naalakkersuisut.gl/~/media/Nanoq/Files/Attached%20Files/Engelske-tekster/Act%20on%20Greenland.pdf (21.11.2017).
  2. Auchet M. (2011), Greenland at the Crossroads. What Strategy for the Arctic?, “International Journal”, Vol. 66, No. 4, https://doi.org/10.1177/002070201106600420.
  3. Boersma T., Foley K. (2014), The Greenland gold rush: promises and pitfalls of Greenland’s energy and mineral resources, Washington, Brookings Institution, http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/reports/2014/09/24-greenland-energy-mineralresources-boersmafoley/24-greenland-energy-mineral-resources-boersma-foley-pdf-2.pdf (18.12.2016).
  4. Borgerson S. (2013), The Coming Arctic Boom: As the Ice Melts, the Region Heats Up, “Foreign Affairs”, Vol. 92, No. 4.
  5. Brańka T. (2007), Status terytorium zamorskiego Wspólnot Europejskich na przykładzie Grenlandi, „Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej”, No. 1.
  6. Brańka T. (2012), Geopolityczny status Królestwa Danii – mit państwa unitarnego, “Przegląd Politologiczny”, No. 4.
  7. Breum M. (2015), The Greenland dilemma. The quest for independence, the underground riches and the trobled relations with Denmark, Royal Danish Defence College, Copenhagen.
  8. Breum M. (2016), Independence and stability are top priorities for Greenland’s new government, “Arctic Now”, https://www.arcticnow.com/voices/analysis/2016/11/02/independence-andstability-are-top-priorities-for-greenlands-new-government/ (01.12.2016).
  9. Coalition Agreement 2016–2018 (2016), http://naalakkersuisut.gl/~/media/Nanoq/Files/Attached%20Files/Naalakkersuisut/DK/Koalitionsaftaler/Koalitionsaftale_S_IA_PN_eng.pdf (01.12.2017).
  10. Crouch D. (2013), Centre left narrowly wins Greenland election, “The Financial Times”, https://www.ft.com/content/bc3693ce-77bb-11e4-9f13-00144feabdc0 (17.12.2017).
  11. Dahl J. (1986), Arktisk selvstyre: historien bag og rammerne for det grønlandske hjemmestyre, Akademisk Forlag, København.
  12. Dahl J. (2003), Self-government in Greenland, The Commission on Self-Government in Greenland,
  13. http://www.namminersorneq.gl (13.07.2003).
  14. Denmark and Greenland confirm uranium agreements (2016), World Nuclear News, http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/UF-Denmark-and-Greenland-confirm-uranium-agreements-
  15. html (02.12.0217).
  16. Finne A. F. (2016), Grønland øker grunnlovstempoet, High North News, http://www.highnorthnews.com/gronland-oker-grunnlovstempoet/ (01.12.2016).
  17. Fridmann R. (2017), The Forecast for Uranium Demand, Production and Export, http://www.shearman.com/en/newsinsights/publications/2017/02/uranium-demand-production-and-export
  18. (17.12.2017).
  19. Gad U. P. (2017a), National Identity Politics and Postcolonial Sovereignty Games: Greenland, Denmark, and the European Union, Museum Tusculanum Press, Copenhagen.
  20. Gad U. P. (2017b), What kind of nation state will Greenland be? Securitization theory as a strategy for analyzing identity politics, “Politik”, årg. 20, No. 3.
  21. Gautier D. L., Bird K. J. (2009), Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas in the Arctic, “Science”, Vol. 324, issue 5931, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1169467.
  22. Greenland in Figures 2017 (2017), Statistics Greenland.
  23. Greenland’s oil and mineral strategy 2014–2018 (2014), Government of Greenland, https://www.govmin.gl/images/stories/about_bmp/publications/Greenland_oil_and_mineral_strategy_2014-2018_ENG.pdf (12.12.2017).
  24. Greenland vote on independence set (2003), „The Copenhagen Post”, 27.11.2003.
  25. Greenland votes to allow uranium, rare earths mining (2013), The Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-greenland-uranium/greenland-votes-to-allow-uranium-rare-earths-miningidUSBRE99O05A20131025 (21.11.2017).
  26. Grydehøj A. (2016), Navigating the binaries of island independence and dependence in Greenland: Decolonisation, political culture, and strategic services, “Political Geography”, Vol. 55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.09.001.
  27. Jacobsen H. (2014), Uranium a hot topic again, in Greenland, https://www.euractiv.com/section/sustainable-dev/news/uranium-a-hot-topic-again-in-greenland/ (07.12.2017).
  28. Karlsson A. (2006), Sub-National Insular Jurisdictions as Configurations of Jurisdictional Powers and Economic Capacity. A Study of Åland, The Faroe Islands and Greenland, NORDREGIO 2006:1, http://www.nordregio.se/Files/wp0601.pdf (10.07.2006).
  29. Konstytucja Królestwa Danii (1953), http://libr.sejm.gov.pl/tek01/txt/konst/dania.html (12.12.2017).
  30. Kristiansen K. (2016), In Greenland’s hunt for oil, all’s quiet on the west coast, “The Arctic Journal”, https://www.arcticnow.com/business/energy/2016/12/28/in-greenlands-hunt-for-oil-alls-quiet-on-the-west-coast/ (07.01.2017).
  31. Larsen A.Ch., Juhl Ch., Nordqvist R., Myrup M., Pedersen H., Paviassen M., Ege Ch., Hooge N. H. (2016), Uranium in Greenland: Risky business, https://noah.dk/sites/default/files/inlinefiles/160212_Feature%20article%20Arctic%20Journal.pdf (04.12.2017).
  32. Lyck L. (1997), Sustainable Development and Economic Development in Greenland, in: Socio-Economic Developments in Greenland and in other Small Nordic Jurisdictions, (ed.) L. Lyck, New Social Science Monographs, Copenhagen.
  33. Lytthans K. (1999), Perspectives in the Development of Greenlandic Administration, in: Dependency, Autonomy, Sustainability in the Arctic, (eds.) H. Petersen, B. Poppel, Aldershot, Ashgate.
  34. McGwin K. (2016), Solid majority favours Greenland independence, High North News, http://www.highnorthnews.com/solid-majority-favours-greenland-independence/ (18.12.2016).
  35. McGwin K. (2017a), Amid flagging interest in oil, Greenland sticks to its lease sale plan, “The Arctic Journal”, https://www.arcticnow.com/business/energy/2017/12/20/amid-flagging-interest-inoil-greenland-sticks-to-its-lease-sale-plan/ (27.12.2017).
  36. McGwin K. (2017b), Denmark works to keep Greenland and the Faroe Islands from going their separate ways, “The Arctic Journal”, https://www.arcticnow.com/politics-policy/2017/05/24/denmark-is-struggling-to-prevent-greenland-and-the-faroe-islands from-going-their-separate-ways/ (27.12.2017).
  37. McGwin K. (2017c), Remote settlements in Greenland have a future, but they cannot make it alone, “The Arctic Journal”, https://www.arcticnow.com/business/2017/06/02/remote-settlementsin-greenland-have-a-future-but-they-cannot-make-it-alone/ (26.12.2017).
  38. Mørkøre J. (1999), Transfers and Dependency: The Faroese Experience, “North” 2/3, http://www.nordregio.se/north9902art.htm (12.03.2004).
  39. Niepodległość dla Eskimosów (2003), “Gazeta Wyborcza” (17.09.2003).
  40. Paldam M. (1994), Grønlands økonomiske udvikling; hvad skal der til for at lukke gabet?, Århus Universitetsforlag, Århus.
  41. Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen’s Address at the Opening of the Session of the Folketing on Tuesday 7 October 2003, http://www.stm.dk/Index/dokumenter.asp?o=6&n=0&h=6&t=14&d=1674&s=2 (21.08.2006).
  42. Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen’s opening address to The Danish Parliament (the Folketing), Tuesday 4 December 2001, http://www.stm.dk/Index/dokumenter.asp?o=6&n=0&h=6&t=14&d=860&s=2 (21.08.2006).
  43. Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen’s Opening Address to the Folketing (The Danish Parliament) on Tuesday 27 November 2007, http://www.stm.dk/_p_12766.html (18.01.2008).
  44. Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen’s Opening Address to the Folketing on Tuesday 7 October 2008, http://www.stm.dk/_p_12744.html (21.01.2009).
  45. Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt’s Opening Address to the Folketing (The Danish Parliament) on Tuesday 4 October 2011, http://www.stm.dk/_p_13523.html (10.12.2011).
  46. Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt’s Opening Address to the Folketing (Danish Parliament) on 7 October 2014, http://www.stm.dk/_p_14090.html (29.11.2014).
  47. Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen’s Opening Address to the Folketing (Danish Parliament) on 6 October 2015, http://www.stm.dk/_p_14252.html (19.11.2015).
  48. Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen’s Opening Address to the Folketing (Danish Parliament) on 3 October 2017, http://www.stm.dk/_p_14597.html (20.12.2017).
  49. Report from the Commission on Self-governance (2003), Greenland Homerule, Nuuk.
  50. Sagan S., Serzhanova V., Wapińska D. (2014), Charakterystyka aktów ustrojowych autonomii nordyckich, „Studia Iuridica Lublinensia”, No. 22.
  51. Scrutton A. (2013), Mining, China central issues in Greenland election, The Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-greenland-election/mining-china-central-issues-in-greenland-election-idUSBRE92907F20130311 (19.12.2017).
  52. Stanowisko NOAH w sprawie projektu REE-U Kvanefjeld, http://www.czasopismo.cuprum.wroc.pl/articles/view/29 (21.12.2017).
  53. Stephens P. (2013), The grab for Greenland, “Financial Times”, http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/8c2b6a12-5c71-11e3-931e-00144feabdc0.html (16.01.2014).
  54. Terms of Reference for the Commission on Self-Government, The Commission on Self-Government, http://www.namminersorneq.gl (13.07.2007).
  55. To the benefit of Greenland (2014), Committee for Greenlandic Mineral Resources to the Benefit of Society, http://greenlandperspective.ku.dk/this_is_greenland_perspective/background/report-papers/To_the_benefit_of_Greenland.pdf (15.02.2017).
  56. Vikström H. (2017), The Rush for Greenlandic Metals, https://doi.org/10.15763/JOU.TS.2017.5.2.01.
  57. Walsh M. (2017), ‘You can’t live in a museum’: the battle for Greenland’s uranium, “The Guardian”, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jan/28/greenland-narsaq-uranium-minedividing-town (11.12.2017).
  58. Wilson P. (2017), An Arctic ‘cold rush’? Understanding Greenland’s (in)dependence question, “Polar Record” 53(5), https://doi.org/10.1017/S003224741700047X.
  59. Yurtaslan A. S. (2014), Greenland: Election Drama in the Arctic Circle, http://hir.harvard.edu/article/?a=8164 (09.12.2017).