Asymmetry of the Modern Conflicts
Journal cover Strategic Review, no. 17, year 2024
PDF

Keywords

conflict
threats
national security
global security
asymmetry
military spending

How to Cite

Bulatova, O., Reznikova, N., & Sarbash, S. (2024). Asymmetry of the Modern Conflicts. Strategic Review, (17), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2024.1.2

Abstract

The system of the modern global security space is characterized by an increase in instability, and the proliferation of local and military conflicts, which are becoming increasingly intense and protracted, thus necessitating the study of current trends occurring in the security system at the global, regional, and national levels. The objective of the article is to define the essence of asymmetry in modern conflicts to substantiate current trends in the international security environment in the context of russian war against Ukraine. It has been determined that modern conflicts exhibit asymmetric characteristics, which are determined by the political-legal and economic environment. The absence of opportunities to exercise civil and political rights, protection of freedoms, and beliefs, and a fair judicial system become sources of social tension and conflicts in society. Authoritarian countries fail to ensure the effective functioning of state institutions, and respect for civil rights and freedoms, which exacerbates institutional and social instability. The absence of conflicts is a normal state for democracies. Differences in economic potential among countries determine the possibilities for increasing military potential. It is argued that a high level of military spending does not guarantee a high level of stability in a country, and social and economic inequality further exacerbates stratification and tension in society. Countries with high levels of prosperity demonstrate the highest levels of peacefulness, which do not necessarily coincide with high levels of military financing. It has been identified that the consequences of modern conflicts also have an asymmetric nature, which enhances the tendency towards the internationalization of internal conflicts: the countries most affected are those where the most intense conflicts take place, as well as their neighbouring countries. russia’s war against Ukraine has heightened the global level of danger in terms of tension and conflicts.

https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2024.1.2
PDF

References

ACLED (2024), Armed Conflict Location & Event Data, https://acleddata.com/ (11.06.2024).

Bulatova O., Osaulenko O., Zakharova O. (2021), Monitoring and evaluation of the level of development of the European regional security complex, “Baltic Journal of Economic Studies”, 7(1): 27–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-1-27-38

Collier P., Hoeffler A. (May 2000), Greed and Grievance in Civil War, https://ssrn.com/abstract=630727 (15.12.2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2355

de Groot O. J., Bozzoli C., Alamir A., Brück T. (2022), The global economic burden of violent conflict, “Journal of Peace Research”, 59(2): 259–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433211046823

Dunne P., García-Alonso M. del C., Levine P., Smith R. (2004), Managing asymmetric conflict, “Department of Economics Discussion Paper”, 0411, University of Kent, Department of Economics, Canterbury.

Economist Intelligence (2022), Democracy Index 2022, https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2022/ (15.12.2024).

Fearon J., Laitin D. (2003), Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War, “American Political Science Review”, 97(1): 75–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000534

Fragile States Index (2024), Country Dashboard, https://fragilestatesindex.org/ (11.06.2024).

Gurr T. (1968), A Causal Model of Civil Strife: A Comparative Analysis Using New Indices, “American Political Science Review”, 62(4): 1104–1124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1953907

Hegre H. (2014), Democracy and Armed Conflict, “Journal of Peace Research”, 51(2): 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343313512852

Hegrel Н., Nygard Н. (2015), Governance and Conflict Relapse, “Journal of Conflict Resolution”, 59(6): 984–1016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002713520591

Hrynchak N., Yatsenko O., Bulatova O., Ptashchenko O. (2023), Problems realating to the statistical research of the national market of logistics services in war conditions, “Statistics in transition new series”, 24(1): 13–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59170/stattrans-2023-002

Institute for Economics & Peace (2024), Global Peace Index 2024, https://reliefweb.int/report/world/global-peace-index-2024 (11.06.2024).

Intriligator M. D. (1982), Research on Conflict Theory: Analytic Approaches and Areas of Application, “The Journal of Conflict Resolution”, 26(2): 307–327, http://www.jstor.org/stable/173904 (15.12.2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002782026002006

Jaźwiński I. (2023), Economic Security Threats. Determinants Of State Functioning And Economic Policy, “Przegląd Strategiczny”, (16). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2023.1.6

Jureńczyk Ł. (2023), The United States And Ukraine’s Aspirations For Nato Membership, “Przegląd Strategiczny”, (16): 49–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2023.1.4

Lavrynenko Н., Donaj Ł. (2023), Unification Of Ukrainian Society In A Postwar Period As A Preventive Mechanism To Avert The Crisis Of State, “Przegląd Strategiczny”, (16): 321–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2023.1.23

Sandler T. (2000), Economic analysis of conflict, “Journal of Conflict Resolution”, 44(6): 723–729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002700044006001

SIPRI, (2024), SIPRI databases, https://www.sipri.org/databases (15.12.2024).

Social Progress Imperative (2024), Global Social Progress Index, https://www.socialprogress.org/social-progress-index (15.12.2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nba.31669

Sung Ch. J. (2022), Economic slowdowns and international conflict, “Journal of Peace Research”, 61(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433221116656

The Institute for Economics & Peace, We create a paradigm shift in the way the world thinks about peace, https://www.economicsandpeace.org/ (15.12.2024).

Theiler Т. (2018), The microfoundations of diversionary conflict, “Security Studies”, Vol. 27(2): 318–343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2017.1386941

UNCTAD, Statistics. Empowering development through data, https://unctadstat.unctad.org/EN/ (11.06.2024).

Wojciechowski S. (2023), The Spirit of Terrorism – its Contemporary Evolution and Escalation, “Przegląd Strategiczny”, (16): 9–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2023.1.1