Słowa kluczowe
zachodniocentryzm
głęboki pluralizm
geoepistemologia
szkoły narodowe
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
Projekt Globalne Stosunki Międzynarodowe (Global International Relations, dalej GSM) ma tworzyć warunki dla sposobów wytwarzania wiedzy, przywoływania doświadczeń i tworzenia teoretycznych pojęć, które mają swoje źródła poza nowożytnym Zachodem. Zwolennicy projektu odrzucają przekonanie, że jedynie Zachód dostarcza prawomocnych fundamentów i materiału empirycznego do teoretyzowania polityki światowej i starają się zintegrować lub włączyć „lokalne” miejsca wytwarzania wiedzy do dyscyplinarnych debat. Zwolennicy GSM odrzucają tezę, że historia Zachodu jest jedynym dostarczycielem empirii SM, w oparciu o którą rozwija się i testuje teorie stosunków międzynarodowych. Liczni autorzy i zwolennicy projektu wskazują, że Zachód nie jest synonimem ani międzynarodowości, ani globalności.
W listopadzie 2024 roku odbył się w Krakowie II Kongres Polskiego Towarzystwa Studiów Międzynarodowych pod tytułem „Globalne Stosunki Międzynarodowe: wyzwania i rozwój”, którego przedmiotem była geneza, współczesny wymiar, kierunki rozwoju oraz krytyka pojęcia GSM. W związku z tym, celem artykułu jest analiza obecnego w dyscyplinie dyskursu oraz prezentacja projektu GSM poprzez omówienie jego genezy i wskazanie prekursorów (część 1 i 2), przedstawienie prowadzonych badań (część 3) oraz ukazanie potencjalnych kierunków rozwoju i związanych z nimi wątpliwości i ryzyk (część 3).
Bibliografia
Abu-Lughod J. (1989), Before European Hegemony. The World System AD 1250–1350, New York.
Acharya A. (2014), Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds. A New Agenda for International Studies, “International Studies Quarterly”, Vol. 58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12171
Acharya A., Buzan B. (2007), Why Is There No Non-Western IR Theory? Reflections on and from Asia. An Introduction, “International Relations of the Asia-Pacific”, Vol. 7, No. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcm011
Acharya A., Buzan B. (2010), Non-Western International Relations Theory. Perspectives on and beyond Asia, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861431
Acharya A., Buzan B. (2019), The Making of Global International Relations. Origins and Evolution of IR at its Centenary, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108647670
Agathangelou A., Ling L. H. M. (2004), Power, Borders, Security, Wealth. Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11, “International Studies Quarterly”, Vol. 48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00313.x
Barkawi T., Murray Ch., Zarakol A. (2023), The United Nations of IR: Power, Knowledge, and Empire in Global IR Debates, “International Theory”, Vol. 15, No. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971923000167
Barnett M., Lawson G. (2023), Three Visions of the Global: Global International Relations, Global History, Global Historical Sociology, “International Theory”, Vol. 15, No. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971923000179
Behera N. C. (2016), Knowledge Production, “International Studies Review”, Vol. 0.
Bell D. (2020), Dreamworlds of Race, Princeton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691194011.001.0001
Blaut J. M. (1993), The Colonizer’s Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric History, New York.
Blaut J. M. (2000), Eight Eurocentric Historians, New York.
Bilgin P. (2008), Thinking Past ‘Western’ IR?, “Third World Quarterly”, Vol. 29, No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701726392
Biswas S. (2007), Empire and Global Public Intellectuals. Reading Edward Said as an International Relations Theorist, “Millennium”, Vol. 36, No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298070360010801
Blaney D., Inayatullah N. (1994), Prelude to a Conversation of Cultures in International Society? Todorov and Nandy on the Possibility of Dialogue, “Alternatives”, Vol. 19, No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030437549401900102
Brown Ch., Nardin T., Rengger N. (eds.) (2002), International Relations in Political Thought. Texts from the Ancient Greeks to the First World War, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808784
Buzan B. (2016), Could IR Be Different?, “International Studies Review”, Vol. 0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viv025
Buzan B., Acharya A. (2021), Re-imagining International Relations. World Orders in the Thought and Practice of Indian, Chinese, and Islamic Civilizations, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009076197
Buzan B., Lawson G. (2020), China through the Lens of Modernity, “Chinese Journal of International Politics” (online). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poaa005
Chan S., Mandaville P., Bleiker R. (eds.) (2001), The Zen of International Relations. IR Theory from East to West, Hampshire. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286429
Chowdhry G., Nair S. (eds.) (2004), Power, Post-colonialism and International Relations, London.
Christian D. (2005), Maps of Time. An Introduction to Big History, Berkeley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520931923
Chu S. (2022), Whither Chinese IR? The Sinocentric Subject and the Paradox of Tianxia-ism, “International Theory”, Vol. 14, No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000214
Cox R. W. (1981), Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory, “Millennium. Journal of International Studies”, Vol. 10, No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501
Darby P. (ed.) (1997), At the Edge of International Relations. Post-colonialism. Gender and Dependency, London.
Dirlik A. (2007), Global Modernity. Modernity in the Age of Global Capitalism, Boulder.
Dirlik A. (2010), Culture in Contemporary IR Theory. The Chinese Provocation, in: International Relations and Non-Western Thought. Imperialism, Colonialism and Investigations of Global Modernity, (ed.) R. Shilliam, London–New York.
Fernández-Armesto F. (2008), Cywilizacje. Kultura, ambicje i przekształcanie natury, Warszawa.
Frank A. G. (1998), ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age, Berkeley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520921313
Gałganek A. (2009, 2021), Historia teorii stosunków międzynarodowych, Warszawa.
Gałganek A. (2012), Międzynarodowa socjologia historyczna i genealogia międzynarodowości, in: Wielo- i interdyscyplinarność nauki o stosunkach międzynarodowych, (eds.) A. Gałganek, E. Haliżak, M. Pietraś, Warszawa.
Gałganek A. (2013), Historia stosunków międzynarodowych. Nierówni i połączony rozwój, t. 1 i 2, Warszawa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2013.2.2
Gałganek A. (2018), Genealogia międzynarodowości. Społeczna teoria stosunków międzynarodowych, „Przegląd Politologiczny”, Vol. 10, No. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/pp.2010.15.3.1
Ge Z. (2015), Dui tianxia de xianxiang: yige wutuobang beihou de zhengzhi sixiang yu xueshu [Visions of ‘Tianxia’ – Politics, Ideas, and Scholarship Behind a Utopian Vision], “Reflection”, No. 29 (October).
Geeraerts G., Jing M. (2001), International Relations Theory in China, “Global Society”, Vol. 15, No. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820120066258
George J. (1994), Discourses of Global Politics. A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations, Boulder, Colorado. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685859343
Geyer M., Bright C. (1995), World History in a Global Age, „American Historical Review”, Vol. 100, No. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2168200
Goody J. (1996), The East in the West, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171052
Goody J. (2006), Kapitalizm i nowoczesność. Islam, Chiny, Indie a narodziny Zachodu, Warszawa.
Goody J. (2009), Kradzież historii, Warszawa.
Hobson J. M. (2004), The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489013
Hoffmann S. (1977), An American Social Science: International Relations, “Daedalus”, Vol. 106, No. 3.
Huntington S. P. (1996), The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, New York.
Hurrell A. (2016), Beyond Critique: How to Study Global IR?, “International Studies Review”, Vol. 0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viv022
Iggers G. G. (2010), Historiografia XX wieku, Warszawa.
Jarvis D. (2001), Beyond International Relations: Edward Said and the World, in: Still an American Social Science? Towards Diversity in International Thought, (ed.) M. Crawford, New York.
Kang D. (2020), International Order in Historical East Asia, “International Organization”, Vol. 74, No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818319000274
Koyama H., Buzan B. (2019) Rethinking Japan in Mainstream International Relations, “International Relations of the Asia-Pacific”, Vol. 19, No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcy013
Kristensen P. M. (2013), Revisiting the “American Social Science”. Mapping the Geography of International Relations, “International Studies Perspectives”, Vol. 16, No. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12061
Lebow R. N., Schouten P., Suganami H. (eds.) (2016), The Return of the Theorists. Dialogues with Great Thinkers in International Relations, Hampshire. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137516459
Ling L. H. M. (2013), The Dao of World Politics. Towards a post-Westphalian, Worldist International Relations, London–New York.
Maliniak D., Peterson S., Powers R., Tierney M. J. (2018), Is International Relations a Global Discipline? Hegemony, Insularity, and Diversity in the Field, “Security Studies”. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2017.1416824
Mcintosh Ch. (2024), The Time of Global Politics. International Relations as Study of the Present, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009386838
Mearsheimer J. J., Walt S. M. (2013), Leaving Theory Behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing Is Bad for International Relations, “European Journal of International Relations”, Vol. 19, No. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494320
Mearsheimer J. J. (2016), Benign Hegemony, “International Studies Review”, Vol. 0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viv021
Nakano R. (2013), Beyond the Western Liberal Order. Yanaihara Tadao and Empire as Society, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290519
Neuman S. (1998), International Relations Theory and the Third World, London.
Pasha M. K. (2010), Untimely Reflections, in: International Relations and Non-Western Thought. Imperialism, Colonialism and Investigations of Global Modernity, (ed.) R. Shilliam, London–New York.
Persaud R. (1997), Frantz Fanon, Race and World Order, in: Innovation and Transformation in International Studies, (eds.) S. Gill, J. Mittelman, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511559006.015
Pijl van der K. (2014), The Discipline of Western Supremacy. Modes of Foreign Relations and Political Economy, Vol. III, London.
Pomeranz K. (2000), The Great Divergence. China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy, Princeton–Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823499
Pomeranz K. (2007), Social History and World History: From Daily Life to Patterns of Change, “Journal of World History”, Vol. 18, No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2007.0006
Rosenberg J. (2010), Problems in the Theory of Uneven and Combined Development. Part II: Unevenness and Multiplicity, “Cambridge Review of International Affairs”, Vol. 23, No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570903524270
Rosenberg J. (2013), Kenneth Waltz and Leon Trotsky: Anarchy in the Mirror of Uneven and Combined Development, “International Politics”, Vol. 50, No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2013.6
Rosenberg J. (2016), International Relations in the Prison of Political Science, “International Relations”, Vol. 30, No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117816644662
Rosenberg J. (2017), The Elusive International, “International Relations”, Vol. 31, No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117817691353
Rosenberg J. (2018), IR 101, “International Relations”, Vol. 32, No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117818774726
Rosenberg J. (2020), Uneven and Combined Development: a Defense of the General Abstraction, “Cambridge Review of International Affairs”, Vol. 35, No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2020.1835824
Sachsenmaier D. (2007), World History as Ecumenical History?, „Journal of World History”, Vol. 18, No. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2008.0002
Shahi D. (2018), Kautilya and Non-Western IR Theory, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01728-6
Shih C-Y. (2022), Post-Chineseness. Cultural Politics and International Relations, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438487724
Shilliam R. (ed.) (2010), International Relations and Non-Western Thought. Imperialism, Colonialism and Investigations of Global Modernity, London–New York.
Teschke B. (2003), The Myth of 1648. Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations, London–New York.
Vale P. (2016), Inclusion and Exclusion, “International Studies Review”, Vol. 0.
Wæver O. (1998), The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations, “International Organization”, Vol. 52, No. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550725
Wolf E. (2009), Europa i ludy bez historii, Kraków.
Yan X. (2013), Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power, New Jersey.
Yudan C. (2023), Global Sources of International Thought, in: The Oxford Handbooks of History and International Relations, (eds.) M. Bukowansky et al., Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198873457.013.11
Zhao T. (2022), Nowa filozofia ładu światowego, Toruń.
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2024 Andrzej Gałganek
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.