Keywords
responding to attacks
counter-terrorism
terrorist attack site
How to Cite
Abstract
The purpose of the research, the results of which are included in this publication, was to develop general conclusions regarding the conduct of counterterrorism operations in the context of the place of a terrorist attack. Thus, the identified subject and purpose of the research determined its categorization as applied and embedded in the discipline of security sciences. Corresponding with the purpose of the research process is the research question – what recommendations and conclusions related to the place of a terrorist attacks can be crucial for designing an institutional response? The author assumed in the research hypothesis the possibility of deriving such valuable conclusions that can contribute to strengthening the qualitative response to contemporary terrorist attacks. The research described in the text was based on scientific methods in the form of literature analysis and criticism, document analysis, comparative analysis, cross-sectional synthesis and multiple immersion case studies. The research results obtained became the basis for the development of key conclusions that should be taken into account in the preparation of solutions for institutional response to contemporary terrorist attacks.
References
Apanowicz J. (2002), Metodologia ogólna, Gdynia, Poland.
Caravelli J., Trim P. R. J. (2009), Strategizing Resilience and Reducing Vulnerability, New York, USA.
Cichomski M. (2023), Zabezpieczenie konferencji, imprez, uroczystości i innych wydarzeń, w tym w kontekście zagrożeń o charakterze terrorystycznym. Perspektywa ustawowa, „Terroryzm – studia, analizy, prewencja”, Vol. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/27204383TER.23.002.17442
Compa T. (2018), Współczesne zagrożenia bezpieczeństwa transportu lotniczego, „Facta Simonidis”, Vol. 11/1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56583/fs.118
Craigie R. J., Farrelly P. J., Santos R. (2020), Manchester Arena bombing: lessons learnt from a mass casualty incident, “BMJ Mil Health”, Vol. 166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jramc-2018-000930
First Responders Toolbox – Special and Significant Events with Feedback.pdf, https://www.dni.gov/files/NCTC/documents/jcat/firstresponderstoolbox/First_Responders_Toolbox_-_Special_and_Significant_Events_with_Feedback.pdf (20.06.2024).
Garber L. (2015), Have we learned a lesson? The Boston marathon bombings and information sharing, „Administrative Law Review”, Vol. 2/67.
German M. (2007), Thinking Like a Terrorist: Insights of a Former FBI Undercover Agent, Washington, D.C., USA.
Glen A. (2021), Podstawy poznania bezpieczeństwa podmiotu – aksjologia, ontologia, epistemologia, metodologia, Siedlce, Poland.
Hoffman B. (1994), Responding to terrorism across the technological spectrum, “Terrorism and Political Violence”, Vol. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09546559408427265
Horgan J. (2008), Psychologia terroryzmu, Warszawa, Poland.
Jackson B. A., Peterson D. J., Bartis J. T., LaTourrette T., Brahmakulam I. T. (2002), Protecting emergency responders: Lessons learned from terrorist attacks, Rand Corporation, USA.
Jasiński A. (2009), Wielkomiejski dylemat – przestrzeń publiczna czy przestrzeń bezpieczna, „Przestrzeń i Forma”, Vol. 12.
Jasiński A. (2013), Architektura w czasach terroryzmu. Miasto – przestrzeń publiczna – budynek, Warszawa, Poland.
Lloyd C. A. (2013), Nuclear Terrorism: Response Preparedness Issues of Major Cities, New York, USA.
Misiuk A., Dobrowolska-Opała M. (2018), Zagrożenia terrorystyczne imprez masowych organizowanych w Polsce, „Studia Politologiczne”, Vol. 49.
Newman G. R., Clarke R. V. (2008), Policing Terrorism: An executive’s Guide, U.S. Department of Justice.
Olson D. T. (2012), Tactical Counterterrorism: The Law Enforcement Manual of Terrorism Prevention, Illinois, USA.
Schmid A. P. (2012), Twelve Rules for Preventing and Countering Terrorism by Alex P. Schmid, “Perspectives on Terrorism”, Vol. 3/6.
Schmid A. P., Forest J., Lowe T. (2021), Counter-Terrorism Studies: A Glimpse at the Current State of Research, “Perspectives on Terrorism”, Vol. 4/15.
Stelmach J. (2018), Kategorie obiektów użyteczności publicznej i stopnie ich ochrony w kontekście zagrożenia współczesnym terroryzmem, in: Bezpieczeństwo antyterrorystyczne budynków użyteczności publicznej. Analiza – diagnoza – case study, (eds.) B. Wiśniewska-Paź, M. Szostak, J. Stelmach, Toruń, Poland.
Stelmach J. (2023), Zamachy terrorystyczne. Istota i koncepcja reagowania, Warszawa, Poland.
Walczak A. (2008), Master’s behaviour in an interaction with ship hijackers, “Scientific Journals Maritime University of Szczecin”, Vol. 13 (85).
Yin R. K. (2015), Studium przypadku w badaniach naukowych. Projektowanie i metody, Kraków, Poland.
Zasieczny A. (eds.) (2004), Encyklopedia terroryzmu, Warszawa, Poland.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jarosław Stelmach
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.