The European Union Under the Conditions of the Migration Crises: Consequences for the Evolution of the Identity of the European Union
Journal cover Strategic Review, no. 18, year 2025
PDF

Keywords

European Union
migration crisis
normative identity
European identity
solidarity

How to Cite

Piskorska, B., & Tutak, G. (2025). The European Union Under the Conditions of the Migration Crises: Consequences for the Evolution of the Identity of the European Union. Strategic Review, (18), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2025.1.12

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyse the consequences of the migration crises that occurred in 2015–2016 and as a result of the war in Ukraine and their significance for the identity of the European Union. The analysis pays attention to the concept of “European identity” and its evolution in the conditions of changing international reality, as well as to the migration crises that have affected Europe in recent years, and therefore the European Union itself. The thesis is proposed that during the so-called European migration crisis of 2015–2016 and 2022–2024, there was a “normative gap” between EU Member States, which led to different bases for argumentation about the shape of EU migration policy. Moreover, the paper answers the question – how do these crises affect the EU’s ability to influence the environment using normative and soft power, and what is the significance these crises for the identity of the community? It was found that the identity of the EU is still evolving, and that as a result of the migration crises its character has become more defensive. At the same time, in the European Union member states there is still a strong belief that problems, including migration problems, can be solved more effectively not so much at the EU level but rather at the level of nation states.

https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2025.1.12
PDF

References

A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe, 15.12.2019, Council of the European Union, Brussels, 14 November 2016 (OR. en), 14392/16, https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_implementation_plan_st14392.en16_0.pdf (10.08.2024).

Adamczyk A. (2016), Kryzys imigracyjny w UE i sposoby jego rozwiązania, „Przegląd Politologiczny”, No. 3.

Bachleitnera K., Bett A. (2024), The EU’s Normative Dissensus on Migration: How National Identities Shaped Responses to the European Refugee Crisis, “Journal of European Integration”.

Borkowski P. J. (2015/2016), Unia Europejska – kryzys egzystencjalny, „Rocznik Strategiczny”, Vol. 21.

Borrell J. (2024), Europe Day 2024: The need of a paradigm shift for the EU, 9.05.2024, https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/europe-day-2024-need-paradigm-shift-eu_en (10.08.2024).

Borrell J. (2023), Migration is a key element of our foreign policy, 07.02.2023, https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/migration-key-element-our-foreign-policy_en (10.08.2024).

Borrell J. (2020), Why European strategic autonomy matters, 03.12.2020, https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/why-european-strategic-autonomy-matters_en (10.08.2024).

Brug W. van der, Popa S. A., Hobolt S. B., Schmitt H. (2021), Illiberal democratic attitudes and support for the EU, “PoliticsVolume Special Issue Article”, Vol. 41, No. 4.

Brumat L., Freier F. (2023), Unpacking the Unintended Consequences of European Migration Governance: The Case of South American Migration Policy Liberalisation, “Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies”, 49(12): 3060–3084.

Ceccorulli M., Fassi E. (2021), The EU’s External Governance of Migration: Perspectives of Justice, Routledge, P. 5-195.

Costa O., Barbé E. (2023), A moving target. EU actorness and the Russian invasion of Ukraine, “Journal of European Integration”, Vol. 45, Issue 3.

Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof (2001), OJ. L 212, 7 August 2001.

Duke S. W. (2019), The Competing Logics of EU Security and Defence, “Survival. Global Politics and Strategy”, Vol. 61, Issue 2.

Dunaj Ł. (2023), Unia Europejska a Rosja w kontekście pełnoskalowej agresji z 2022 roku na Ukrainę, „Sprawy Zagraniczne”, No. 1.

Eichengreen B. (2018), The Populist Temptation: Economic Grievance and Political Re-action in the Modern Era, Oxford University Press.

Fligstein N., Polyakova A., Sandholtz W. (2012), European Integration, Nationalism and European Identity, “Journal of Common Market Studies”, 50(1): 106–122.

Góra M. (2019), Legitymizacja i kontestacja polityki zagranicznej Unii Europejskiej na przykładzie polityki rozszerzenia i Europejskiej Polityki Sąsiedztwa, Kraków.

Handler H. (2018), How the Migration Wave Challenges European Identity, “Policy Crossover Center: Vienna-Europe Flash Paper”, No. 8.

Howorth J. (2019), Strategic Autonomy. Why It’s Not About Europe Going it Alone, Wilfried MartensCentre for European Studies, https://www.martenscentre.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/strategic-autonomy-europe.pdf (30.07.2024).

Lesiewicz E. (2016), Strefa Schengen w dobie kryzysu imigracyjnego, „Przegląd Politologiczny”, No. 3.

Łubiński P. (2022), Hybrid Warfare or Hybrid Threat – The Weaponization of Migration as an Example of the Use of Lawfare – Case Study of Poland, “Polish Political Science Yearbook”, Vol. 51.

Pietrzak N. (2020), Polityzacja zjawiska migracji na Węgrzech pod przywództwem Viktora Orbana w latach 2015–2019, w: Wschodnie Forum Nauki, (eds.) R. Czyżyk, Lublin.

Piskorska B. (2023), Challenges To The European Union’s Adaptive Capacity In The Foreign And Security Policy Sphere On The Example Of Russia’s Aggression In Ukraine, “Transformations. Interdisciplinary Journal”, No. 4(119).

Piskorska B. (2022), Strategic projects to revitalise the European Union’s power in global affairs in the 21st century, “On-line Journal Modelling the New Europe”, No. 39, September: 150–173.

Potyrała A. (2016), Pozamilitarne aspekty bezpieczeństwa międzynarodowego – kryzys migracyjny 2015–2016, „Przegląd Strategiczny”, No. 9.

Statistics on migration to Europe, https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/promoting-our-european-way-life/statistics-migration-europe_pl#migracja-do-ue-i-z-ue (09.07.2024).

Stepniewski T. (2015), Partnerstwo Wschodnie Unii Europejskiej: w poszukiwaniu nowego modelu integracji, „Myśl Ekonomiczna i Polityczna”, No. 4.

Szymańska J. (2024), Przyjęcie uchodźców z Ukrainy w UE a przyszłość unijnej polityki migracyjnej i azylowej, in: Unia Europejska wobec rosyjskiej agresji na Ukrainę, J. Szymańska (ed.), Warszawa.

Tutak G. (2018), Polityka migracyjna Polski wobec europejskiego kryzysu migracyjnego, „Świat Idei i Polityki”, No. 17.

Varga G. (2017), Towards European Strategic Autonomy? Evaluating the New CSDP Initiatives, Institute for Foreign Affairs and Trade, https://kki.hu/assets/upload/07_KKI-Studies_CSDP_Var-gaG_20171003.pdf (30.07.2020).

Zdanowski J. (2011), Bliski Wschód 2011: bunt czy rewolucja?, Kraków.

Zieliński T. (2020), Strategic Autonomy of the European Union in Security and Defence, “Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review”, Vol. 18, No. 1.