Łamanie praw człowieka w imię ochrony bezpieczeństwa. Polityka Stanów Zjednoczonych wobec zagrożenia terroryzmem na początku XXI wieku

Main Article Content

Ewelina Waśko-Owsiejczuk

Abstrakt

The terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001 by the terrorist organization Al-Qaeda on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, initiated a series of changes in U.S. security policy. The amount of power the executive government, special services and police had was greatly extended in the name of the war on terror. A country that used to be characterized by openness, commitment to freedom and civil liberties, has become a country that spies on its own citizens. It has turned out that „the police of the world” do not comply with international law themselves and use torture against people suspected of terrorist activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Waśko-Owsiejczuk, E. (2013). Łamanie praw człowieka w imię ochrony bezpieczeństwa. Polityka Stanów Zjednoczonych wobec zagrożenia terroryzmem na początku XXI wieku. Przegląd Strategiczny, (2), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2013.2.10
Dział
Bezpieczeństwo ludzkie

Bibliografia

  1. A Human Rights First Report: Trials Under Military Order. A Guide to the Rules for Military Commissions, New York 2006.
  2. Military Commission Act of 2006, http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgibin/getdoc .cgi?dbname=109_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ366.109.pdf ( 20.08.2012).
  3. President Issues Military Order: Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain Non-Citizens in the War Against Terrorism, Washington D.C., November 13, 2001.
  4. Raport 2005 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, http://state.gov/g/drl/rls/ hrrpt/2005/index.htm (20.08.2012).
  5. Supporting Human Rights and Democracy: The U.S. Record 2004 – 2005, http:// state.gov/j/drl/rls/shrd/2004/ (15.08.2012).
  6. The "Taguba Report" On Treatment Of Abu Ghraib Prisoners In Iraq, http:// http://news.findlaw.com/wsj/docs /iraq/ tagubarpt.html (15.08.2012).
  7. Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, October 26, 2001, U.S. H.R. 3162, Public Law 107-56.
  8. UN Security Council Resolution 1368, 2001, http://www.un.org (15.06.2013);
  9. Bush G.W. (2010), Decision Points, New York.
  10. Chomsky N. (2008), Interwencje, Katowice.
  11. Etzioni A. (2005), How Patriotic is The Patriot Act?, New York.
  12. Fuentes C. (2004), Contra Bush, Warszawa.
  13. Saar E., Novak V. (2006), Guantanamo. Cała prawda o amerykańskiej bazie na Kubie, Warszawa.
  14. Tanner S.(2007), Wojny Bushów. Ojciec i syn jako zwierzchnicy sił zbrojnych, Wrocław.
  15. Woodward B.(2003), Wojna Busha, Warszawa.
  16. Foner E. (2007), Ameryka nie jest niewinna, w: Ameryka zbuntowana. Siedemnaście dialogów o ciemnych stronach imperium wolności, (red.) A. Domosławski, Warszawa.
  17. Herman S.N. (2006), The USA Patriot Act and the Submajoritarian Fourth Amendment, “Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review”, No. 41.
  18. Fisher L. (2006), Detention and Military Trial of Suspected Terrorists: Stretching Presidential Power, “Journal of National Security Law & Policy”, No.2:1.
  19. American Civil Liberties Union, http://aclu.org/leader/susan-n-herman (14.08.2012).
  20. Amnesty International, http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AMR51/103/2011/en/43fe 877f-92c6-44b8-ad3e-4840db5d0852/amr511032011en.pdf (20.08.2012).
  21. BBC News, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4956946.stm (15.08.2012).
  22. Department of Defense, http://www.defense.gov/news/combatant_tribunalsarchive.html (20.08.2012).
  23. Federal Register, http://fas.org/irp/news/2001/09/fr091801.html (10.08.2012).
  24. Gallup, http://gallup.com/poll/113641/Despite-Recent-Lows-Bush-Approval-Average-Midrange.aspx (4.08.2012).
  25. Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/sep/28/iraq.usa (15.08.2012).
  26. Huffingtonpost, http://www. huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/05/wikileaks-exposes-videoo_n_525569.html (20.08.2012).
  27. Human Rights Watch, http://hrw.org/news/2001/10/29/afghanistan-new-civilian-deaths-due-us-bombing (10.08.2012).
  28. Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/the-fog-of-war-white-phosphorus-fallujah-and-some-burning-questions-515345.html (18.08.2012).
  29. International Humanitarian Law,http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/FULL/375 (20.08.2012).
  30. Los Angeles Times, http://articles.latimes.com/2006/apr/29/nation/na-jordan29 (15.08.2012).
  31. NATO, http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2001/p01-124e.htm (10.08.2012).
  32. New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/politics/20030322_poll/20030322poll-results.html (4.08.2012).
  33. New Yorker, http://newyorker.c om/archive/2004/05/10/040510fa_fact (15.08.2012).
  34. PewResearchCenter Publications, http://pewresearch. org/pubs/770/iraq-war-five-year-anniversary (14.08.2012).
  35. United Nations, http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N01/533/82/PDF/N0153382.pdf?Op enElement (10.08.2012).
  36. Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/vault/stories/data091401.htm, (4.08.2012).
  37. White House, http://georgewbushwhitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/09/ 20010911-16.html (4.08.2012).