Teoria sekurytyzacji i konstruowanie bezpieczeństwa

Main Article Content

Łukasz Fijałkowski

Abstrakt

Theory of securitization is one of the most significant approaches to security in recent decades. It is used in the theoretical debate on the very nature of security and in the analysis of the security practice. The concept of securitization, associated with the so called Copenhagen School, is an attempt to conceptualize the security in a new way, without losing its analytical utility. The main object of investigation is the process of constructing the security as an intersubjective process of including/excluding the issues into/from the security sphere. Security is treated as a speech act, and the theory is aiming to gain the understanding who is securitizing, what issues are securitized, who is a referent object, why, with what results and under what conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Fijałkowski, Łukasz. (2012). Teoria sekurytyzacji i konstruowanie bezpieczeństwa. Przegląd Strategiczny, (1), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2012.1.10
Dział
Geostrategia

Bibliografia

  1. Aradau C., Limits of security, limits of politics? A response, „Journal of International Relations and Development” 2006, vol. 9, no 1.
  2. Aradau C., Security and the democratic scene: Desecuritization and emancipation, „Journal of International Relations and Development” 2004, vol. 7, no 4.
  3. Balzacq Th., The three faces of securitization: Political agency, audience and context, „European Journal of International Relations” 2005, vol. 11, no 2.
  4. Buzan B., Hansen L., The Evolution of International Security Studies, Cambridge 2009.
  5. Buzan B., People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, London 1991
  6. Buzan B., Rethinking Security after the Cold War, „Cooperation and Conflict” 1997, vol. 32, no 1.
  7. Buzan B., Wæver O., J. De Wilde, Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, CO 1998.
  8. Buzan B., Wæver O., Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security, Cambridge 2003.
  9. C.A.S.E. Collective, Critical Approaches to Security in Europe: A Networked Manifesto, „Security Dialogue” 2005, vol. 37, no 4.
  10. Elbe S., Should HIV/AIDS be securitized? The ethical dilemmas linking HIV/AIDS and security, „International Studies Quarterly” 2006, vol. 50, no 1.
  11. Gad U. P., Petersen K .L., Concepts of politics in securitization studies, „Security Dialogue” 2011,vol. 42, no 4–5.
  12. Hansen L., Theorizing the image for Security Studies: Visual securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis, „European Journal of International Relations” 2011, vol. 17, no 1.
  13. Huysmans J., The Politics of Insecurity: fear, migration and asylum in the EU, Routledge 2006.
  14. Kostecki W., Europe after the Cold War. The security complex theory, Warszawa 1996.
  15. McDonald M., Constructivism, w: Security Studies: An Introduction, ed. P. D. Williams, London–New York 2008.
  16. McDonald M., Securitization and the construction of security, „European Journal of International Relations” 2008, vol. 14, no 4.
  17. McDonald, Securitization and the construction of security, „European Journal of International Relations” 2008, vol. 14, no 4.
  18. McSweeney B., Identity and security: Buzan and the Copenhagen School, „Review of Interna-tional Studies” 1996, vol. 22, no 1.
  19. Non-traditional security in Asia: dilemmas in securitization, eds. M. C. Anthony, R. Emmers, A. Acharya, Aldershot 2006.
  20. Peoples C., Vaughan-Williams N., Critical Security Stu-dies. An introduction, London–New York 2010.
  21. Roe P., Actor, audience(s) and emergency measures: Securitization and the UK’s decision to invade Iraq, „Security Dialogue” 2008, vol. 39, no 6.
  22. Roe P., Securitization and minority rights: Conditions of desecuritization, „Security Dialogue” 2004, vol. 35, no 3.
  23. Schmitt C., Teologia polityczna i inne pisma, Kraków 2000.
  24. Stritzel H., Towards a theory of securitization: Copenhagen and Beyond, „European Journal of International Relations” 2007, vol. 13, no 3.
  25. Taureck R., Securitization theory – The Story so far: Theorethical inheritance and what it means to be a post-structural realist, paper for presentation at the 4th annual CEEISA convention, University of Tartu, 25–27 June 2006.
  26. Taureck R., Securitization theory and securitization studies, „Journal of International Relations and Development” 2006, vol. 9, no 1.
  27. Vuori J., Illocutionary logic and strands of securitization: Applying the theory of securitization to the study of non-democratic political orders, „European Journal of International Relations” 2008, vol. 14, no 1.
  28. Wæver O., Aberystwyth, Paris, Copenhagen: New ‘schools’ in security theory and their origins between core and periphery, paper presented at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Montreal, 17–20 March 2004.
  29. Wæver O., Securitization and desecuritization, w: On Security, ed. R. D. Lipschutz, New York 1995.
  30. Waltz K., Theory of International Politics, Reading 1979.
  31. Williams M. C., Words, images, enemies: Securitization and international politics, „International Studies Quarterly” 2003, vol. 47, no 4.
  32. Wolfers A., „National Security” as an Ambiguous Symbol, „Political Science Quarterly” 1952, vol. 67, no 4.
  33. Wyn Jones R., Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory, London 1999.
  34. Zięba R., Pozimnowojenny paradygmat bezpieczeństwa międzynarodowego, w: Bezpieczeństwo międzynarodowe po zimnej wojnie, red. R. Zięba, Warszawa 2008.