Keywords
globalization
securitization
migration
How to Cite
Abstract
The events and processes of the recent decades drive us to awake from the hypnotic illusion of the ‘end of history’. The ‘return of history’ is not only a necessary step that has to be taken, but it is ontologically inevitable. Blinded by the mobile army of metaphors, metonyms and anthropomorphisms, we need to see that the processes of the 21st century are no different from the old politics which were recorded in history, thus it is unavoidable to think within the ‘dialectics of Old and New’. Globalization, relativization of values, removal of borders and the re-narration of borders in previously unseen areas lead us to an existential zero point. Borders play significant self-determining and self-definition role in our life and society, thus their relocation, reorientation and blurring of their meaning is a question that has to be analysed and closely watched. Together with the narration of borders, the narration of security plays major role. Migration and the question of open, permeable borders have become one of the most important security narrations of our everyday life.
References
Amin S. (2004), The Liberal Virus – Permanent War and the Americanization of the World, London.
Amin S. (2006), Beyond US Hegemony? Assessing the Prospects for a Multipolar World, Lebanon.
Balzacq T. (2005), Thre Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context, „European Journal of International Relations”, Vol, No. 2.
Bauman Z. (2005), Liquid life, Malden.
Bauman Z. (2006a), Liquid Fear, Malden.
Bauman Z. (2006b), Liquid Modernity, Malden.
Bauman Z. (2011), Collateral Damage – Social Inequalities in a Global Age, Malden.
Beck U. (2007), Moc a protiváha moci v globálním věku: Nová ekonomie světové politiky, Praha.
Bourdieu P. (1996), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, USA.
Brunkhorst H. (2005), Solidarity – From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community, Massachusetts.
Bull H. (1977), The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, London.
Buzan B., Waever O. (2003), Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge–New York–Melbourne–Madrid–Cape Town–Singapore–São Paulo.
Buzan B., Waever O., Wilde de J. (1998), Security a New Framework for Analysis, Boulder–London.
Castells I. (2004), The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture, The Rise of the Network Society, Vol. I, Massachusetts–Oxford.
Columba P., Vaughan-Williams N. (2010), Critical Security Studies: An introduction, London–New York.
Connolly W. (1991), Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political paradox, Minneapolis.
Delanty G. (2006), Borders in a Changing Europe: Dynamics of Openness and Closure, „Comparative European Politics”, Vol. 4, No. 2/3: 183–202.
Dunkley G. (2004), Free Trade: Myth, Reality and Alternatives, New York.
Dvorsky G., Hughes J. (2008), Postgenderism: Beyond the Gender Binary, „Institute for Ethics and Emerginc Technologies”, Vol. 20: 44–57.
Fergusson N. (2017), The Square and the Tower: Networks, Hierarchies and the Struggle for Global Power, London.
Flockhart T. (2016), The coming multi-order world, „Contemporary Security Policy”, Vol. 37, No. 1: 3–30.
Foucault M. (1972/2004), The Archeology of Knowledge, London.
Fukuyama F. (1989), Have we reached the end of history?, Santa Monica, CA.
Furedi F. (2007), Culture of Fear Revisited: Risk-taking and the Morality of Low Expectation, London–New York.
Furedi F. (2021), Why Borders Matter: Why Humanity Must Relearn the Art of Drawing Boundaries, London–New York.
Gandhi L. (1998), Postcolonial theory – A critical introduction, New South Wales.
Hall S. (1997), Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, London.
Hardy C., Thomas R. (2014), Discourse in a Material World, https://orca.cf.ac.uk/56767/1/Thomas%20PCP_Discourse-and-Materiality_Final-v11-sent_to_JMS.pdf
Harvey D. (2011), The Enigma of Capital and the Crises of Capitalism, London.
Houtum van H. (2012), Remapping Borders, in: A Companion to Border Studies, (eds.) M. T. Wilson, H. Donnan, Chicester.
Keller J. (2006), Soumrak sociálního státu, Praha.
Kiely R. (2005), Empire in the Age of Globalisation: US Hegemony and Neoliberal Disorder, London.
Laclau E. (2007), Emancipation(s), London.
Miklósvölgyi J. (2018), Távozz tőlem, Sátán! Avagy a parazitákról festő szemmel, Budapest.
Mouffe Ch. (2000), The Democratic Paradox, London.
Mouffe Ch. (2005), On the Political, New York.
Neumann I. B. (1996), Self and Other in International Relations, „European Journal of International Relations”, Vol. 2, No. 2: 139–174.
Neumann I. B. (2011), Our Culture and all the Others: Intercultural and International Relations, in: Culture and External Relations: Europe and Beyond, (eds.) J. Bátora, M. Mokre, Oxon–New York.
Nye S. J., Lynn-Jones M. S. (1988), International Security Studies: A Report of a Conference on the State of the Field, „International Security”, Vol. 12, No. 4.
Peoples C., Vaughan-Williams N. (2010), Critical Security Studies: An Introduction, London–New York.
Robin C. (2004), Fear: The History of a Political Idea, Oxford–New York.
Rorty R. (1999), Philosophy and Social Hope, London.
Russel B. (1945), A History of Western Philosophy, London.
Salter B. M. (2002), Barbarians and Civilization in International Relations, London.
Stivachtis Y. (2018), Introducing the English School in International Relations Theory, https://www.e-ir.info/pdf/72836.
Tester K. (1993), The life and times of postmodernity, London–New York.
Wæver O. (1995), Securitization and Desecuritization, in: On Security, (eds.) R. D. Lipschutz, New York.
Walt M. S. (1991), The Renaissance of Security Studies, „International Studies Quarterly”, Vol. 35, No. 2.
Waltz N. K. (1964), The Stability of a Bipolar World, „Daedalus”, Vol. 93, No. 3: 881–909.
Watson A. (1992), The Evolution of International Society: A comparative historical analysis, London–New York.
Williams C. M. (2003), Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics, „International Studies Quarterly”, Vol. 47, No. 4.
Wuthnow R. (1989), Meaning and Moral Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis, Berkeley.
Žižek S. (2017), Refugees, Terror and Other Troubles with the Neighbors: Against the Double Blackmail, London.
Hungary’s 10-point action plan for the management of the migration crisis, “About Hungary”, 18.04.2016, https://abouthungary.hu/news-in-brief/here-it-is-hungarys-10-point-action-plan-for-the-management-of-the-migration-crisis (25 May 2021).
Bist Du gegen den Frieden?, “Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung”, 11.07.2016, https://miniszterelnok.hu/bist-du-gegen-den-frieden/ (25 May 2021).
Öt nagy támadást kell kivédeni idén, “Miniszterelnök”, 10.02.2017, https://miniszterelnok.hu/ot-nagy-tamadast-kell-kivedeni-iden/ (25 May 2021).
Orbán Viktor – bejegyzések, Facebook, 19.10.2017, https://m.facebook.com/watch/?v=10155634477996093&_rdr (25 May 2021).
Ideje, hogy az európai szolidaritás a határvédelem ügyében is érvényesüljön, “Miniszterelnök”, 1.09.2017, https://miniszterelnok.hu/ideje-hogy-az-europai-szolidaritas-a-hatarvedelem-ugyeben-is-ervenyesuljon/ (25 May 2021).
Orbán Viktor: Szeretem ezt az országot, és nem szeretném, ha külső parancsra valaki megváltoztatná, “Origo”, 22.09.2016, https://www.origo.hu/itthon/20160921-orban-viktor-interju.html?fbclid=IwAR3rSrw99m5sBZ9cSQQx6469DRPt-uvfT1JDc7wk_ecGu8UkbFezux5O5zE (25 May 2021).
Orbán Viktor – bejegyzések, Facebook, 06.01.2018, https://m.facebook.com/watch/?v=10155845215041093&_rdr (25 May 2021).
Önök akarták a migránsokat, mi nem, “Miniszterelnök”, 08.01.2018, https://miniszterelnok.hu/onok-akartak-a-migransokat-mi-nem/ (25 May 2021).
Orbán Viktor – bejegyzések, Facebook, 19.02.2018, https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=10155968890151093 (25 May 2021).
Agyonnyomná a fejlesztéseinket, ha bevándorlóországgá válnánk, “Miniszterelnök”, 09.03.2018, https://miniszterelnok.hu/agyonnyomna-a-fejleszteseinket-ha-bevandorloorszagga-valnank/ (25 May 2021.)
Minden eszköz rendelkezésre áll az ország megvédéséhez, “Miniszterelnök”, 22.06.2018, https://miniszterelnok.hu/minden-eszkoz-rendelkezesre-all-az-orszag-megvedesehez/ (25 May 2021).
Hatályba lépett a bevándorlási különadó, “Index”, 25.08.2018, https://index.hu/belfold/2018/08/25/hatalyba_lepett_a_bevandorlasi_kulonado/ (5 May 2021).
Orbán Viktor – bejegyzések, Facebook, 23.02.2018, https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=10155979821736093 (25 May 2021).
Orbán Viktor interjúja a Welt am Sonntag című újságnak, “Miniszterelnök”, 03.03.2019, https://miniszterelnok.hu/orban-viktor-interjuja-a-welt-am-sonntag-cimu-ujsagnak/?fbclid=IwAR2LKZdICuIdo2AP9w-itd5YhUZQ4meMp1IIXEB10E6ldYpytFNSXb7U8kQ (25 May 2021).
Orbán Viktor – bejegyzések, Facebook, 05.04.2019, https://m.facebook.com/watch/?v=387664702080721&_rdr (25 May 2021).
Felszámolja a kormány a tranzitzónákat, “Index”, 21.05.2020, https://index.hu/belfold/2020/05/21/tranzitzona_megszuntetes_emberi_jogok_europai_unio_birosaga_strasbourgi_birosag/ (25 May 2021).
Orbán: sosem voltunk multikulturális társadalom, “Index”, 19.05.2015, https://index.hu/kulfold/eurologus/2015/05/19/orban_sosem_voltunk_multikulturalis_tarsadalom/ (25 May 2021).
Orbán Viktor mindenkit óv a multikulturális Európától, “Index”, 02.06.2015, https://index.hu/belfold/2015/06/02/orban_viktor_mindenkit_ov_a_multikulturalis_europatol/ (25 May 2021).
Orbán Viktor teljes írása a Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitungban, “Magyar idők”, 14.11.2015, https://www.magyaridok.hu/belfold/akit-lerohannak-az-senkit-sem-tud-befogadni-7288/?fbclid=IwAR2QXK-vFIhB0q82wySbnEMvNr3yVv5XdyjkvLhua64xum8ZlsXKyKKAUcM (25 May 2021).
License
Articles published in "Przegląd Strategiczny" are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. License (CC BY 4.0). They may be copied, redistributed and shared only if appropriate credit is given.