Cultural Security of Ukraine
PDF

Keywords

culture
cultural security
Ukraine
nation
language
national identity
threats to cultural security
linguistic and cultural space

How to Cite

Krasivskyy, O., & Pidberezhnyk, N. (2021). Cultural Security of Ukraine. Strategic Review, (14), 471–488. https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2021.1.27

Abstract

Condition and problems of ensuring the cultural security of Ukraine were analyzed. Hypothesis that ensuring development and sustainability of the cultural sphere, formation of a single Ukrainian socio-cultural space based on Ukrainian language, historical memory, spiritual values, cultural traditions is one of priority national interests of the Ukrainian state at the present stage was put forward. Research methodology is based on the principles of objectivity and systematicity. During the research, methods of scientific learning of socio-political phenomena and processes were used, in particular: analysis, synthesis, systematization, empirical, and system-structural methods. The authors prove that cultural traditions, historical memory, self-consciousness and language are key factors that constitute and consolidate a nation, and threats to the nation’s cultural interests can jeopardize its existence. It was found that the centuries-old policy of de-ethnicization and assimilation of Ukrainian ethnos by foreign states has led to deformation and russification of the national linguistic and cultural space of Ukraine, loss of ethnic identity based on the language factor of the titular Ukrainian ethnos, deepening the spiritual crisis of Ukrainian society. It is determined that the key threats in the field of cultural security of Ukraine today are the following: Russia’s hybrid war against Ukraine, formation of information and cultural space of Ukraine under the influence of foreign information flows, imperfection of humanitarian policy in the context of cultivating Ukrainian national values, low level of development of cultural industries, dominance of foreign cultural and artistic products, control over Ukrainian media by financial and industrial groups that often take an anti-Ukrainian position. It was proved that the measures to assert and popularize Ukrainian language as the state language, ensure intercultural communication and interethnic socialization of ethnic subjects of Ukrainian society, formation of national-patriotic education, creation of competitive innovative cultural products and their popularization in the world should be priority directions of the state policy of ensuring cultural security of Ukraine.

https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2021.1.27
PDF

References

Aslanov S. A. (2016), Polityko-pravovi zasady etnopolitychnoi stabilnosti derzhavy v umovakh hlobalnykh vyklykiv, Kyiv.

Bakhov I. S. (2012), Mizhkulturna komunikatsiia v konteksti hlobalizatsiinoho dialohu kultur, “Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy”, Vyp. 2, http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vnadps_2012_2_3 (12.11.2020).

Balanda A. L. (2006), Sotsialni aspekty natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy, „Derzhavna bezpeka Ukrainy”, No. 1 (5).

Bilshe 90% hromadian (2017), Bilshe 90% hromadian nazvaly sebe ukraintsiamy za natsionalnistiu, http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2017/06/17/7147226/ (24.10.2020).

Chyselnist naiavnoho naselennia Ukrainy na 1 sichnia 2017 roku, http://database.ukrcensus.gov.ua/PXWEB2007/ukr/publ_new1/2017/zb_chnn_0117.pdf (21.10.2020).

Demchuk R. (2017), Mifolohema u konteksti modeliuvannia natsionalnoi identychnosti, “Kulturolohichni idei”, No. 11.

Doslidzhennia: movna sytuatsiia v Ukraini, “KANTAR”, https://tns-ua.com/news/doslidzhennya-movna-situatsiya-v-ukrayini (16.11.2020).

Etnopolitychna bezpeka Ukrainy (2015), Etnopolitychna bezpeka Ukrainy: polityko-pravovi mekhanizmy protydii etnopolitychnii dezintehratsii derzhavy: Naukova zapyska, Kyiv.

Hibernau M. (2012), Identychnist natsii, Kyiv.

Karaulna N. V. (1998), Dukhovnist i samovyznachennia osobystosti, in: Materialy „Dniv nauky – 1998”, Kyiv.

Karlova V. (2011), Mistse ta rol humanitarnoho prostoru derzhavy u formuvanni natsionalnoi samosvidomosti, „Visnyk natsionalnoi akademii derzhavnoho upravlinnia pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy”, Vyp. 1, http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vnadu_2011_1_7 (3.10.2020).

Kolodii A. (2013), Sotsiietalna kultura yak chynnyk natsionalnoi konsolidatsii, in: Konsolidatsiia ukrainskoho narodu: konstytutsiino-pravovi aspekty. Zbirnyk statei za materialamy naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii 28 liutoho–1 bereznia 2013 r., Lviv.

Koretska A. I. (2003), Sotsialno-osvitni chynnyky formuvannia dukhovnosti sobystosti v suchasnomu ukrainskomu suspilstvi, Kyiv.

Kurhuzov A. O. (2004), Mova yak zasib sotsiokulturnoi samoidentyfikatsii osobystosti, Zaporizhzhia.

Maiboroda O. M (2002), Etnopolitychna sytuatsiia v Ukraini: rehionalnyi vymir, in: Spryiannia poshyrenniu tolerantnosti v polietnichnomu suspilstvi, Kyiv.

Mala entsyklopediia etnoderzhavoznavstva (1996), Mala entsyklopediia etnoderzhavoznavstva, Kyiv.

Oleksiuk O. M. (2004), Pidhotovka fakhivtsiv sotsiokulturnoi sfery v dukhovno-svitohliadnomu dyskursi, http://www.knukim.edu.ua/conferences_2004_proceedings_oleksyuk.htm/ (8.10.2020).

Onishchenko K., Klasyfikatsiia ta osoblyvosti polityko-pravovoho statusu terytorialnykh avtonomii, „Derzhava i pravo”, Vyp. 45.

Perepysuvannia istorii – skladova propahandystskoi viiny Putina – ekspert, https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/26696327.html (5.12.2020).

Potentsialni zahrozy rehionalnoho separatyzmu v Ukraini, http://www.niss.gov.ua/articles/1478/ (15.09.2020).

Pro kilkist ta sklad naselennia Ukrainy (2001), Pro kilkist ta sklad naselennia Ukrainy za pidsumkamy Vseukrainskoho perepysu naselennia 2001 roku, http://2001.ukrcensus.gov.ua/results/general/nationality/ (10.09.2020).

Pro zabezpechennia funktsionuvannia ukrainskoi movy yak derzhavnoi (2019), Zakon Ukrainy, Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady (VVR), № 21, st.81.

Shcherbyna V. M. (2013), Mizhkulturna komunikatsiia u suchasnomu sotsiokulturnomu prostori, “Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu Ukrainy «Kyivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut»”, No. 2.

Smith A. (1978), The Diffusion and Nationalism: Some Historical and sociological perspectives, “British Journal of Sociology”, Vol. 29, No. 2.

Smit E. D. (2010), Kulturni osnovy natsii: iierarkhiia, zapovit i respublika, Kyiv.

Stratehiia (2020), Stratehiia natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy. «Bezpeka liudyny-bezpeka Ukrainy», Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 14 veresnia 2020 r. No. 392/2020, https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/3922020-35037 (8.12.2020).

Stratehiia (2015), Stratehiia natsionalno-patriotychnoho vykhovannia ditei ta molodi na 2016–2020 roky, Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 13 zhovtnia 2015 roku No. 580/2015 http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/580/2015 (18.11.2020).

Sushyi O. (2012), Kulturno-symvolichni zasady natsionalnoi identychnosti, „Derzhavne upravlinnia: teoriia ta praktyka”, No. 2.

Tuzhanskyi D. (2017), Shcho khovaietsia za ideieiu avtonomii uhortsiv? Ryzyky ta mozhlyvosti dlia Ukrainy, https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/articles/2017/03/29/7063755/view_print/ (15.09.2020).

Zakon pro movu: fakty, pohliady ta dumky, https://vseosvita.ua/news/zakon-pro-movu-fakti-pogladi-ta-dumki-2518.html (4.12.2020).