Keywords
global security
security challenges
export of neoauthoritarianism
neoauthoritarian intervention
tools of neoauthoritarian influence
How to Cite
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to determine the features of neoauthoritarianism as a political regime, its tools, and consequences for global security. It is reasoned that neoauthoritarianism is an undemocratic system of methods and means of exercising centralized state power, which is characterized by the formalisation of democratic principles, institutions and procedures, and the use of digitalization to realize the goals of the regime. The features and tools of neoauthoritarianism are systematized, and the probable consequences of neoauthoritarianism on a global scale are assessed. The following features of neoauthoritarian regimes are determined: reduction of the role of ideology; integration into the global capitalist economy; imitation of a democratic facade; covert forms of pressure and control, manipulation, propaganda; providing a legal basis for any undemocratic initiatives; using the advantages of democratization, globalization, digitalization to achieve the regime’s destructive goals, etc. The following tools of neoauthoritarian influence are determined: power tools, tools of influence within the scope of “soft power,” tools of subversion, tools for changing values, electoral tools, tools of pressure on international organizations, etc. It is proven that due to neoauthoritarian intervention, the risks to global security are increased. The main consequence of ascending neoauthoritarianism on a global scale is the fact that neoauthoritarian regimes have endangered democracy as the dominant global model, reshaping the global security architecture.
References
Adler P. S., Adly A., Armanios D. E. et al. (2023), Authoritarianism, Populism, and the Global Retreat of Democracy: A Curated Discussion, “Journal of Management Inquiry”, Vol. 32, No. 1: 3–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926221119395
Allison R. (2017), Russia and the Post-2014 International Legal Order: Revisionism and Realpolitik, “International Affairs”, Vol. 93, No. 1: 519–543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix061
Anthony M., Iii V. A., Gauchan N. (2019), Dystopia is Now: Digital Authoritarianism and Human Rights in Asia, “Global Campus Human Rights Journal”, Vol. 3, No. 2: 269–286.
Applebaum A., Pomerantsev P., Smith M., Colliver C. (2017), “Make Germany Great Again” – Kremlin, Alt-Right and International Influences in the 2017 German Elections, London School of Economics Arena Program, and the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, London.
Awad H. (2022), Egypt’s New Authoritarianism from an Institutionalist Perspective: Formal-Informal Interactions Before and After the Egyptian Revolution, “British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies”, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/13530194.2022.2113503?needAccess=true&role=button (05.01.2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2022.2113503
Babones S. (2018), The New Authoritarianism: Trump, Populism, and the Tyranny of Experts, Polity, Cambridge.
Bader J. (2015), Propping up Dictators? Economic Cooperation from China and Its Impact on Authoritarian Persistence in Party and Non-party Regimes, “European Journal of Political Research”, Vol. 54, No. 4: 655–672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12082
Cooper L. (2021), Authoritarian Contagion: The Global Threat to Democracy, Bristol University Press, Bristol. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56687/9781529217810
Dahrendorf R. (2006), Versuchungen der Unfreiheit (Die Intellektuellen in Zeiten der Prufung), CH Beck Verlag, Munchen. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110505283-004
Dragu T., Lupu Y. (2021), Digital Authoritarianism and the Future of Human Rights, “International Organization”, Vol. 75, No. 4: 991–1017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000624
European Parliament, Hungary: Member States Have an Obligation to End Attacks on EU Values. Press Releases, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20220711IPR35008/hungary-member-states-have-an-obligation-to-end-attacks-on-eu-values (13.07.2022).
Ginsburg T. (2020), Authoritarian International Law?, “American Journal of International Law”, Vol. 114, No. 2: 221–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2020.3
Glukhova A. (2019), New Authoritarianism in the XXI Century: Global Trends and Russian Case Study, “Wschód Europy”, No. 5: 13–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/we.2019.5.1.13-32
Guriev S., Treisman D. (2022), Spin Dictators: The Changing Face of Tyranny in the 21st Century, Princeton University Press, Princeton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691224466
Jones M. O. (2022), Digital Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Deception, Disinformation and Social Media, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Jordan B. (2020), Authoritarianism and How to Counter It, Palgrave Pivot, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17211-4
Jurczyszyn Ł. (2018), Zmagania Francji z Polityką Deradykalizacyjną, Collegium Civitas, Warszawa.
Kendall-Taylor A., Frantz E., Wright J. (2020), The Digital Dictators: How Technology Strengthens Autocracy, “Foreign Affairs”, 99, No. 2: 103–115.
Khoma N., Vozniuk Y. (2021), Turkey’s Middle East Policy: Vectors, Aims and Results, “Studia Politica”, Vol. 21, No. 2: 578–601.
Krastev I. (2011), Paradoxes of the New Authoritarianism, “Journal of Democracy”, Vol. 22, No. 2: 5–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2011.0027
Kruglashov A., Shvydiuk S. (2019), Rosyjska ingerencja w wybory: hybrydowe zagrożenia dla democracji, Cerniowce.
LaBelle M. C. (2023), Energy as a Weapon of War: Lessons from 50 Years of Energy Interdependence, “Global Policy”, Vol. 14, No. 3: 531–547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13235
Lendvai-Bainton N., Szelewa D. (2021), Governing New Authoritarianism: Populism, Nationalism and Radical Welfare Reforms in Hungary and Poland, “Social Policy and Administration”, Vol. 55, No. 4: 559–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12642
Levitsky S., Way L. A. (2010), Competetive Authoritariansism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War, Problems of International Politics, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Lewis D. G. (2020), Russia’s New Authoritarianism. Putin and the Politics of Order, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474454766.001.0001
Li H. (2015), Political Thought and China’s Transformation. Ideas Shaping Reform in Post-Mao China, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Müller J.-W. (2022), What’s New About the New Authoritarianism?, “Foreign Policy”, 06.08.2022.
O’Connor S., Hanson F., Currey E., Beattie T. (2020), Cyber-enabled Foreign Interference in Elections and Referendums, Australian Strategic Policy Institute, Canberra.
Repucci S., Slipowitz A. (2022), Freedom in the World 2022. The Global Expansion of Authoritarian Rule, https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2022-02/FIW_2022_PDF_Booklet_Digital_Final_Web.pdf (07.12.2022).
Richardson S. (2022), China’s Influence on the Global Human Rights System. Assessing China’s Growing Role in the World, Brookings Institution, Washington.
Schedler A. (2013), The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism, Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199680320.001.0001
Szulecki K., Overland I. (2023), Russian Nuclear Energy Diplomacy and its Implications for Energy Security in the Context of the War in Ukraine, “Nature Energy”, Vol. 8: 413–421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01228-5
Treisman D., Guriev S. (2015), The New Authoritarianism, https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/new-authoritarianism (12.01.2023).
Walker C. (2014), Authoritarian Regimes are Changing How the World Defines Democracy, “Washington Post”, 13.06.2014.
Walker C. (2016), The Authoritarian Threat: The Hijacking of “Soft Power”, “Journal of Democracy”, Vol. 27, No. 1: 49–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0007
Waring A. (ed.) (2021), The New Authoritarianism, Vol. 3: A Risk Analysis of the Corporate/Radical-Right Axis, ibidem-Verlag, Hannover.
Waring А. (ed.) (2018), The New Authoritarianism, Vol. 1: A Risk Analysis of the US Alt-Right Phenomenon, ibidem Press, Stuttgart.
Waring А. (ed.) (2019), The New Authoritarianism, Vol. 2: A Risk Analysis of the European Alt-Right Phenomenon, ibidem Press, Stuttgart.
Wiatr J. J. (ed.) (2019), New Authoritarianism: Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century, Verlag Barbara Budrich, Toronto. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvdf08xx
Wright T. (2017), All Measures Short of War: The Contest for the Twenty-First Century and the Future of American Power, Yale University Press, New Haven.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nataliia Khoma, Maiia Nikolayeva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles published in "Przegląd Strategiczny" are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. License (CC BY 4.0). They may be copied, redistributed and shared only if appropriate credit is given.