Current Issues of Peace and Security Taking Into Account Aggressive Policy of the Russian Federation
PDF

Keywords

international law
international security
Russian aggression
Russian-Ukrainian war
UN Charter
signs of aggression

How to Cite

Nikiforenko, V., & Kuryliuk, Y. (2023). Current Issues of Peace and Security Taking Into Account Aggressive Policy of the Russian Federation. Strategic Review, (16), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2023.1.20

Abstract

This article examines the issue of violation of the principle of territorial integrity (integrity) or political independence of states from 1946 to 2022. The approach is based on the study and understanding of domestic and foreign literary sources, statistics, legal acts. So, the historic, comparative, formal juridical and prognostic methods will be used. Russia gained the status of an independent entity in the international arena immediately after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Almost immediately, it began to show signs of aggression. To promote its geopolitical ambitions, it uses gaps in international law, information and psychological measures, corruption, mercenaries, collaborators, blackmail, the law of force, and tries to rewrite history. The course of military conflicts involving Russia in Moldova, Chechnya, Georgia, Syria and Ukraine shows that the scale of violations of international treaties, human rights and the rules of warfare has increased in line with the strengthening of its military capabilities. During the hostilities on the territory of independent Ukraine, Russia showed a complete list of signs of aggression, as defined by UN General Assembly Resolution 3314 (XXIX) of December 14, 1974. This shows that before the armed attack on Ukraine, the aggressor was convinced that it could not be brought to justice and punished. It also hoped that his next victim would not be able to receive international political, economic, military and social assistance. Some actions of Russia in the international arena have signs of state terrorism. During the last ten years, a fascist regime has formed in Russia. The abuse of the veto did not lead to the expulsion of the aggressor country from the UN SC.

To stop Russia’s aggression and prevent similar developments in the future, the issues of improving international law, bringing to justice the political and military leadership of the republic of Belarus and Russia, improving the UN Charter, the powers of the UN General Assembly, depriving Russia of the right to participate in peacekeeping operations.

https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2023.1.20
PDF

References

Agreement on the Maintenance of Peaceful and Security Guarantees between the Republic of Moldova and Transnistria, Tiraspol, 05 July 1995, https://mid.gospmr.org/sites/default/files/image/1995/07/1279115397soglashenie-mira.jpg (11.05.2022).

Agreement on the Principles for a Peaceful Settlement of the Armed Conflict in the Dniester Region of the Republic of Moldova, Moscow, 21 July 1992, https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/MD%20RU_920000_AgreementPrinciplesPpeacefulSettlementDniestrConflict.pdf (11.05.2022).

Åtland K. (2021), Redrawing borders, reshaping orders: Russia’s quest for dominance in the Black Sea region, “European Security”, Vol. 30(2): 305–324, https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1872546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1872546

Babin B., Chvaliuk A., Plotnikov O. (2021), Attempted Annexation of Crimea and Maritime Environment Legal Protection, “Lex Portus”, Vol. 7(1): 31–52, https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.7.1.2021.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.7.1.2021.2

Decision No 1117. Deployment of an OSCE Special monitoring mission to Ukraine, 21 March 2014, https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/d/6/116747.pdf (11.05.2022).

Denber R. (2004), “Glad to be Deceived”: the International Community and Chechnya, “Human Rights Watch World Report”, https://www.hrw.org/legacy/wr2k4/7.htm#_Toc58744956 (11.05.2022).

Green J. A., Henderson C., Ruys T. (2022), Russia’s attack on Ukraine and the jus ad bellum, “Journal on the Use of Force and International Law”, Vol. 9(1): 4–30, https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2056803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2056803

Horbulin V. (2016), National Institute for Strategic Studies: Russian blitzkrieg against Ukraine has failed, https://www.rnbo.gov.ua/en/Diialnist/2399.html (11.05.2022).

Judgment on the interpretation of Article 11 of the Constitution (Complaint no. 37b/2014, Chişinău, 2 May 2017, http://www.rulac.org/assets/downloads/Cst_Court_of_Moldova_Judgment_Neutrality.pdf (11.05.2022).

Kosienkowski M. (2014), Naddniestrze a bezpieczeństwo Ukrainy, “Securitologia”, No. 1: 93–104, http://doi.org/10.5604/18984509.1129714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/18984509.1129714

Kresin O., Kresina I. (2021), Illegal Control Over the Territory in International Law and the Status of Donbas Determination, “Przegląd Strategiczny”, No. 14: 279–296, https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2021.1.16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2021.1.16

Memorandum on security assurances in connection with Ukraine’s accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Budapest, 5 December 1994, https://www.pircenter.org/media/content/files/12/13943175580.pdf (11.05.2022).

Minzarari D. (2014), Crimea Crisis Exposes Severe Deficiencies in Transnistria Negotiations For-mat, „Eurasia Daily Monitor”, Vol. 11(67), https://jamestown.org/program/crimea-crisis-exposes-severe-deficiencies-in-transnistria-negotiations-format/ (26.11.2023).

NATO says Russia has big force at Ukraine’s border, worries over Transdniestria, http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/23/us-ukraine-crisis-nato-idUSBREA2M07O20140323 (26.11.2023).

Nikiforenko V., Nguen A. (2021), International cooperation as migration management instrument, “Migration & Law”, Vol. 1(2): 5–18, http://doi.org/10.32752/2786-5185-2021-1-2-5-18 (11.05.2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32752/2786-5185-2021-1-2-5-18

OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM) Daily Report 53/2022, 7 Mar 2022, https://reliefweb.int/report/ukraine/osce-special-monitoring-mission-ukraine-smm-daily-report-532022-issued-6-march-2022 (11.05.2022).

Orlova V. (2022), Zelensky explained why control over Ukraine is important for Russia, https://www.unian.ua/politics/zelenskiy-poyasniv-chomu-kontrol-nad-ukrajinoyu-vazhliviy-dlya-rosiji-novini-ukraine-11860221.html (11.05.2022).

Petersen A. (2008), The 1992–93 Georgia-Abkhazia War: A Forgotten Conflict, “Caucasian Review of International Affairs”, Vol. 2(4): 187–199.

Petrechenko S., Kuryliuk Y., Yuryk O. (2021), Legal aspects of medical care and rehabilitation of war veterans in Ukraine, “Pharmacologyonline”, Vol. 2, https://pharmacologyonline.silae.it/files/newsletter/2021/vol2/PhOL_2021_2_NL001_Petrechenko.pdf (11.05.2022).

Resolution CM/Res on legal and financial consequences of the suspension of the Russian Federation from its rights of representation in the Council of Europe, 2 March 2022, https://rm.coe.int/2022-cm-resolution-1/1680a5b463 (11.05.2022).

Resolution No 1647, Implementation of Resolution 1633 (2008) on the consequences of the war between Georgia and Russia, 28 January 2009, https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=17708&lang=en (11.05.2022).

Resolution No 3314 (ХХIХ), Definition of Aggression United Nations General Assembly, 14 December 1974, http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/instree/GAres3314.html (11.05.2022).

Resolution No 242 United Nations Security Council, 22 November 1967, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/90717?ln=en (11.05.2022).

Resolution No 465 United Nations Security Council, 1 March 1980, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/11767/?ln=en (11.05.2022).

Resolution No 497 United Nations Security Council, 17 December 1981, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/26751?ln=en (11.05.2022).

Resolution No 743 United Nations Security Council, New York, 21 February 1992, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/137965/files/S_RES_743%281992%29-EN.pdf (11.05.2022).

Resolution No 849 United Nations Security Council, New York, 9 July 1993, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/169495/files/S_RES_849%281993%29-EN.pdf?ln=en (11.05.2022).

Resolution No 1244 United Nations Security Council, New York, 10 June 1999, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/274488?ln=en (11.05.2022).

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Rome, 17 July 1998, https://legal.un.org/icc/statute/99_corr/cstatute.htm (11.05.2022).

Secrieru S. (2011), The Transnistrian conflict – new opportunities and old obstacles for trust building (2009–2010), “Southeast European and Black Sea Studies”, Vol. 11(3): 241–263, https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2011.589150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2011.589150

Shekinsky N. (2016), Syria: chronicle of the conflict, https://news.un.org/ru/audio/2016/03/1032741 (11.05.2022).

Szklarski A. (2020), Kulisy rosyjskiej polityki wobec Republiki Czeczenii i jej konsekwencje, “Rocznik Administracji Publicznej”, No. 6: 203–224, http://dx.doi.org/10.4467/24497800rap.20.011.12905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/24497800RAP.20.011.12905

The North Atlantic Treaty, Washington D.C., 4 April 1949, https://www.nato.int/cps/uk/natohq/official_texts_17120.htm?selectedLocale=en (11.05.2022).

The State Duma has ratified an agreement on the deployment of Russian air groups in Syria, https://www.interfax.ru/russia/531561 (11.05.2022).

United Nations Charter, San Francisco, 26 June 1945, https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text (11.05.2022).

Vendik Y. (2018), Do the United States and its allies have the right to strike Syria?, https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-43768348 (11.05.2022).

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Vienna, 23 May 1969, https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf (11.05.2022).

Wańczyk K. (2006), Polityka Federacji Rosyjskiej wobec Czeczenii, in: Czeczenia – Rosja: mity i rzeczywistość, (eds.) J. Brodowski, M. Smoleń, Kraków.

What can the UN do? 5 of your questions answered, 5 April 2022, https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/04/1115592 (11.05.2022).