Abstract
This paper presents an analysis of the social science development concept of Immanuel Wallerstein. In general terms we can say that the development of social sciences was based on a process of emancipation of individual subjects of research and validation of research methods.I. Wallerstein drew attention to the process of emancipation of individual disciplines, therefore we can talk about the separation of philosophy, followed by social sciences and, negatively evaluated by I. Wallerstein, applied social sciences. With the constitution of individual disciplines we dealt with the process of polarising methodological positions, which can be roughly described as the concept of two cultures. The text describes the following issues: (1) the directions of emancipation of scientific disciplines, (2) the processes of emancipation of scientific disciplines, (3) the dynamics of changes in social sciences, (4) the effects of changes occurring in sciences. In addition to the main assumptions of I. Wallerstein on science, the text attempts to confront these assumptions with the achievements of T. S. Kuhn, R. K. Merton and C. W. Mills.
The aim of the article is to point out the implications for the “theory of international relations” deriving from the general trends in the development of social sciences. This issue has come down to only selected issues of: microscopisation, idealisation, metaphorical use, deformation, transcendentalisation, fictionalisation and fetishisation of notions in the “theory of international relations”.
References
Althusser L., Ideologie i aparaty ideologiczne państwa, http://www.filozofia.uw.edu.pl/skfm/publikacje/althusser05.pdf (30.11.2011).
Beckford J., Teoria społeczna a religia, NOMOS, Kraków 2006.
Brubaker R., The Limits of Rationality: An Essay on the Social and Moral Thought of Max Weber, George Allen and Unwin, London 1984.
Clifton Ch. S., Encyklopedia herezji i heretyków, Athens, Poznań 1996.
Dick P. K., Minority Report, Golancz, London 2002.
Goldfrank W. L., Paradigm Regained? The Rules of Wallersiein’s World – The Method, “Journal of World – Systems. Research” 2000, Vol. XI, No. 2.
Hajduk Z., Metodologia nauki, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski, Lublin 2002.
Kimball R., “The Two Cultures” Today, in: The New Criterion, http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/-The-Two-Cultures--today-4882 (30.10.2011).
Kozyr-Kowalski S., Uniwersytet a rynek, UAM, Poznań 2005.
Kuhn T. S., Struktura rewolucji naukowych, Aletheia, Warszawa 2009.
Merton R. K., Teoria socjologiczna i struktura społeczna, PWN, Warszawa 2002.
Mills C. W., Wyobraźnia socjologiczna, PWN, Warszawa 2008.
Nowak L., On the Concealed Unity of Social and Natural Sciences, http://strebski.dyktatura.info/wp-content/texts/philosophy/Nowak02.pdf (6.11.2012).
Nussbaum M. C., W trosce o człowieczeństwo: klasyczna obrona reformy kształcenia ogólnego, NDSzW, Wrocław 2008.
Popper K. R., W poszukiwaniu lepszego świata, KiW, Warszawa 1997.
Russell B., Religia i nauka, AND KIP, Warszawa 2006.
Snow C. P., The Two Cultures, Cambridge University Press, London 2001.
Sokal A., Bricmont J., Modne bzdury. O nadużywaniu pojęć z zakresu nauk ścisłych przez postmodernistycznych intelektualistów, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa 2004.
Wallerstein I., Analiza Systemów – Światów. Wprowadzenie, Dialog, Warszawa 2007.
Wallerstein I., Europejski uniwersalizm. Retoryka władzy, Scholar, Warszawa 2007.
Wallerstein I., Koniec świata jaki znamy, Scholar, Warszawa 2004.
Weber M., Gospodarka i społeczeństwo, PWN, Warszawa 2002.
Yates F. A., Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition, Routledge, London 2001.
License
Articles published in "Przegląd Strategiczny" are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. License (CC BY 4.0). They may be copied, redistributed and shared only if appropriate credit is given.