Abstract
Reformation theology induced a profound thanatological crisis in the semiotics of the human being and the body. The Protestant Reformation discontinued numerous practices of intercession and communal ritual, and the early modern subject was left vulnerable in the face of death. The English Renaissance stage played out these anxieties within the larger context of the epistemological uncertainties of the age, employing violence and the anatomization of the body as representational techniques. While theories of language and tragic poetry oscillated between different ideas of imitatio (granting priority to the model) and mimesis (with preference for the creative and individual nature of the copy), the new anatomical interest and dissective perspectives also had their effects on the rhetorical practices of revenge tragedies. In the most shocking moments of these plays, rhetorical tropes suddenly turn into grisly reality, and figures of speech become demetaphorized, literalized. In a double anatomy of body and mind, English Renaissance revenge tragedy simultaneously employs and questions the emblematic and poetic traditions of representation, and the ensuing indeterminacy and ambiguity open paths for a new mimesis.
References
Bacon, Francis. 2000 [1605]. The advancement of learning. Edited by Michael Kiernan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Marston, John. 2012 [1602]. Antonio’s revenge. In Emma Smith (ed.), Five revenge tragedies, 160–217. London: Penguin Classics.
Middleton, Thomas. 2012 [1607]. The revenger’s tragedy. In Emma Smith (ed.), Five revenge tragedies, 284–357. London: Penguin Classics.
Peacham, Henry. 1593. The garden of eloquence, 2nd edn, sig. C2v. London: Richard Field.
Shakespeare, William. 1972 [1603]. Hamlet. In Blakemore Evans (ed.), The Riverside Shakespeare. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Shakespeare, William. 1995 [1594]. Titus Andronicus. In Jonathan Bate (ed.), Titus Andronicus. The Arden Shakespeare, Third Series. London & New York, NY: Routledge.
Sherry, Richard. 1550. A treatise on schemes and tropes. London: John Day. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/28447/28447-h/28447-h.htm (accessed on 10th July 2018).
Sidney, Philip. 2004 [1595]. The defence of poesy. In Gavin Alexander (ed.), Sidney’s ‘The Defence of Poesy’ and selected Renaissance literary criticism, 1–54. London: Penguin.
Barker, Francis, 1984. The tremulous private body. Essays on subjection. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Bevington, David. 1962. From Mankind to Marlowe. Growth of structure in the popular drama of Tudor England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bayley, John. 1981. Shakespeare and tragedy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Carlino, Andrea. 1999. Books of the body. Anatomical ritual and Renaissance learning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Clare, Robert. 1997. Quarto and folio: A case for conflation. In James Ogden & Arthur H. Scouten (eds.), Lear from study to stage: Essays in criticism, 79–108. Madison, WI: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
Colie, Rosalie L. 1974. Shakespeare’s living art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dessen, Alan C. 1984. Elizabethan stage conventions and modern interpreters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dessen, Alan C. 1995. Recovering Shakespeare’s theatrical vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511627460
Diehl, Huston. 1985. ‘To put us in remembrance’: The Protestant transformation of images of judgment. In David Bevington (ed.), Homo, Memento Finis: The iconography of just judgment in medieval art and drama, 179–208. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University.
Dollimore, Jonathan. 1984. Radical tragedy. Religion, ideology and power in the drama of Shakespeare and his contemporaries. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Döring, Tobias. 2006. Performances of mourning in Shakespearean theatre and early modern culture. Basingstoke & New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Elias, Norbert. 2000 [1939] The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. (Revised edition.) Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Elton, W. R. 1986. Shakespeare and the thought of his age. In Stanley Wells (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Shakespeare studies, 17–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fawcett, Mary Laughlin. 1983. Arms/words/tears: Language and the body in Titus Andronicus. English Literary History 50(2). 261–277. DOI: 10.2307/2872816
Garbero, Maria Del Sapio, Nancy Isenberg & Maddalena Pennacchia. 2010. Questioning bodies in Shakespeare’s Rome. Göttingen: V&R Unipress.
Goth, Maik. 2012. ‘Killing, hewing, stabbing, dagger-drawing, fighting, butchery’: Skin penetration in Renaissance tragedy and its bearing on dramatic theory. Comparative Drama 46(2). 139–162. DOI: 10.1353/cdr.2012.0016
Green, Douglas E. 1989. Interpreting ‘her martyr’d signs’: Gender and tragedy in Titus Andronicus. Shakespeare Quarterly 40(3). 317–326. DOI: 10.2307/2870726
Gumbrecht, Hans U. 2003. Production of presence: What meaning cannot convey. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hillman, David. 2007. Shakespeare’s entrails: Belief, scepticism and the interior of the body. Basingstoke & New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hillman, David & Carla Mazzio (eds.). 1997. The body in parts. Fantasies of corporeality in early modern Europe. New York, NY & London: Routledge.
Holmes, Jonathan & Adrian Streete. 2005. Introduction. In Jonathan Holmes & Adrian Streete (eds.), Refiguring mimesis: Representation in early modern literature, 1–15. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.
Kendall, Gillian Murray. 1989. ‘Lend me thy hand’: Metaphor and mayhem in Titus Andronicus. Shakespeare Quarterly 40(3). 299–316. DOI: 10.2307/2870725
Kiss, Attila. 1995. The semiotics of revenge. Subjectivity and abjection in English Renaissance tragedy. Szeged: Attila József University.
Knapp, Robert. 1989. Shakespeare - The theater and the book. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lin, Erika T. 2012. Shakespeare and the materiality of performance. Basingstoke & New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Luis-Martínez, Zenón. 2002. In words and deeds. The spectacle of incest in English Renaissance tragedy. Amsterdam & New York, NY: Rodopi.
Marshall, Cynthia. 2002. The shattering of the self. Violence, subjectivity, and early modern texts. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Maus, Katharine Eisaman. 1995. Inwardness and theater in the English Renaissance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Neill, Michael. 1997. Issues of death. Mortality and identity in English Renaissance tragedy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198183860.001.0001
Nunn, Hillary M. 2005. Staging anatomies: Dissection and spectacle in early Stuart tragedy. Farnham: Ashgate.
Owens, Margaret E. 2005. Stages of dismemberment. The fragmented body in late medieval and early modern drama. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press.
Pollard, Tanya. 2010. Enclosing the body: Tudor conceptions of skin. In Kent Cartwright (ed.), A companion to Tudor literature, 111–122. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781444317213.ch7
Sawday, Jonathan. 1995. The body emblazoned. Dissection and the human body in Renaissance culture. London & New York, NY: Routledge.
Schoenfeldt, Michael C. 1999. Bodies and selves in early modern England. Physiology and inwardness in Spenser, Shakespeare, Herbert, and Milton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, Molly Easo. 1996. Spectacles of torment in Titus Andronicus. Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900. 36(2). 315–331. DOI: 10.2307/450951
Spinrad, Phoebe S. 1987. The summons of death on the medieval and Renaissance English stage. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Streete, Adrian. 2009. Protestantism and drama in early modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511642302
Sugg, Richard. 2007. Murder after death: Literature and anatomy in early modern England. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.
Tempera, Mariangela. 1999. Feasting with centaurs. Titus Andronicus from stage to text. Bologna: CLUEB.
Tricomi, Albert H. 1974. The aesthetics of mutilation in Titus Andronicus. Shakespeare Survey 27. 11–19. DOI: 10.1017/CCOL0521204682.002
Vickers, Brian. 1999. Introduction. In Brian Vickers (ed.), English Renaissance literary criticism, 1–57. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Waldron, Jennifer E. 2013. Reformations of the body: Idolatry, sacrifice, and early modern theater. Basingstoke & New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Weimann, Robert. 1996. Authority and representation in early modern discourse. Baltimore, MD & London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Wickham, Glynne. 1963. Early English stages. 1300 to 1600. Vol. 2: 1576 to 1660, Part One. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Zimmerman, Susan. 2005. The early modern corpse and Shakespeare’s theatre. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Žižek, Slavoj. 2000. The ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. London & New York, NY: Verso.