Contemporary Ukrainian literary studies and the Soviet heritage
Journal cover Studia Ukrainica Posnaniensia, volume 13, no. 2, year 2025
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

methodology
historical narratives
periphery
occupation
colonialism
Soviet heritage
Ukrainian literary studies

How to Cite

Demska-Budzuliak, L. (2025). Contemporary Ukrainian literary studies and the Soviet heritage. Studia Ukrainica Posnaniensia, 13(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.14746/sup.2025.13.2.8

Abstract

Current Ukrainian literary studies, within the framework of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, reveal two primary issues: the absence of a suitable academic language for contemporary research, and a lack of awareness of its own historical narrative as a colonized nation. A significant factor contributing to the present circumstances is society’s failure to acknowledge two critical aspects of Ukraine’s history in recent centuries: the experiences of occupation and colonialism. The experiences of occupation and colonization were frequently treated within the Russian imperial, and subsequently Soviet, discourse as a peripheral narrative. This led to the emergence among Ukrainians of a sense of inferiority and being of secondary importance, which in turn influenced the reflective character of scientific approaches within the realm of literary studies. Gaining awareness of one’s colonial history enables the overcoming of colonial trauma through the creation of a personal narrative that reflects authentic historical experiences. Consequently, it is important to develop a new and autonomous methodological framework for Ukrainian literary studies.

https://doi.org/10.14746/sup.2025.13.2.8
PDF (Українська)

References

Aheieva V., Za lashtunkamy imperii. Esei pro ukrainsko-rosiiski kulturni vidnosyny, Kyiv: Vikhola, 2021.

Culler J., Literary theory: A very short introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Eagleton T., Literary theory: An introduction, University of Minnesota Press, 1983.

Eagleton T., Literary theory: An introduction (second edition), University of Minnesota Press, 1996.

Fizer I., Zustrichi chy zitknennia ukrainskoi filolohii iz zakhidnymy metodolohichnymy stratehiiamy, „Slovo i chas”, 2006, no 4, s. 3–9.

Hrabovych H., Deiaki teoretychni problemy ukrainskoho literaturoznavstva, [v:] Hrabovych H., Do istorii ukrainskoi literatury. Doslidzhennia, esei, polemika, Kyiv: Krytyka, 2003, s. 17–24.

Hrabovych H., Do istorii ukrainskoi literatury. Doslidzhennia, esei, polemika, Kyiv: Krytyka, 2003.

Hundorova T., Metodolohichnyi tysk, „Krytyka”, 2002, no. 12 (62), s. 14–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25574498

Kun T., Struktura naukovykh revoliutsii, per. z anhl. O. Vasylieva, Kyiv: Port-Royal, 2001.

Riabchuk M., Bila shkira, chorna mova. Travmatychnyi dosvid kolonialnoho upokorennia, „Zbruč”, 2021, Bila shkira, chorna mova | Zbruch (zbruc.eu).

Shils E., Centre and periphery, [v:] In the logic of personal knowledge: Essays presented to Michael Polanyi, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961, s. 117–130.

Thomposon E., Trubadury imperii. Rosiiska literatura i kolonializm, per. z. anhl. M. Korchynska, Kyiv: Nash Format, 2023.