Słowa kluczowe
AI systems
nature of philosophy
computer-generated philosophy
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
This paper concerns synthetic philosophy, or philosophy created by a computer system. We discuss when a work created by a computer system can be called a work of philosophy and when it cannot. We question the kind of philosophy that synthetic philosophy could be, as well as what kind of philosophical vistas it could open to us. Furthermore, we also delve into who would be responsible for the ethical impact from computer-generated philosophical works. Finally, we speculate about the possible future of synthetic philosophy with ai technologies that have yet to be created.
Bibliografia
Acosta, R., Levin, A. (2012). Artificial Intelligence and Authorship Rights. Jolt Digest. https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/artificial-intelligence-and-authorship-rights (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Agnew, E., Zhu, L., Wiseman, S., Rudin C. (2022). Can a Computer Really Write Poetry? Harvard Data Science Review, 4(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.3c7b563e
Aleksander, I. (2020). Category of Machines that Become Conscious. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness, 7(1), 313.
Aleksander, I., Morton, H. (2007). Why Axiomatic Models of Being Conscious? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 15–27.
Arek, T. (2020). Why Artificial General Intelligence Is Important and When It Will Be Achieved? https://www.imd.org/blog/digital-transformation/artificial-general-intelligence-agi/ (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Assimov, I. (1950/2018). I, Robot. Glasgow: Harper Voyager.
Baggini, J. (2018). How the World Thinks? London: Granta Books.
Bello, C. (2024). The Future of Academia Is Likely To Be Transformed By AI Language Models Such As ChatGPT. Here Are Some Other Tools Worth Knowing About. https://www.euronews.com/next/2024/01/20/best-ai-tools-academic-research-chatgpt-consensus-chatpdf-elicit-research-rabbit-scite (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Benaich, N. (2023). State of AI Report 2023. https://www.stateof.ai (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Bender, E.M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? In: Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’21), March 3–10, (2021), Virtual Event, Canada. New York: NY ACM. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Bensiger, G. (2023). ChatGPT Launches Boom in AI-written E-Books on Amazon. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-launches-boom-ai-written-e-books-amazon-2023-02-21/ (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Bloomberg Law. (2023). Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers Explained. Bloomberg. https://pro.bloomberglaw.com/insights/technology/ai-in-legal-practice-explained/#whatAI (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Bostrom, N. (2016). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: OUP.
Brown, T.B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G.,Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D.M., Wu, J., Winter, C., Hesse, C., Chen, M., Sigler, E., Litwin, M., Gray, S., Chess, B., Clark, J., Berner, C., McCandlish, S., Radford, A., Sutskever, I., Amodei, D. (2020). Language Models are Few--Shot Learners. arXiv:2005.14165 (accessed on 2.12.2021).
Cali, C. (2022). Philosophical, Experimental and Synthetic Phenomenology: The Study of Perception for Biological, Artificial Agents and Environments. Foundations of Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-022-09869-7
Cassimatis, N.L., Bello P., Langley, P. (2008). Ability, Breadth, and Parsimony in Models of Computational Higher-Order Cognition. Cognitive Sciences, 32(8), 1304–1322. PMID: 21585455 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210802455175
CBS. (2023). Meta’s Chief AI Scientist Yann LeCun Talks About the Future of Artificial Intelligence. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ah6nR8YAYF4 (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Cetinic, E., She, J. (2021). Understanding and Creating Art with AI: Review and Outlook.
Chalmers, D. (2017). Artificial Consciousness – David Chalmers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlAIuv31YKs (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Chomsky, N. (2021). Chomsky on Terence McKenna, Sam Harris, GPT3, Cryptocurrencies, Kierkegaard, Neuralink, & Hofstadter. Video on line. March 24, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6MU5zQwtT4 (accessed on 2.01.2022).
Chrisley, R. (2009). Synthetic Phenomenology. International Journal of Machine Consciousness, 1(1), 53–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793843009000074
Chrisley, R., Parthemore, J. (2007). Synthetic Phenomenology: Exploiting Embodiment to Specify the Nonconceptual Content of Visual Experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 44–58.
Clarke, D. (2007). Descartes. A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Copeland, B.J. (2000). The Church-Turing Thesis. AlanTuring.net. https://www.alanturing.net/turing_archive/pages/reference%20articles/The%20Turing-Church%20Thesis.html (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Copeland, B.J. (2024). The Church-Turing thesis. In: E.N. Zalta, U. Nodelman (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2024 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/church-turing (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Craig, E. (2002). Philosophy. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192854216.001.0001
Deleuze, G., Guattari F. (1994). What is Philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.
Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Back Bay Books.
Dhariwal, P., Jun, H., Payne, C., Kim, J.W., Radford, A., Sutskever, I. (2020). Juke-box: A Generative Model for Music. arXiv:2005.00341v1 [eess.AS].
Dodic-Crnovic, G. (n.d.). Computing beyond Turing Machine Model. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267240175_COMPUTING_BEYOND_TURING_MACHINE_MODEL (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Dreyfus, H.L. (2016). Skillful Coping. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
East, B. (2023). AI Has No Place in the Pulpit. https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2023/september-web-only/ai-has-no-place-in-pulpit-chatgpt-llm-openai-preaching-past.html (accessed on 12.12.2024).
ExpovistaTV. (2024). Large Language Models: They Are Not the Future. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsvKLxmtFmY (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Fjelland, R. (2020). Why General Artificial Intelligence Will Not Be Realized. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 7(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0494-4
Floridi, L., Massimo C. (2020). GPT‑3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences. Minds and Machines, 30, 681–694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1
Gamez, D. (2008). Progress in Machine Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 3(17), 887–910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.04.005
Gasarch, W., Hayes N., Kaplitz E., Regli W. (2021). Alternative Paradigms of Computation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356293519_Alternative_Paradigms_of_Computation.
Germain, T. (2024). AI Took Their Jobs. Now They Get Paid To Make It Sound Human. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20240612-the-people-making-ai-sound-more-human (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Gettier, E. (1963). Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis, 23(6): 121–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/23.6.121
Goertzel, B. (2015). Artificial General Intelligence. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Artificial_General_Intelligence (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Grisez, G. (1963). Towards MetaPhilosophy. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association. http://www.twotlj.org/OW-Metaphilosophy.pdf (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Hadot, P. (2008). Philosophy as a Way of Life. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Hampel, M. (2018).What Philosophy is For? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Haugeland, J. (1985). Artificial Intelligence. The Very Idea. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Heaven, W.D. (2020). OpenAI’s New Language Generator GPT-3 Is Shockingly Good – and Completely Mindless. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/07/20/1005454/openai-machine-learning-language-generator-gpt-3-nlp/ (accessed on 2.12.2021).
Heidegger, M. (1959). What is Philosophy? Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group.
Heikkilä, M., Heaven, W.D. (2022). Heaven Yann LeCun Has a Bold New Vision for the Future of AI. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/06/24/1054817/yann-lecun-bold-new-vision-future-ai-deep-learning-meta/ (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Hilton, N. (2023). LLMs are Definitionally Plagiaristic. Medium. https://nickfthilton.medium.com/llms-are-definitionally-plagiaristic-fc8c00299ae3 (accessed on 12.12.2024).
IBM (2023). What is Generative AI?. https://research.ibm.com/blog/what-is-generative-AI (accessed on 12.12.2024).
IBMML (2024). What is Machine Learning? https://www.ibm.com/topics/machine-learning (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Jabrzyk, M. (2024). What Is an Embedded System and How Does It Affect Our Daily Life? https://conclusive.tech/blog/what-is-an-embedded-system-and-how-does-it-affect-our-daily-life/ (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Joll, N. (2017). Metaphilosophy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/con-meta/ (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Jones, J. (2023). How to Use ChatGPT to Summarize a Book, Article, or Research Paper. https://www.zdnet.com/article/how-to-use-chatgpt-to-summarize-a-book-article-or-research-paper/ (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Kekes, J. (1980). The Nature of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kenny, A. ( 2012). A New History of Western Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kołakowski, L. (2005). Main Currents of Marxism. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Krzanowski R., Polak, P. (2021). The Future of AI: Stanisław Lem’s Philosophical Visions for AI and Cyber-Societies in Cyberiad. Pro-Fil – An Internet Journal of Philosophy, Special issue (Stanisław Lem). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/pf21-3-2405
Krzanowski, R., Polak, P. (2022). Is GPT-3 Language Model a Step Towards Artificial General Intelligence? Conference: IACAP-2022, International Association for Computing and Philosophy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362249832_IS_GPT-3_LANGUAGE_MODEL_A_STEP_TOWARDS_ARTIFICIAL_GENERAL_INTELLIGENCE_AGI_SOME_EXPERIMENTS_AND_THOUGHTS_ON_SYNTHETIC_PHILOSOPHY (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Krzanowski, R., Polak, P. (2023). Philosophy in the Age of AI Is Synthetic Philosophy Feasible? XII Polski Zjazd Filozoficzny, 11–16 września 2023.
Kumpulainen, S., Terziyan, V. (2022). Artificial General Intelligence vs. Industry 4.0: Do They Need Each Other? Procedia Computer Science, 200, 140–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.213
Kurzweil, R. (1990). The Age of Intelligent Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking Press.
Landymore, F. (2023). CNET Is Quietly Publishing Entire Articles Generated By AI. The Byte. https://futurism.com/the-byte/cnet-publishing-articles-by-ai (accessed on 12.12.2024).
LeCun, Y. (2024). Meta’s Chief AI Scientist Yann LeCun Talks About the Future of Artificial Intelligence. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ah6nR8YAYF4 (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Lem, S. (2013). Summa Technologiae. Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press.
Lennox, J. (2011). God and Stephen Hawking. Oxford: Lion.
Lin, R. (2023). The Medium. How to Use ChatGPT to Accelerate Literature Review. https://reneelin2019.medium.com/how-to-use-chatgpt-to-accelerate-literature-review-d14bfc47968b (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Lindgren, S. (2024). Critical Theory of AI. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ludwig, M. (2023). From Machine Learning to Autonomous Intelligence – AI-Talk by Prof. Dr. Yann LeCun. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pd0JmT6rYcI (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Marcus, E., Davis, E. (2020). GPT-3, Bloviator: OpenAI’s Language Generator Has No Idea What It’s Talking About. The MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/08/22/1007539/gpt3-openai-language-generator-artificial-intelligence-ai-opinion/ (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Marcus, G. (2022). Artificial General Intelligence Is Not As Imminent As You Might Think. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/artificial-general-intelligence-is-not-as-imminent-as-you-might-think1/ (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Maritain, J. (2005). An Introduction to Philosophy. New York: A Shed & Ward Book.
Mayr, E. (2011). Understanding Human Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606214.001.0001
McCarthy, J., Minsky, M., Rochester, N., Shannon, C. (1955). A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. http://jmc.stanford.edu/articles/dartmouth/dartmouth.pdf (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Metzinger, T. (2021). Artificial Suffering: An Argument for a Global Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology. (Philosophisches Seminar, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany). Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness, 1(8), 43–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S270507852150003X
Meyer, J.G., Urbanowicz, R.J., Martin, P.C.N., O’Connor, K., Li, R., Peng, P.C., Bright T.J., Tatonetti, N., Won, K.J., Gonzalez-Hernandez, G., Moore, J.H. (2023). ChatGPT and large Language Models In Academia: Opportunities and Challenges. BioData Mining. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-023-00339-9
Midgley, M. (2018). What is Philosophy for? London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
MissionMarketingTeam, (2024). The Ultimate Guide to Using AI to Create Sermons And Maximize Their Reach. AI for Churches. https://ai-for-churches.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-using-ai-to-create-sermons-and-maximize-their-reach/ (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Mitchell, M. (2019). Artificial Intelligence. A Guide for Thinking Humans. London: Penguin.
Mitchell, M. (2023). The Future of Artificial Intelligence. https://www.youtube.com/live/GwHDAfAAKd4 (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Nadler, S. (2013). The Philosopher, the Priest, and the Painter. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400847594
Nagel, T. (1987). What Does it All Mean? New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.
New York Times. (1904). Berlin’s Wonderful Horse; He Can Do Almost Everything but Talk – How He Was Taught. The New York Times. 1904-09-04. Retrieved 2008-02-26. https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1904/09/04/101396572.pdf (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Oreskes, N., Convey, E. (2011). Merchants of Doubt. London: Bloomsbury.
Overgaard, S., Gilbert, P., Burwood, S. (2013). An Introduction to Metaphilosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139018043
Paaß, G., Giesselbach, S. (2023). Pre-trained Language Models. In: Foundation Models for Natural Language Processing. Artificial Intelligence: Foundations, Theory, and Algorithms (pp. 19–78). Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23190-2_2
Piccinini, G. (2024). Neural Hardware for the Language of Thought. In: Philosophy of Neuromorphic AI. Workshop. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTo5BwuBsg0 (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Primiero, G. (2020). On the Foundations of Computing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198835646.001.0001
Pritchard, D. (2016). What Is This Thing Called Philosophy? New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771006
Quach, K. (2023). AI Cannot Be Credited as Authors in Papers. Top Academic Journals Rule. MSM. https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/27/top_academic_publisher_science_bans/ (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Rennie, J. (2010). Ray Kurzweil’s Slippery Futurism. IEEE Spectrum. https://theoreti.ca/?p=3407 (accessed on 12.12.2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2010.5644774
Rescher, N. (2023). Philosophy Examined. Berlin: DeGryuer.
Russell, B. (2001/1912). The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Russell, B. (2005/1946). History of Western Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Russell, S. (2020). Human Compatible. London: Penguin Books.
Schlagwein, D., Willcocks, L. (2023). ‘ChatGPT et al.: The ethics of using (generative) artificial intelligence in research and science. Journal of Information Technology, 38(3), 232–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962231200411
Sellars, W. (1963). Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man in Science, Perception and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Sipser, M. (2020). TM Variants, Church-Turing Thesis. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTArY7ojshU (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Skowron, B., Stacewicz P. (2023). Between Fiction, Reality, And Ideality: Virtual Objects As Computationally Grounded Intentional Objects. Philosophy and Technology, 36(2), 1–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00633-8
Smith, B. (2019). The Promise of Artificial Intelligence. London: The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12385.001.0001
Smith D.H., Schillaci, G. (2021). Why Build a Robot With Artificial Consciousness? How to Begin? A Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue on the Design and Implementation of a Synthetic Model of Consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 12:530560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.530560
Stacewicz, P. (2019). Uncomputable Numbers and the Limits of Coding in Computer Science. Studia Semiotyczne – English Supplement, 30, 107–126.
Tang, D. (2020). The Machines Are Coming, and They Write Really Bad Poetry. Literary Hub. https://lithub.com/the-machines-are-coming-and-they-write-really-bad-poetry/(accessed on 12.12.2024).
TED (n.d.) “Programs & initiatives”. Ted.com. https://web.archive.org/web/20230417101131/http://www.ted.com/about/programs-initiatives (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Thagard, P. (2024). Philosophy of Neuromorphic AI – Paul Thagard: Consciousness and Neuromorphic AI. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6qITeZgTaY (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Vincent, J. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Authorship Rights. Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/26/23570967/chatgpt-author-scientific-papers-springer-nature-ban (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Ward, A.F. (2021). People Mistake the Internet’s Knowledge for Their Own. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 118(43):e2105061118.PMID: 34686595; PMCID: PMC8612631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105061118
Wegner, P., Goldin, D. (2003). Computation Beyond Turing Machines. Communications of the ACM, 46, 100–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/641205.641235
Weinberg, J. (2020). Philosophers On GPT 3 (updated with replies by GPT 3). Blog Dailynous.com. https://dailynous.com/2020/07/30/philosophers-gpt-3/#chalmers (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Williamson, T. (2022). The Philosophy of Philosophy. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Ltd.
Wilson, D. (2017). Superstition and Science. London: Robinson.
Wolfram, S. (2023a.) What is ChatGPT Doing… And Why Does It Work? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flXrLGPY3SU (accessed on 12.12.2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31855/bc47ee6b-75c
Wolfram, S. (2023b). All-In Summit: Stephen Wolfram on Computation, AI, and the Nature of the Universe. The All-In Summit 2023 at Royce Hall on UCLA’s campus in Los Angeles. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cQmQIYNI5M (accessed on 12.12.2024).
Yancy, G. (2002). The Philosophical I. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2024 Roman Krzanowski
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
1. W momencie złożenia pracy celem rozpoczęcia postępowania w sprawie publikacji, Licencjodawca, zwany dalej Autorem, akceptuje wszystkie zasady umieszczone na stronie internetowej czasopisma “Człowiek i Społeczeństwo”, udzielając Licencjobiorcy, zwanego dalej Wydawcą, niewyłącznej i nieodpłatnej licencji na korzystanie z Utworu. Licencja zakłada tym samym brak ograniczeń terytorialnych, czasowych oraz ilościowych na następujących polach eksploatacji (art. 50 ustawy z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych):
a. utrwalanie Utworu;
b. zwielokrotnienie Utworu drukiem i w wersji cyfrowej;
c. wprowadzenie do obrotu, użyczenie lub najem oryginału/zwielokrotnionych egzemplarzy Utworu;
d. publiczne wykonanie, wystawienie, wyświetlenie, odtworzenie oraz nadawanie i reemitowanie, a także publiczne udostępnianie Utworu w taki sposób, aby każdy mógł mieć do niego dostęp w miejscu i w czasie przez siebie wybranym;
e. włączenie Utworu w skład utworu zbiorowego;
f. wprowadzenie Utworu w postaci elektronicznej na platformy elektroniczne lub inne wprowadzenie Utworu w postaci elektronicznej do Internetu, Intranetu, Extranetu lub innej sieci;
g. rozpowszechnianie Utworu w wersji elektronicznej w Internecie, Intranecie, Extranecie lub innej sieci, w pracy zbiorowej, a także samodzielnie w formule Open Access w oparciu o licencję Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa Licencja Publiczna (CC BY 4.0), a także inną wersję językową tej licencji, lub którąkolwiek późniejszą wersję tej licencji.
2. Założenia licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa Licencja Publiczna (CC BY 4.0), udzielają Wydawcy upoważnienia do kopiowania, zmieniania, rozprowadzania, przedstawiania i wykonywania Utworu jedynie pod warunkiem uznania autorstwa.
3. Wraz z dostarczeniem Utworu, Autor zobowiązuje się do wypełnienia, podpisania oraz odesłania skanu umowy