Abstrakt
Purpose: This study addresses the experiences of entrepreneurial women within the family interface, examining how gender roles influence their professional identity as self-expansion. It aims to deepen understanding of their marital challenges and propose insights to advance their professional and marital success. Design/methodology/approach: The study is based on in-depth interviews with 38 middle-class women entrepreneurs (aged 35–36) managing business in Israel for over four years. data analysis follows a constructivist-qualitative approach. Findings: three key themes emerged: (1) negotiations on norms and role identity – conflict
between family roles and self-expansion creates personal and marital tension, sometimes leading to divorce; (2) reduction or elimination of roles – some women forgo marriage or parenthood to achieve self-expansion; (3) reversal or change of roles – an egalitarian or reversed division of roles fosters self-expansion and family enrichment. Research limitations: This qualitative study relies on life stories, providing insights but challenging the process of recruitment and objectivity. Implications: It is recommended to develop educational programs for the empowerment of the self-expansion and marital support for the change of traditional roles alongside the extension of the cultural discussion on self-expansion.
Bibliografia
Agarwal, S., Lenka, U. (2015). Study on work-life balance of women entrepreneurs – review and research agenda. Industrial and Commercial Training, 47(7), 356–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-01-2015-0006
Agrillo, C., Nelini, C. (2008). Childfree by choice: A review. Journal of Cultural Geography, 25(3), 347–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08873630802476292
Aldrich, H.E., Cliff, J.E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 573–596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9
Anglin, A.H., Kincaid, P.A., Short, J.C., Allen, D.G. (2022). Role theory perspectives: past, present, and future applications of role theories in management research. Journal of Management, 48(6), 1469–1502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221081442
Aron, A., Aron, E.N. (1996). Self and self-expansion in relationships. In: G.J.O. Fletcher, J. Fitness (Eds.), Knowledge Structures in Close Relationships: A Social Psychological Approach (pp. 325–344). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Aron, A., Aron, E.N., Norman, C. (2003). Self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships and beyond. In: G.J.O. Fletcher, M. Sydnor Clark, Blackwell DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470998557.ch19
Handbook of Social Psychology: Interpersonal Processes (pp. 478–501). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Aron, A., Lewandowski, G.W., Branand, B., Mashek, D., Aron, E.N. (2022). Self-expansion motivation and inclusion of others in self: An updated review. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(12), 3821–3852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221110630
Aron, A., Lewandowski, G.W., Mashek, D., Aron, E.N. (2013). The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships. In: J.A. Simpson, L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Close Relationships. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398694.013.0005
Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., Mashek, D., Lewandowski, G., Wright, S.C., Aron, E.N. (2004). Including others in the self. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 101–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280440000008
Baker, J.P., Berenbaum, H. (2007). Emotional approach and problem-focused coping: A comparison of potentially adaptive strategies. Cognition and Emotion, 21(1), 95–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930600562276
Baltes, B.B., Heydens-Gahir, H.A. (2003). Reduction of work-family conflict through the use of selection, optimization, and compensation behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 1005–1018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1005
Barnett, R.C., Hyde, J.S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family: an expansionist theory. The American Psychologist, 56(10), 781–796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.10.781
Baron, R.A. (2004). The cognitive perspective: a valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship’s basic “why” questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 221–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00008-9
Bender, K.A., Donohue, S.M., Heywood, J.S. (2005). Job satisfaction and gender segregation. Oxford Economic Papers, 57(3), 479–496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpi015
Biddle, B.J. (1979). Role Theory: Expectations, Identities, and Behaviors. Cambridge: Elsevier Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-095950-1.50008-1
Bishop, E.C., Shepherd, M.L. (2011). Ethical reflections: Examining reflexivity through the narrative paradigm. Qualitative Health Research, 21(9), 1283–1294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311405800
Blood, R.O., Jr., Wolfe, D.M. (1960). Husbands and Wives: The Dynamics of Family Living. Glencoe: Free Press.
Bruner, J. (1992). The Autobiographical Process. In R. Folkenflik (Ed.), The Culture of Autobiography (pp. 38–56). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503622043-006
Callan, V.J. (1986). The impact of the first birth: Married and single women preferring childlessness, one child, or two children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48(2), 261–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/352393
Carlson, D.S., Kacmar, K.M., Wayne, J.H., Grzywacz, J.G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work–family interface: Development and validation of a work–family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(1), 131–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.02.002
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2008). Constructionism and the grounded theory method. In J.A. Holstein (Ed.), Handbook of Constructionist Research (pp. 397–412). New York: Guilford Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607927.n14
Charmaz, K. (2015). Grounded theory: methodology and theory construction. In P.B. Baltes, N.J. Smelser (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 402–407). Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.44029-8
Charmaz, K., Belgrave, L. (2012). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J.F. Gubrium, J.A. Holstein, A.B. Marvasti (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft (pp. 347–366). London: SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218403.n25
Charmaz, K., Henwood, K. (2017). Grounded theory methods for qualitative psychology. In C. Willig, W.S. Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (pp. 238–256). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n14
Chasserio, S., Pailot, P., Poroli, C. (2014). When entrepreneurial identity meets multiple social identities: Interplays and identity work of women entrepreneurs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 20(2), 128–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2011-0157
Christiansen, S.L., Palkovitz, R. (2001). Why the “Good Provider” role still matters: providing as a form of paternal involvement. Journal of Family Issues, 22(1), 84–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019251301022001004
Corradi, C. (1991). Text, context and individual meaning: Rethinking life stories in a hermeneutic framework. Discourse and Society, 2(1), 105–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926591002001006
Crosby, F.J. (1991). Juggling: The Unexpected Advantages of Balancing Career and Home for Women and Their Families. New York: Free Press.
Deci, E.L., Ryan R.M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
Eagly, A.H., Karau, S.J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 685–710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.60.5.685
Edwards, J.R., Rothbard, N.P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 178–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/259269
Freeman, M., Given, L. (2008). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Friedman, S.D., Greenhaus, J.H. (2000). Work and Family--Allies or Enemies? What Happens When Business Professionals Confront Life Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195112757.001.0001
Frone, M.R., Russell, M., Cooper, M.L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(1), 65–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.77.1.65
Gareis, K.C., Barnett, R.C., Ertel, K.A., Berkman, L.F. (2009). Work-family enrichment and conflict: Additive effects, buffering, or balance?, Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 696–707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00627.x
Geertz, C. (1990). Interpretation of Cultures. Jerusalem: Keter Press.
Gergen, M. (2017). Qualitative methods in feminist psychology. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (pp. 289–304). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n17
Gherardi, S. (2015). Authoring the female entrepreneur while talking the discourse of work–family life balance. International Small Business Journal, 33(6), 649–666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614549780
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2023). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2023/2024 Global Report. https://www.parp.gov.pl/component/content/article/85867:global-entrepreneurship-monitor-2023-2024-globalny-raport-juz-dostepny
Graham, J.M., Harf, M.R. (2015). Self-expansion and flow: The roles of challenge, skill, affect, and activation. Personal Relationships, 22(1), 45–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12062
Gray, L.M., Wong-Wylie, G., Rempel, G.R., Cook, K. (2020). Expanding qualitative research interviewing strategies: Zoom video communications. The Qualitative Report, 25(5), 1292–1301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4212
Greenhaus, J.H., Beutell, N.J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Journal, 10(1), 76–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258214
Greenhaus, J.H., Parasuraman, S. (1999). Research on work, family, and gender: Current status and future directions. In G.N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of Gender and Work (pp. 391–412). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231365.n20
Greenhaus, J.H., Powell, G.N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work–family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379625
Greenhaus, J.H., Collins, K.M., Shaw, J.D. (2003). The Relation between work–family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 510–531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00042-8
Gronau, R. (1977). Leisure, home production, and work – the theory of the allocation of time revisited. Journal of Political Economy, 85(6), 1099–1123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260629
Guba, E.G., Lincoln, Y.S. (1983). Effective Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Chicago: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1bzfp1z
Harding, S. (2007). Feminist standpoints. In S.N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis (pp. 45–69), Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publishers.
Hason, Y., Ben-Eliyahu, H., Zameret, H. (2021). Behind the Numbers: The Implications of the Coronavirus Pandemic on Women and Men in Israel. You Know: Center of Knowledge on the Topic of Women and Gender in Israel. Tel Aviv: Van Lear Institute.
Hirschi, A., Allmen, N. von, Burmeister, A., Zacher, H. (2022). Action regulation at the work–family interface: Nomological network and work–family consequences. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(2), 369–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09751-6
Holstein, J.A., Gubrium, J.F. (2008). Handbook of Constructionist Research. New York: Guilford Press.
Hsu, D.K., Wiklund, J., Anderson, S.E., Coffey, B.S. (2016). Entrepreneurial exit intentions and the business-family interface. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(6), 613–627. 1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.08.001
Hughes, E.K., Slotter, E.B., Lewandowski Jr, G.W. (2019). Expanding who i am: validating the self-expansion preference scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(6), 792–803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1641109
Jennings, J.E., McDougald, M.S. (2007). Work-family interface experiences and coping strategies: Implications for entrepreneurship research and practice. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 747–760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275510
Joel, S., MacDonald, G., Page-Gould, E. (2017). Wanting to stay and wanting to go: Unpacking the content and structure of relationship stay/leave decision processes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(6), 631–644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617722834
Josselson, R., Liblich, A., Steinman, Y. (2015). How to Interview for Qualitative Research: A Relational Approach. Tel Aviv: Mofet Institute.
Kernis, M.H., Paradise, A.W., Whitaker, D.J., Wheatman, S.R., Goldman, B.N. (2000). Master of one’s psychological domain? Not likely if one’s self-esteem is unstable. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1297–1305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262010
Krumer-Nevo, M., Lavie-Ajayi, M., Hacker, D. (2014). Feminist Research Methodologies. Tel Aviv: HaKibbutz HaMeuchad.
Lapierre, L.M., Li, Y., Kwan, H.K., Greenhaus, J.H., DiRenzo, M.S., Shao, P. (2018). A meta-analysis of the antecedents of work–family enrichment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(4), 385–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2234
Laron, M., Goldweg, R. (2020). Health Behaviors during the Outbreak of the Coronavirus Pandemic – Initial Findings. Special Publication. Tel-Aviv: Joint-Brookdale Institute.
LaRossa, R., Bennett, L., Gelles, R. (1981). Ethical dilemmas in qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43(2), 303–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/351382
Laufer, S., Hern-Rosen, M., Somech, S. (2020). Employment, Income, and Economic Situation of the Households in Israel during the Coronavirus. Tel-Aviv: Meyers-Joint-Brookdale Institute.
Lawler, S. (2008). Identity, Sociological Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lazarus, R.S., Folkman, S. (1984). Coping and adaptation. In W.D. Gentry (Ed.), Handbook of Behavioral Medicine (pp. 282–325). New York: Guilford Press.
Lent, R.W., Singley, D., Sheu, H.B., Gainor, K.A., Brenner, B.R., Treistman, D., Ades, L. (2005). Social cognitive predictors of domain and life satisfaction: Exploring the theoretical precursors of subjective well-being. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(3), 429–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.429
Letherby, G. (2003). Feminist Research in Theory and Practice. Buckingham: McGraw-Hill Education.
Lewandowski, G.W., Ackerman, R.A. (2006). Something’s missing: Need fulfillment and self-expansion as predictors of susceptibility to infidelity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(4), 389–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.146.4.389-403
Lewis, P. (2013). The search for an authentic entrepreneurial identity: difference and professionalism among women business owners. Gender, Work and Organization, 20(3), 252–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00568.x
March, J.G. (1994). A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New York: Free Press.
Mattingly, B.A., Lewandowski, G.W. (2013). An expanded self is a more capable self: The association between self-concept size and self-efficacy. Self and Identity, 12(6), 621–634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2012.718863
Mattingly, B.A., Lewandowski, G.W. (2014). Expanding the self brick by brick: Nonrelational self-expansion and self-concept size. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(4), 484–490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613503886
Mattingly, B.A., McIntyre, K., Lewandowski, G. (2012). Approach motivation and the expansion of self in close relationships. Personal Relationships, 19(1), 113–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01343.x
Mattingly, B.A., McIntyre, K.P., Knee, C.R., Loving, T.J. (2018). Implicit theories of relationships and self-expansion: implications for relationship functioning. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(6), 1579–1599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518768079
Maynes, M.J., Pierce, J.L., Laslett, B. (2008). Intersecting stories: personal narratives in historical context. In M.J. Maynes, J.L. Pierce, B. Laslett, Telling Stories: The Use of Personal Narratives in the Social Sciences and History (pp. 43–69). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
McIntyre, K.P., Mattingly, B.A., Lewandowski, G.W., Simpson, A. (2014). Workplace self-expansion: Implications for job satisfaction, commitment, self-concept clarity, and self-esteem among the employed and unemployed”. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36(1), 59–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.856788
Meler, T. (2020). Money, power, and inequality within marriage among Palestinian families in Israel. The Sociological Review (Keele), 68(3), 623–640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119881093
Mikulincer, M., Goodman, G.S. (Eds.). (2006). Dynamics of Romantic Love: Attachment, Caregiving, and Sex. New York: Guilford Publications.
Mills, J., Bonner, A., Francis, K. (2006). The development of constructivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 25–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500103
Minnotte, K.L. (2016). Gender, work-family conflicts, and perceived parental success: The moderating role of gender ideology. Sociological Focus, 49(3), 180–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2016.1135028
Nikina, A., Shelton, L.M., LeLoarne, S. (2015). An examination of how husbands, as key stakeholders, impact the success of women entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 22(1), 38–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2012-0002
Oakes, G. (1977). The verstehen thesis and the foundations of Max Weber’s methodology. history and theory. Studies in the Philosophy of History, 16(1), 11–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2504575
Oliffe, J.L., Kelly, M.T., Montaner, G.G., Yu Ko, W.F. (2021). Zoom Interviews: Benefits and Concessions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211053522
Overall, N.C., Fletcher, G.J.O., Simpson, J.A. (2010). Helping each other grow: Romantic partner support, self-improvement, and relationship quality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1496–1513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210383045
Parsons, J.M., Chappell, A. (2020). A case for auto/biography. In J.M. Parsons, A. Chappell (Eds.), Palgrave Handbook of Auto/Biography, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31974-8
Poggesi, S., Mari, M., De Vita, L. (2019). Women entrepreneurs and work-family conflict: An analysis of the antecedents. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(2), 431–454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0484-1
Powell, G.N., Eddleston, K.A. (2013). Linking family-to-business enrichment and support to entrepreneurial success: do female and male entrepreneurs experience different outcomes?. Journal of Business Ventures, 28(2), 261–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.02.007
Powell, G.N., Greenhaus, J.H. (2010). Sex, gender, and decisions at the family → work interface. Journal of Management, 36(4), 1011–1039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350774
Reinharz, S., Davidman, L. (1992). Feminist Methods in Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rogoff, E.G., Heck, R.K.Z. (2003). Evolving research in entrepreneurship and family business: Recognizing family as the oxygen that feeds the fire of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 559–566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00009-0
Rosenbaum, M., Cohen, E. (1999). Equalitarian marriages, spousal support, resourcefulness, and psychological distress among Israeli working women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54(1), 102–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1998.1644
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68
Sager, C.J., Kaplan, H.S., Gundlach, R.H., Kremer, M., Lenz, R., Royce, J.R. (1971). The marriage contract. Family Process, 10(3), 311–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1971.00311.x
Seale, C. (2012). Using software to analyze qualitative interviews. In J.F. Gubrium, J.A. Holstein, A.B. Marvasti (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft (pp. 427–440). New York: SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218403.n30
Shelton, L.M. (2006). Female entrepreneurs, work–family conflict, and venture performance: new insights into the work–family interface. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 285–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00168.x
Shepherd, D., Haynie, J.M. (2009). Family business, identity conflict, and an expedited entrepreneurial process: A process of resolving identity conflict. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6), 1245–1264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00344.x
Shkedi, A. (2003). Words that Try to Touch: Qualitative Research – Theory and Implementation, Ramot: Tel-Aviv University.
Shkedi, A. (2014). The Meaning after the Words: Methodologies in Qualitative Research, Theory in Practice (2nd Ed.), Ramot: Tel-Aviv University.
Shlasky, S., Alpert, B. (2007). Ways in the Writing of Qualitative Research: From the Decomposition of Reality to Its Construction as Text. Tel-Aviv: Mofet Institute: The School of Research and Development of Programs in the Training of Teaching and Education Workers in the Colleges.
Sirgy, M.J., Lee, D.J., Park, S., Joshanloo, M., Kim, M. (2020). Work–family spillover and subjective well-being: the moderating role of coping strategies. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(8), 2909–2929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00205-8
Sok, J. (2016). Make It Work: Rethinking the Work-Home Interface. Ph.D. Dissertation, Breukelen, The Netherlands: Nyenrode Business University.
Ten Brummelhuis, L.L., Bakker, A.B. (2012). A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work–home resources model. American Psychologist, 67(7), 545–556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027974
Tobin, D., Lavie-Ajayi, M. (2021). Conversations on Qualitative Researcher. Negew: Ben-Gurion University.
Tolich, M. (2010). A Critique of current practice: ten foundational guidelines for auto ethnographers. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1599–1610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310376076
Voydanoff, P. (2002). Linkages between the work-family interface and work, family, and individual outcomes: an integrative model. Journal of Family Issues, 3(1), 138–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X02023001007
Voydanoff, P. (2005). Work demands and work-to-family and family-to-work conflict: direct and indirect relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 26(6) 77–726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X05277516
Wayne, J.H., Grzywacz, J.G., Carlson, D.S., Kacmar, K. (2007). Work-family facilitation: A theoretical explanation and model of primary antecedents and consequences. Human Resource Management Review, 17(1), 63–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.01.002
Witt, L.A., Carlson, D.S. (2006). The work-family interface and job performance: Moderating effects of conscientiousness and perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 343–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.4.343
Wu, C., Hunter, E.M., Sublett, L.W. (2021). Gaining affective resources for work-family enrichment: A multisource experience sampling study of micro-role transitions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 125, 103541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103541
Znaniecki, F. (1927). The object matter of sociology. The American Journal of Sociology, 32(4), 529–584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/214184
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Michel Fickler
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
1. W momencie złożenia pracy celem rozpoczęcia postępowania w sprawie publikacji, Licencjodawca, zwany dalej Autorem, akceptuje wszystkie zasady umieszczone na stronie internetowej czasopisma “Człowiek i Społeczeństwo”, udzielając Licencjobiorcy, zwanego dalej Wydawcą, niewyłącznej i nieodpłatnej licencji na korzystanie z Utworu. Licencja zakłada tym samym brak ograniczeń terytorialnych, czasowych oraz ilościowych na następujących polach eksploatacji (art. 50 ustawy z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych):
a. utrwalanie Utworu;
b. zwielokrotnienie Utworu drukiem i w wersji cyfrowej;
c. wprowadzenie do obrotu, użyczenie lub najem oryginału/zwielokrotnionych egzemplarzy Utworu;
d. publiczne wykonanie, wystawienie, wyświetlenie, odtworzenie oraz nadawanie i reemitowanie, a także publiczne udostępnianie Utworu w taki sposób, aby każdy mógł mieć do niego dostęp w miejscu i w czasie przez siebie wybranym;
e. włączenie Utworu w skład utworu zbiorowego;
f. wprowadzenie Utworu w postaci elektronicznej na platformy elektroniczne lub inne wprowadzenie Utworu w postaci elektronicznej do Internetu, Intranetu, Extranetu lub innej sieci;
g. rozpowszechnianie Utworu w wersji elektronicznej w Internecie, Intranecie, Extranecie lub innej sieci, w pracy zbiorowej, a także samodzielnie w formule Open Access w oparciu o licencję Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa Licencja Publiczna (CC BY 4.0), a także inną wersję językową tej licencji, lub którąkolwiek późniejszą wersję tej licencji.
2. Założenia licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa Licencja Publiczna (CC BY 4.0), udzielają Wydawcy upoważnienia do kopiowania, zmieniania, rozprowadzania, przedstawiania i wykonywania Utworu jedynie pod warunkiem uznania autorstwa.
3. Wraz z dostarczeniem Utworu, Autor zobowiązuje się do wypełnienia, podpisania oraz odesłania skanu umowy