Abstrakt
Celem artykułu jest analiza polityki handlowej Unii Europejskiej wobec Chin w kontekście zmian jakie są związane z wygaśnięciem okresu przejściowego członkostwa Chin w WTO, które nastąpiło w grudniu 2016 roku. Wygaśnięcie owego okresu przejściowego wymusza na Unii Europejskiej pewne zamiany zwłaszcza w postępowaniach antydumpingowych. Dla zrealizowania celu pracy przyjęto że przyznanie lub nie statusu gospodarki rynkowej Chinom jest przede wszystkim decyzją polityczną wymagającą uwzględniani sprzecznych interesów państw członkowskich UE.Bibliografia
Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994), https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/19-adp_01_e.htm.
Agrement on implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (1999), in: The Legal Texts. The results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, WTO, Cambridge University Press.
Council Regulation No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, Official Journal of the European Union L 343/51.
Council Regulation No 905/98 of the Council of 27th April 1998 leading to the modification of regulation (CE) no. 384/96, http://eur-ex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31998R0905&from=EN.
Gajdos L. Bendini R. (2013), Trade and economic relations with China, Policy Briefing, DG EXPO/B/PolDep/Note/2013_123.
Gertler J. L. (2004), What China’s WTO accession is all about, in: China and the WTO, Accession, Policy reform, and poverty reduction strategies, eds. D. Bhattasali, S. Li, W. Martin, World Bank and Oxford, University Press.
Guijn L., Bi T. (2015), China’s role In the WTO: Opening up as a way to push forward reforms and combat trade protectionism in China’s WTO Accession Reassessed, Luolin W. (Editor), Routledge Studies on the Chinese Economy.
Jakubowski J., Kaczmarski M. (2016), UE wobec statusu gospodarki wolnorynkowej dla Chin: kompromis czy unik?, Komentarze OSW no. 221.
Kercrhoven van S., Luyten A. (2014), The tale of a Trojan horse or the quest for market access? China and the World Trade Organization, Rev. Bras. Polít. int. 57 (special edition).
Luo Y. (2010), Anti-dumping in the WTO, the EU and China. The Rise of Legalization in the Trade Regime and its Consequences, Kluwer Law International.
Miranda J. (2014), Interpreting Paragraph 15 of China’s Protocol of Accession, Global Trade and Customs Journal 19.
Messerlin P. A. (2004), China in the WTO: Antidumping and safeguards, in: China and the WTO, Accession, Policy reform, and poverty reduction strategies, eds. D. Bhattasali, S. Li, W. Martin, World Bank and Oxford, University Press.
O’Connor B. (2016), Much Ado about ‘Nothing’: 2016, China and Market Economy Status, “Global Trade and Customs Journal”, vol. 10, no. 5.
O’Connor B. (2011), Market Economy Status for China is not Automatic, CEPR’s Policy Portal, http://voxeu.org/article/china-market-economy, 10.03.2016.
Puccio L. (2015), Granting of Market Economy Status to China. An analysis of WTO law and of selected WTO members’ policy, European Parliamentary Research Service, November 2015/PE571.325.
Scott R., Jiang X. (2015), Unilateral grant of Market Economy Status to China would put millions of EU jobs at risk, Economic Policy Institute, EPI Briefing Paper 407.
Snyder F. (2010), The EU, the WTO and China. Legal Pluralism and International Regulation, Hart, Oxford–Portland.
Tietje Ch., Nowrot K. (2011), Myth or reality? China’s Market Economy Status under WTO Anti-Dumping Law after 2016, Policy Papers o Transnational Economic Law, no. 34.
Towards a robust trade policy for the EU in the interest of jobs and growth, Brussels, 18.10.2016 COM(2016) 690 final, https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2016/EN/1-2016-690-EN-F1-1.PDF.
Vermulst E., Dion Sud J., Evenett S. J. (2016), Normal value in anti-dumping proceedings against China post-2016: Are some animals less equal than others?, “Global Trade and Customs Journal”, vol. 11, no. 5.
Vincentini D. (2016), MEPs braced for fight over granting China ‘Market Economy’ status, http://www.euractiv.com/section/trade-society/news/meps-braced-for-fight-over-granting-chinamarket-economy-status/.
Wnukowski D. (2016), Kwestia przyznania ChRL statusu gospodarki rynkowej – implikacje dla UE i Polski, „Biuletyn PISM”, nr 54.
WTO data, Statistics on anti-dumping, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_e.htm.