Wokół roku 1948: „rewolucja łagodna” i historia sztuki

Main Article Content

Anna Markowska

Abstrakt

Just like after World War I Italy experienced a transition from modernism to fascism, after World War II Poland experienced a passage from modernism to quasi-communism. The symbol of the first stage of the communist revolution in Poland right after the war, the so-called “gentle revolution,” was Pablo Picasso, whose work was popularized not so much because of its artistic value, but because of his membership in the communist party. The second, repressive stage of the continued came in 1949–1955, to return after the so-called thaw to Picasso and the exemplars of the École de Paris. However, the imagery of the revolution was associated only with the socialist realism connected to the USSR even though actually it was the adaptation of the École de Paris that best expressed the revolution’s victory. In the beginning, its moderate program, strongly emphasizing the national heritage as well as financial promises, made the cultural offer of the communist regime quite attractive not only for the left. Thus, the gentle revolution proved to be a Machiavellian move, disseminating power to centralize it later more effectively. On the other hand, the return to the Paris exemplars resulted in the aestheticization of radical and undemocratic changes. The received idea that the evil regime was visualized only by the ugly socialist realism is a disguise of the Polish dream of innocence and historical purity, while it was the war which gave way to the revolution, and right after the war artists not only played games with the regime, but gladly accepted social comfort guaranteed by authoritarianism. Neither artists, nor art historians started a discussion about the totalizing stain on modernity and the exclusion of the other. Even the folk art was instrumentalized by the state which manipulated folk artists to such an extent that they often lost their original skills. Horrified by the war atrocities and their consequences, art historians limited their activities to the most urgent local tasks, such as making inventories of artworks, reorganization of institutions, and reconstruction. Mass expropriation, a consequence of the revolution, was not perceived by museum personnel as a serious problem, since thanks to it museums acquired more and more exhibits, while architects and restorers could implement their boldest plans. The academic and social neutralization of expropriation favored the birth of a new human being, which was one of the goals of the revolution. Along the ethnic homogenization of society, focusing on Polish art meant getting used to monophony. No cultural opposition to the authoritarian ideas of modernity appeared – neither the École de Paris as a paradigm of the high art, nor the folklore manipulated by the state were able to come up with the ideas of the weak subject or counter-history. Despite the social revolution, the class distinction of ethnography and high art remained unchanged.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Dział
PRZEŁOMY: HISTORIE HISTORII SZTUKI W POLSCE I EUROPIE

Bibliografia

  1. I Wystawa Sztuki Nowoczesnej pięćdziesiąt lat później, red. M. Świca, J. Chrobak, Kraków 1998
  2. Adamson W.L., Modernism and Fascism: The Politics of Culture in Italy, 1903–1922, „The American Historical Review” 1990, 2(95), s. 359–390
  3. Adamson W.L., Avant-garde Florence. From Modernism to Fascism, Cambridge, MA, 1993
  4. Adorno T.W., E. Frenkel-Bruswick et al., The Authoritarian Personality, New York 1950
  5. Antliff M., P. Leighten, Primitivism, w: Critical Terms for Art History, red. R.S. Nelson, R. Schiff, Chicago 2003
  6. Arendt H., O rewolucji, przeł. M. Godyń, Warszawa 2003
  7. Art History and its Institutions. Foundations of a Discipline, red. E. Mansfield, London–New York 2002 The Artist Outsider: Creativity and the Boundaries of Culture, red. M.D. Hall, E.W. Metcalf, Jr., Washington 1994
  8. Bochnak A., Zarys dziejów polskiej historii sztuki, Kraków 1948
  9. Bochnak A., Malarstwo flamandzkie XVII wieku: Rubens – Jordaens – Van Dyck: wykłady uniwersyteckie z r. 1947/48, Kraków 1949
  10. Bogucki J., Miejsce opuszczone przez dzięcioły, czyli sztuka majaczenia i dyscypliny, „Odrodzenie” 1949, 5, przedruk: W kręgu lat czterdziestych, cz. III, red. J. Chrobak, Kraków 1991, s. 32
  11. Borejsza J., Rewolucja łagodna, „Odrodzenie” 1945, 10–12; przedruk: Czas debat. Antologia krytyki artystycznej z lat 1945–1954, opr. A. Pietrasik, P. Słodkowski, t. 1, Warszawa 2016, s. 21– 30
  12. Dobrowolski T., Zagadnienie muzealnictwa, „Biuletyn Historii Sztuki i Kultury” 1946, 3–4(8)
  13. Fine G.A., Self Taught Art and the Culture of Authenticity, Chicago 2004
  14. Foucault M., Trzeba bronić społeczeństwa, tłum. M. Kowalska, Warszawa 1998
  15. Gencarella S.O., Constituting Folklore: A Case for Critical Folklore Studies, „The Journal of American Folklore” 2009, 122(484), s. 172–196
  16. Giddens A., The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge 1990
  17. Gotlib H., Projekt ustawy o przymusie wystawiania obrazów dawnych mistrzów, „Głos Plastyków” 1932, 4
  18. Graczyk P., Sala neoplastyczna w Łodzi, „Kronos” [plik MOBI] 2015, 3, s. 51–52
  19. Habermas J., Filozoficzny dyskurs nowoczesności, tłum. M. Łukasiewicz, Kraków 2004
  20. Inni. Od Nikifora do Głowackiej, opr. A. Jackowski [katalog wystawy], Warszawa 1965
  21. Kondziela H., Malinowski Kazimierz (1907–1977), w: Polski Słownik Biograficzny Konserwatorów Zabytków, Poznań 2000, 1, s. 47–49
  22. Korduba P., Ludowość na sprzedaż. Towarzystwo Popierania Przemysłu Ludowego, Cepelia, Instytut Wzornictwa Przemysłowego, Warszawa 2013
  23. Kubiak Sz.P., Daleko od Moskwy. Gérard Singer i sztuka zaangażowana, Szczecin 2016
  24. Leder A., Prześniona rewolucja: ćwiczenie z logiki historycznej, Warszawa 2014
  25. MacLagan D., Outsiders or Insiders, w: The Myth of Primitivism. Perspectives on Art, red. S. Hiller, London and New York 2005
  26. Minturn K., Dubuffet, Lévi-Strauss, and the Idea of Art Brut, „RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics” 2004, 46, s. 247–258
  27. Oesterreich D., Flight into Security: A New Approach and Measure of the Authoritarian Personality, „Political Psychology” 2005, 2(26), s. 275–297
  28. Ostrowski A., Hugo Kołłątaj i łagodna rewolucja 1791 r., „Kuźnica” 1945, 4–5
  29. Phillips R.B., Disrupting Past Paradigms: The National Museum of the American Indian and the First Peoples Hall at the Canadian Museum of Civilization, „The Public Historian” 2006, 2(28), s. 75–80
  30. Pierson Ch., Conversations with Anthony Giddens. Making Sense of Modernity, Cambridge 1998
  31. Piotrowski P., Globalne ujęcie sztuki Europy Wschodniej, Poznań 2018
  32. Pokaz obrazów i dzieł sztuki ze zbiorów Potockich zabezpieczonych przez władze bezpieczeństwa przed wywozem za granicę [katalog wystawy listopad–grudzień 1946, Muzeum Narodowe], Warszawa 1946
  33. Preziosi D., The Question of Art History, „Critical Inquiry” 1992, 2(18), s. 363–386
  34. Preziosi D., The Art of Art History. A Critical Anthology, Oxford 2009
  35. Reichardt R., H. Kohle, Visualising the Revolution. Politics and Pictorial Arts in Late
  36. Eighteenth-Century France, tłum. C. Attwood, London 2008
  37. Rich S.K., Jean Dubuffet: The Butterfly Man, „October” 2007, 119, s. 46–74
  38. Shiner L., The Invention of Art: A Cultural History, Chicago 2001
  39. Sławska A., „No i co teraz zrobimy?” Pamiętnik z pewnej wycieczki, Poznań 2019
  40. Szymanowicz M., Zaburzona epoka. Polska fotografia artystyczna w latach 1945–1955, Poznań 2016
  41. Świtek G., „Inni” w kanonie nowoczesności, w: Polska – kraj folkloru?, red. J. Kordjak, Warszawa 2016, s. 171–179
  42. Włodarczyk W., Pięć lat, w: Zaraz po wojnie, red. J. Kordjak, A. Szewczyk, Warszawa 2015
  43. Wojcik D., Outsider Art, Vernacular Traditions, Trauma, and Creativity, „Western Folklore” 2008, 2–3(67), s. 179–198
  44. Woynarowski J., Taksydermia, „Kronos” [plik MOBI] 2015, 3, s. 53–59
  45. Zachwatowicz J., Program i zasady konserwacji zabytków, „Biuletyn Historii Sztuki i Kultury” 1946, 1–2
  46. Zaraz po wojnie, red. J. Kordjak, A. Szewczyk, Warszawa 2015
  47. Zychowicz K., Paryska lewica w stalinowskiej Warszawie, Warszawa 2014