L’Imagination au pouvoir: historia sztuki w czasach kryzysu lat 60./70

Main Article Content

Andrzej Turowski

Abstrakt

The present paper is reminiscence and an attempt to reconstruct the intellectual heritage of art history as it was practiced at the University of Poznań in the late 1960s and throughout the 1970s in the context of new developments in cultural theory and changing research interests. Besides, it includes the author’s account of his own academic work in that period, began in the 1960s and inspired in particular by the year 1968 that brought a social crisis and a cultural revolution, as well as introduced the element of imagination into academic knowledge and critical thought. The author draws a wide panorama of intellectual stimuli which contributed to an epistemic and methodological turn, first in his own scholarly work and then in the work of some other art historians in Poznań. Those turns opened art history at the University of Poznań to critical reading of artistic practices approached in relation to other social practices and subjects of power. As a result, four key problems were addressed: (1) the position of contemporary art in research and teaching, (2) the necessity to combine detailed historical studies with critical theoretical reflection, (3) the questioning of genre boundaries and ontological statuses of the objects of study and the semantic frames of the work of art, and finally, in connection to the rise of an interdisciplinary perspective, (4) the subversion of the boundaries and identity of art history as an academic discipline. Then the author reconstructs the theoretical background of the “new art history” that emerged some time later, drawing from the writings of Walter Benjamin, the French structuralism, Theodor Adorno’s aesthetic theory, and Louis Althusser’s interpretation of the concept of ideology. Another important problematic was the avant-garde art of Poland and other East-Central European countries, studiedin terms of artistic geography and the relations between the center and periphery. The conclusion of the paper presents a framework marked with the names of Aby Warburg and Max Dvořák, which connected the tradition of art history with new developments, took under consideration the seminal element of crisis, and allowed art historians to address a complex network of relations among the artist’s studio, the curator’s practice, the scholar’s study, and the university seminar, as well as the West, the Center, and the East. At last, the author remembers the revolutionary, rebellious spirit and the lesson of imagination that the Poznań art history took from March and May, 1968.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Dział
PRZEŁOMY: HISTORIE HISTORII SZTUKI W POLSCE I EUROPIE

Bibliografia

  1. Feyerabend P.K., Against Method, London and New York 1993
  2. Foucault M., Przedmowa do transgresji, tłum. T. Komendant, w: Powiedziane, napisane. Szaleństwo i literatura, wybrał i oprac. T. Komendant, Warszawa 1999
  3. Kryzysy w sztuce. Materiały z sesji Stowarzyszenia Historyków Sztuki, Lublin, grudzień 1985, red. E. Karwowska, Warszawa 1988
  4. Proceedings of Les relations du constructivisme d’Europe de l’Est et d’Europe Centrale avec l’avant-garde des deux premiers décénnies du XX siècle conference, Gołuchów 1980, Ligeia, 1989, 5–6, s. 31–131
  5. Turowski A., Konstruktywizm wschodnio- i środkowoeuropejski w powiązaniu z awangardą dwóch pierwszych dekad XX wieku, „Artium Quaestiones” 1983, 2, s. 188–190
  6. Turowski A., Existe-t-il un art de l’Europe de l’Est?, Paris 1986
  7. Wallerstein I., Utopistics: Or Historical Choices for the Twenty-First Century, New York 1998
  8. Zola É., J’accuse!, „L’Aurore” 13 stycznia 1898