On Belatedness. The Shaping of Portuguese Art History in Modern Times

Main Article Content

Mariana Pinto dos Santos


Portuguese art history experienced remarkable development after World War II, especially with the work of José-Augusto França, who was responsible for establishing a historiographic canon for nineteenth- and twentieth-century Portuguese art that still endures. José-Augusto França developed a narrative that held Paris up as an artistic and cultural role model in relation to which he diagnosed a permanent delay in Portuguese art. This essay analyses França’s idea of belatedness in the context of Portuguese art historiography and political history and how it is part of a genealogy of intellectual thought produced in an imperial context, revisiting previous art historians and important authors, such as Antero de Quental and António Sérgio. Moreover, it aims to address how the concept of belatedness was associated with the idea of “civilisation” and the idea of “art as civilisation.” Belatedness also has implications in the constraints and specificities of writing a master narrative in a peripheral country – a need particularly felt in the second half of the twentieth century, to mark a political standpoint against the dictatorship that ruled from 1926 to 1974. Part of the reaction to fascism expressed the desire to follow other nations’ democratic example, but the self-deprecating judgements on Portuguese art were frequently associated with the identification of essentialist motifs – the “nature” of the Portuguese people, their way of thinking, of living, their lack of capacities or skills – and of a self-image of being “primitive” in comparison with other European countries that has antecedents going back to the eighteenth century. I will address the nostalgia for the empire and the prevailing notion of belatedness throughout the twentieth century regarding unsolved issues with that nostalgia.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Pinto dos Santos , M. (2019). On Belatedness. The Shaping of Portuguese Art History in Modern Times. Artium Quaestiones, (30), 37-64. https://doi.org/10.14746/aq.2019.30.29
Biogram autora

Mariana Pinto dos Santos , Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Universidade Nova de LisboaPhD, art historian and independent curator; PhD in History and Theory (Facultat de Belles Arts, University of Barcelona). Integrated researcher at the Institute of History of Art, NOVA FCSH (Lisbon, Portugal). Published a book and essays in catalogues and magazines on twentieth-century Portuguese artists, modernity and modernisms, historiography and theory of art. Published internationally in RIHA Journal and Konsthistorisk tidskrift/Journal of Art History. Co-coordinator for the funded research project Iberian Modernisms and the Primitivist Imaginary (2018–21).Institute of History of Art, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Avenida de Berna, 26-C / 1069-061 Lisbon, República Portuguesa


  1. Alexandre V., “O processo de independência do Brasil” and “Nação e Império,” in: História da Expansão Portuguesa, eds. F. Bethencourt and K. Chauduri, vol. 4: Do Brasil para África, Lisboa 1998
  2. Alexandre V., “O império português (1825–1890): ideologia e economia,” Análise Social 2004, 39(169), pp. 959–979
  3. Almeida B. P. de, Pintura Portuguesa do Século XX, Porto 1994
  4. Almeida O. T., “Antero de Quental on the Causes of the Decline of the Iberian Peoples: A Revisitation,” Mediterranean Studies 1989, 1
  5. Amin S., Eurocentrism. Modernity, Religion, and Democracy. A Critique of Eurocentrism and Culturalism, New York 2009 [1988]
  6. Beiser F., The German Historicist Tradition, Oxford University Press, 2011
  7. Benjamin W., “On the Concept of History” [1940], in: idem, Selected Writings, eds. H. Eiland, M. W. Jennings, vol. 4, Harvard University Press, 2003
  8. Carneiro A., A. Simões, M. P. Diogo, “Enlightenment Science in Portugal: The Estrangeirados and Their Communication Networks,” Social Studies of Science 2000, 30(4)
  9. Chakrabarty D., Provincializing Europe. Post-colonial thought and historical difference, Princeton University Press, 2008 [2000]
  10. Cooper F., “States, Empires, and Political Imagination,” in: idem, Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History, Berkeley 2005
  11. Curto D. R., “Preface,” in: M. B. Jerónimo, Livros Brancos, Almas Negras. A «missão civilizadora» do colonialismo português 1870–1930, Lisbon 2009
  12. Eagleton T., F. Jameson, E. Said, Nationalism, Colonialism and Literature, Minneapolis/London 1990
  13. Foucault M., The Order of Things, New York 1970 [1966]
  14. França J.-A., Pintura Abstracta Portuguesa em 1960, Lisbon 1960
  15. França J.-A., Lisboa Pombalina e o Iluminismo, Lisbon 1966 [1965]
  16. França J.-A., A Arte e a Sociedade Portuguesa no Século XX, Lisbon 1972 [1963]
  17. França J.-A., As Conferências do Casino no Parlamento, Lisbon 1973
  18. França J.-A., O Romantismo em Portugal, 6 vol., Lisbon 1974 [1969]
  19. França J.-A., A Arte em Portugal no Século XIX, Lisbon 1990 [1967]
  20. França J.-A., A Arte em Portugal no Século XX, Lisbon 1991 [1974]
  21. França J.-A., “Verdade Prática e Verdades Práticas” [1963]; “Sobre História (Sociológica) da Arte” [1979/81] and “O ‘facto artístico’ na sociologia da arte” [1987], in: (In) definições de Cultura, Lisbon 1997
  22. França J.-A. interviewed by J. C. Saraiva, Sol, Lisbon, May 2016
  23. Francastel P., Art and Technology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, New York 2000 [1956]
  24. Gomes P.V., “Cyrillo Volkmar Machado e a História da Arte em Portugal na transição do século XVIII para o século XIX,” in: idem, A Cultura Arquitectónica e Artística em Portugal no século XVIII, Lisbon 1988
  25. Gonçalves A. M., “Historiografia de Arte em Portugal,” Boletim da Biblioteca da Universidade de Coimbra 1960, 25
  26. Gonçalves R. M., História da Arte em Portugal, vol. 13: Pioneiros da Modernidade, Lisbon 1988
  27. Jerónimo M. B., Livros Brancos, Almas Negras. A «missão civilizadora» do colonialismo português 1870–1930, Lisbon 2009
  28. Jerónimo M. B., “The ‘Civilisation Guild’: Race and Labour in the Third Portuguese Empire, c. 1870–1930,” in: Racism and ethnic relations in the Portuguese-speaking world, eds. F. Bethencourt and A. J. Pearce, New York 2012
  29. Lourenço E., “Os Círculos dos Delaunay ou o Estatuto da nossa Pintura,” in: idem, O Espelho Imaginário. Pintura, Anti-Pintura, Não-Pintura, Lisbon 1996 [1971]
  30. Osborne P., “Historicism as bad modernity,” in: idem, The Politics of Time: Modernity and the Avant-Garde, London 1995
  31. Pereira P. (ed.), História da Arte Portuguesa, vol. 3, Lisbon 1995
  32. Piotrowski P., “Toward a Horizontal Art History of the European Avant-Garde,” in: Europa! Europa? The Avant-Garde, Modernism and the Fate of a Continent, ed. S. Bru et al., New York 2009
  33. Portela A., Salazarismo e Artes Plásticas, Biblioteca Breve, 1982
  34. Quental A. de, Causas da Decadência dos Povos Peninsulares [1871], Lisbon [no date]
  35. Rodrigues D. (ed.), Arte Portuguesa. Da Pré-História ao Século XX, vol. 14: Expressões do Neo-Clássico (P. V. Gomes); vol. 18: O modernismo I (J. Pinharanda); vol. 19: O modernismo II (B. P. de Almeida), Vila Nova de Gaia 2009
  36. Rosas F., Salazar e os fascismos, Lisbon 2019
  37. Rosmaninho N., “Estratégia e Metodologia na Historiografia Artística Portuguesa (1846–1935),” Revista da Universidade de Aveiro. Letras 1997, 14
  38. Said E., Orientalism, New York 2004 [1978]
  39. Salgueiro A. R.,“A Arte em Portugal no século XX (1911–1961).” José-Augusto França e a perspectiva Sociológica, Lisbon 2012
  40. Sérgio A., “O reino cadaveroso ou o problema da cultura em Portugal,” in: idem, Ensaios II, Lisbon 1972 (2nd edition)
  41. Seuphor M., M. Ragon, L’Art abstrait, 1939–1970, Paris 1973
  42. Sousa Santos B. de, Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemice, New York 2014
  43. Vlachou F., “Why Spatial? Time and the periphery,” Visual Resources 2016, 32(1–2), pp. 9–24
  44. Vlachou F., The Disappointed Writer. Selected Essays, Lisbon 2019