Abstrakt
Each photograph captures an artwork within a particular frame of space and time, providing a perspective that is contingent and dependent on the era the photograph was made in (Bergstein 1992). Moreover, every photograph is always embedded in specific material conditions and has its own social life (Edwards–Hart 2004). The aim of this article is to show the particularity of reproductions of artworks in 1930s Czechoslovakia and the motivations and discussions behind the extensive use of detail. I argue that the pronounced interest in close-up views is a result of a series of circumstances specific to the period. There is an important pre-condition in the development in the field of art photography and graphic design that took place in the late 1920s, bringing about an interest in sharp and faithful images and full bleed prints, as well as a recognition of the social impact of the medium. As a result, photographers, artists, art historians, and graphic designers living in Czechoslovakia also began to rethink the use of photography in the art field. This was manifested in period publications such as the well-known Fotografie vidí povrch (Photography Sees the Surface), published in 1935. In terms of art reproductions, it shows the importance of close-up views for providing an insight into individual artistic approaches and into the history of the respective artwork. The same year saw the publication of the 31st volume of the art magazine Volné směry, which enables us to follow several micro-histories that can also be applied more generally to the period discussions. As illustrated by a text by Bohuslav Slánský and the reproduced photographs of medieval panel portraits from Karlštejn Castle attributed to Master Theodoric, one of the purposes behind the commissions of enlarged photographic details of artworks were planned restorations. Moreover, examples from the photographic campaigns led by the company of Jan Štenc, the State Photo-Measurement Institute, or the project by Karel Šourek, Alexandr Paul, and František Illek (Documenta Bohemia Artis Phototypica) show that detail is generally used for showing the structure and texture of the work, for zooming in on otherwise distant works, or for the purpose of comparison. According to Volné směry editor-in-chief Emil Filla and his manifesto article “Práce oka”, the new method of working with reproductions and the frequent use of photographic detail precipitated a change in the observational habits of the audience. This intention was materialised through his long-term collaboration with the photographer Josef Sudek, who helped him show the artworks in a new light. It is evident that by the mid-1930s, the synergic work of individuals from different fields brought the use of detail in art-related publications to an unprecedented level.
Bibliografia
Bartlová M., Dějiny českých dějin umění 1945–1969 [The History of Czech Art History 1945–1969], Prague 2020
Batchen G., Apparitions, Photography and Dissemination, Sydney, Prague 2018
Batchen G., Obraz a diseminace: za novou historii pro fotografii [Image and Dissemination: Towards a New History of Photography], Prague 2016
Baxandall M., The Limewood Sculpture of Renaissance Germany, New Haven and London 1980
Bergstein M., “Lonely Aphrodites: On the Documentary Photography of Sculpture”, The Art Bulletin 1992, 74(3), pp. 475–498 https://doi.org/10.2307/3045895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3045895
Birgus V., J. Mlčoch, Czech Photography of the 20th Century, Prague 2010
Blower J.B., “Max Dvořák, Wilhelm von Bode and The Monuments of German Art”,Ars 2011, 44(1), pp. 92–124
Bohrer F.N., “Photographic Perspectives. Photography and the Institutional Formation of Art History”, in: Art History and Its Institutions, ed. E. Mansfield, London 2002, pp. 246–259
Buddeus H., “Mlsný a zvědavý V.V. Štech” [The Sweet-toothed and Curious V.V. Štech], in: T. Dvořák et al., Fotografie, socha, object [Photography, Sculpture, Object], Prague 2017
Chalupecký J., “Středověké sochy” [Medieval Sculptures], Světozor 1933, 33(35), pp. 4–5
Czech Photographic Avant-garde 1918–1948, ed. V. Birgus, Prague 2002
Dufek A., “Fotografie dvacátých let” [Photography of the 1920s] and “Fotografie třicátých let” [Photography in the 1930s], in: Dějiny českého výtvarného umění 1890–1938 [The History of Czech Fine Art 1890–1938], IV/2, Prague 1998, pp. 205–221 and 323–353
Dufek A., “Jaromír Funke and Czech Photography, 1920–39”, in: Object: Photo. Modern Photographs: The Thomas Walther Collection 1909–1949, New York 2014, available online: <https://www.moma.org/interactives/objectphoto/assets/essays/Dufek.pdf> [accessed: February 20, 2022]
Dufek A., “Světlo, stín a objekt v české fotografii třicátých let” [Light, Shadow, and Object in Czech Photography of the 1930s], in: Linie / Barva / Tvar [Line / Colour /Form], ed. H. Rousová, Prague 1988, pp. 87–113
Dufek A., U. Eskildsen, Tschechische Fotografie 1918–1938, Essen 1984
Edwards E., Raw Histories: Photographs, Anthropology and Museums, Oxford and New York 2001
Edwards E., J. Hart, “Introduction. Photographs as Objects”, in: Photographs, Objects, Histories. On the Materiality of Images, ed. E. Edwards, J. Hart, London 2004, p. 2 and 4 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203506493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203506493
Fárová A., Josef Sudek, Prague 1995
Filla E., “Práce oka” [The Work of the Eye], Volné směry 1935, 31, pp. 22–24
Filla E., “Úvod k románské plastice” [An Introduction to Romanesque Sculpture], Volné směry 1935, 31, pp. 214–231
Fotografie vidí povrch. La Photographie reflète l’aspect des choses [Photography Sees the Surface], ed. J. Funke, L. Sutnar, Prague 1935
Friedl A., “Zdeněk Wirth a státní ústav fotoměřický” [Zdeněk Wirth and the State Photo-Measurement Institute], Zprávy památkové péče 1938, pp. 124–125
Funke J., “Fotografie zůstane fotografií” [Photography Will Remain Photography], Volné směry 1935, 31, p. 48.
“Is photography art?”, Světozor 1936, 36(29)
Jarjat J., “Michelangelo’s Frescoes through the Camera’s Lens: The Photographic Album and Visual Identity”, Studies in the History of Art 2011, 77, pp. 151–172
Johnson G.A., Sculpture and Photography: Envisioning the Third Dimension, Cambridge 1999
Johnson G.A., “‘(Un)richtige Aufnahme’: Renaissance Sculpture and the Visual Historiography of Art History”, Art History 2013, 36(1), pp. 12–51 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8365.2012.00917.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8365.2012.00917.x
Květ J., “Akvamanile z Hradce Králové v Národním muzeu v Praze” [The Hradec Králové Aquamanile at the National Museum in Prague], Volné směry 1935, 31, pp. 250–257
Květ J., “K obrazům z evangelistáře Vratislavova, zvaného Kodexem vyšehradským” [On the Paintings of Vratislav’s Evangeliary, Known as the Vyšehrad Codex], Volné směry 1935, 31, pp. 24–30
Linhart L., “Fotografie objevuje svět” [Photography Discovers the World], Panorama 1935, 6, p. 84
Linhart L., Sociální fotografie [Social Photography], Prague 1934
Matějček A., Česká malba gotická [Czech Gothic Painting], Prague 1938
Mlčoch J., “Josef Sudek and the Photography of Works of Art – his Predecessors and Contemporaries”, in: Instant Presence: Representing Art in Photography, ed. H. Buddeus, V. Lahoda, K. Mašterová, Prague 2017, pp. 59–79
Parkmann F., “A Czechoslovak Variation on Fifo”, Études Photographiques 2012, 29, available online <https://journals.openedition.org/etudesphotographiques/3475> [accessed: February 20, 2022]
Paul A., F. Illek, K. Šourek, Deskové obrazy Mistra Theodoricha na Karlštejně z XIV.st. [The 14th-century Panel Paintings of Master Theodoric at Karlštejn Castle], Documenta Bohemiae Artis Phototypica, undated
Photo Archives and the Idea of Nation, ed. C. Caraffa, T. Serena, Berlin 2015
Photo Archives and the Photographic Memory of Art History, ed. C. Caraffa, Berlin 2011
Photo-Objects: On the Materiality of Photographs and Photo Archives, ed. J. Bärnighausen, C. Caraffa, S. Klamm, F. Schneider, P. Wodtke, Berlin 2019, available online: <https://www.mprl-series.mpg.de/studies/12/2/index.html> [accessed: February 18, 2022]
Photographs, Objects, Histories. On the Materiality of Images, ed. E. Edwards, J. Hart, London 2004
Photography and Sculpture: The Art Object in Reproduction, eds. S. Hamill and M.R. Luke, Los Angeles 2017
Pospěchová E., “Documenta Bohemiae Artis Phototypica. ‘Vlasti služ! I svou fotografií!’” [Documenta Bohmiae Artis Phototypica. ‘Serve the Nation! In Your Photography,Too!’], in: Ve službách českých knížat a králů. Kniha k poctě profesora Jiřího Kuthana [In the Service of Czech Princes and Kings. A Book to the Honour of Professor Jiří Kuthan], ed. M. Šmied, F. Záruba, Prague 2013, pp. 349–357
Pygmalion Photographe. La Sculpture devant la caméra, 1844–1936, eds. R.M. Mason, H. Pinet, Geneva 1985
Savedoff B.E., “Transforming Images: Photographs of Representations”, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 1992, 2, pp. 345–356 https://doi.org/10.2307/430949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/430949
Sculpter-Photographier. Photographie-Sculpture, ed. M. Frizot, D. Païni, Paris 1993
Sculpture and Photography: Envisioning the Third Dimension, ed. G.A. Johnson, Cambridge 1998
Škabrada J., “Štencův archiv negativů” [Štenc’s Archive of Negatives], Historická fotografie 2007, 7, pp. 23–31
Slánský B., “O restaurování obrazů” [On the Restoration of Paintings], Umění 1931, 4, p. 173
Slánský B., “Oprava obrazů z hradu Karlštejna” [The Restoration of Paintings at Karlštejn Castle], Volné směry 1935, 31, pp. 205–210
Slánský B., “Oprava obrazů z hradu Karlštejna” [The Restoration of Paintings at Karlštejn Castle], Volné směry 1937, 33, pp. 26–28
Slánský B., “Oprava tabulových obrazů v kapli sv. Kříže na hradě Karlštejně” [The Restoration of the Panel Paintings at the Chapel of the Holy Cross on Karlštejn Castle], Zprávy památkové péče 1938, 2, pp. 24–27
Slánský B., “Zkoumání obrazů přírodovědeckými metodami” [Examining Paintings Using the Methods of the Natural Sciences], Umění 1932, 5, pp. 371–372
Šourek K., “Fotografie a umění, Documenta Bohemiae Artis Phototypica” [Photography and Art, Documenta Bohemiae Artis Phototypica], Fotografie 1945, 1(2), pp. 26–28
Štech V.V., “Smysl a metoda dějin výtvarného umění” [The Meaning and Method of the History of Fine Art], Umění 1938, 11, pp. 455–459
Sto let české fotografie 1839–1939 [One Hundred Years of Czech Photography 1839–1939], ed. Z. Wirth, Prague 1939
Sudek and Sculpture, ed. H. Buddeus, Prague 2020
Tausk P., “The Roots of Modern Photography in Czechoslovakia”, History of Photography 1979, 3(3), pp. 253–271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03087298.1979.10441110
Teige K., “The Tasks of Modern Photography”, in: Photography in the Modern Era, ed. Ch. Phillips, New York 1989, pp. 312–322
Teige K., “Úkoly moderní fotografie” [The Tasks of Modern Photography], in: Moderná tvorba užitková, Bratislava 1931, pp. 77–78
The Kiss of Apollo: Photography and Sculpture 1845 to the Present, ed. J. Fraenkel, San Francisco 1992
Toman J., Foto/montáž tiskem / Photo/montage in print, Prague 2009
Volavka V., Josef Václav Myslbek, Prague 1942
Volavka V., Karel Purkyně, Prague 1942
Volavka V., Malba a malířský rukopis [Painting and Brush-work], Prague 1939
Volavka V., Malířský rukopis ve francouzském obraze nové doby [Painterly Styles in French Paintings of Modernity], Prague 1934
Witkovsky M.S., Foto: Modernity in Central Europe: 1918–1945, Washington 2007
Witkowsky M.S., J. Toman, “Scratching the Surface of Czech Modern Photography”, in: Photography Sees the Surface. La photographie reflète l’aspect des choses, ed. L. Sutnar, J. Funke, Ann Arbor 2004
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2022 Hana Buddeus
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Prawo autorskie regulowane jest oświadczeniem autora przygotowanym przez Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM a od nr XXVIII także umową licencyjną na publikację online zawartą pomiędzy Autorem i Uniwersytetem im. Adama Mickiewicza. Autorzy ponoszą odpowiedzialność za oryginalność zamieszczanego materiału tekstowego oraz regulację praw autorskich dotyczących materiałów ilustracyjnych. W przypadku, gdy materiały pochodzą od redakcji – odpowiedzialność ponosi redakcja czasopisma.
Ten utwór dostepny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.