Pragnienie i zamiar: przyczynek do dystynkcji pojęć

Main Article Content

Gerhard Seel


To answer the title question there has been initially introduced the elements of the Aristotle theory in order to confront it with the concepts of the linguistic paradigm philosophers. Finally, the author proposes a very own solution to this dilemma. Accordingly to the methodology of the linguistic paradigm, the paper brings about an analyse of the linguistic expressions to investigate whether they provide a sufficient premise to distinguish between desires and intentions. The author asks several questions which help him describe desires, and them confront achieved characteristics with the essential features of intentions. In conclusion, the paper put forward the case of the explanation of actions according to both desires and intentions


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Seel, G. (2014). Pragnienie i zamiar: przyczynek do dystynkcji pojęć. ETHICS IN PROGRESS, 5(2), 21-36.
Moral Self and Environment: Difficult Interrelations


  1. Arystoteles, 1988. O duszy. Tłum. P. Siwek. Warszawa: PWN.
  2. Davidson, R. 1980. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Hieke, A. 2006. Pragmatische Selbstwidersprüchlichkeit und pragmatische Analytizität. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.
  4. Hume, D. 1963. Traktat o naturze ludzkiej. Tłum. Cz. Znamierowski. Warszawa: PWN.
  5. Kenny, A. 1963. Action, Emotion and Will. Bristol: Thoemmes.
  6. Kenny, A. 1966. “Intention and Purpose.” Journal of Philosophy 63: 642-651.
  7. Kenny, A. 1973. The Anatomy of the Soul. Historical Essays in the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell.
  8. Moore, G. E. 1942. “A Reply to my Critics.” In Schilpp, P. A. (Ed.), The Philosophy of G. E. Moore. La Salle, III: Open Court Publishing, pp. 533-688.
  9. Moore, G. E. 1944. “Russell’s ‘Theory of Descriptions’.“ In Schilpp, P. A. (Ed.), The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell. La Salle, III: Open Court Publishing, pp.177-225.
  10. Roughley, N. 2006. Wanting and Intending, Elements of a Philosophy of Practical Mind (unpublished manuscript).
  11. Seel, G. 2004. “Décision et Rationalité.“ In Esfeld, M. & Tétaz. J.-M. (Eds.), Généalogie de la pensée moderne. Volume d’hommages à Ingeborg Schüssler. Frankfurt/Main: Ontos Verlag, pp. 396-412.
  12. Smith, M. 1994. The Moral Problem. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  13. Williams, B. 1970. “Deciding to Believe.” In Problems of the Self. Philosophical Papers 1956-1972. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 136-151.