Keywords
paradox
antinomy
set theoretical antinomies
semantical antinomies
paralogism
sophism
antinomy
set theoretical antinomies
semantical antinomies
paralogism
sophism
How to Cite
Tworak, Z. (2012). Paradoxes. Public Philosophy & Democratic Education, 1(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.14746/fped.2012.1.1.7
Abstract
An important part of philosophical thinking are paradoxes. Many of them raise serious problems and are associated with crises of thought and revolutionary advances in the science. This paper is devoted to the notion of paradox and presents a potpourri of paradoxes. I give a very broad interpretation of the term paradox, far broader than will appeal to many logical purists.References
Clark M., Paradoxes from A to Z, Routledge, London–New York 2002.
Łukowski P., Paradoksy, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2006.
Sainsbury R.M., Paradoxes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1995.
Tworak Z., Kłamstwo kłamcy i zbiór zbiorów. O problemie antynomii, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań 2004.
Żabski E., Prawdziwe czyli fałszywe. Nowe „rozwiązania” paradoksów i antynomii, Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT, Wrocław 2010.
License
Copyright (c) Authors retain copyright and publishing rights to their articles in this journal, granting the journal the right to distribute them under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0