The teleology of the sign user

Main Article Content

Byron Almen

Abstrakt

In my 2009 book A Theory of Musical Narrative, I argued that narrativity in music can be productively understood according to the principle of transvaluation as defined by the American semiotician James Jakob Liszka. An important aspect of this principle — and hence of musical narrative — is what Liszka describes as “the teleology of the sign user”: that is to say, the critical role played by the interpreter’s cognitive, cultural, and ideological perspective in formulating and presenting an interpretation. When this role is considered at all, it is frequently confined to a general, cautionary usage wherein the notion of a single, “correct” narrative interpretation of a work is repudiated and a sensitivity to context encouraged. In this chapter, I attempt to move beyond this general usage to consider ways in which it might be more fully characterized and formalized. To that end, I consider certain interpretive perspectives that might be characterized as possessing a cognitive (as opposed to a situational or cultural) component and understood within a framework of binary oppositions. In particular, I call attention to the fundamental formative roles that such perspectives can play in shaping and directing interpretive details. For example, the perception of — and hermeneutic engagement with — patterns deemed to be of narrative significance can arise either from a bounded (or centripetal) perspective, in which case the interpretive details tend to reinforce one another, circling around a relatively unified and coherent narrative, or they can arise from an unbounded (or centrifugal) perspective, in which case the interpretive details tend to push outward, suggesting the possibility of other non-selected yet viable alternative narratives. These and other binary formulations to be discussed are applied to musical narratives but also have implications for narrative interpretation in general.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Dział
Articles

Referencje

  1. Almen, Byron. A Theory of Musical Narrative. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009.
  2. Almen, Byron. “Modes of Analysis.” Theory and Practice 31 (2006): 1-38.
  3. Almen, Byron. “Musical ‘Temperament’: Theorists and the Functions of Musical Analysis.” Theoria 12 (2005): 31-68.
  4. Beebe, John. “The Battle Within: How Interactions Between Our Archetypes and Our Functions Affect Us.” Unpublished lecture. August 4-7, 2010, Berea, OH.
  5. Buhler, James. “Theme, Thematic Process, and Variant Form in the Andante Moderato of Mahler’s Sixth Symphony.” In Perspectives on Gustav Mahler. Edited by Jeremy Barham, 261-94. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.
  6. Berens, Linda V. Understanding Yourself and Others: An Introduction to Interaction Styles 2.0. Huntington Beach, CA: Telos Publications, 2008.
  7. Berens, Linda V. Understanding Yourself and Others: An Introduction to the 4 Temperaments 3.0. Huntington Beach, CA: Telos Publications, 2006.
  8. Berens, Linda V. Dynamics of Personality Type: Understanding and Applying Jung’s Cognitive Processes. Huntington Beach, CA: Telos Publications, 1999.
  9. Collins, Randall. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1998.
  10. Darcy, Warren. “Rotational Form, Teleological Genesis, and Fantasy Projection in the Slow Movement of Mahler’s Sixth Symphony.” 19th-Century Music 25.1 (2001): 49-74.
  11. Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1957.
  12. Hatten, Robert S. Interpreting Musical Gestures, Topics, and Tropes: Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004.
  13. Klein, Michael L. Intertextuality in Western Art Music. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005.
  14. Korsyn, Kevin. Decentering Music: A Critique of Contemporary Musical Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
  15. Liszka, James Jakob. The Semiotic of Myth: A Critical Study of the Symbol. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989.
  16. Lopker, John. Pictures of Personality: Guide to the Four Human Natures. Los Angeles: Typology, 2000.
  17. McClaiy, Susan. “The Blasphemy of Talking Politics during a Bach Year.” In Music and Society: The Politics of Composition, Performance, and Reception. Edited by Susan McClary and Richard Leppart, 13-62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  18. Nardi, Dario. Neuroscience of Personality. [PowerPoint slides]. Unpublished. 2009.
  19. Nardi, Dario. This Is Your Brain on Type. [PowerPoint slides]. 2008. Accessed May 2011.
  20. http://www.keys2cognition.com/papers/EEGandSocialCognition.pdf
  21. Nardi, Dario. 8 Keys to Self-Leadership: From Awareness to Action. Huntington Beach, CA: Unite Business Press [Telos Publishing], 2005.
  22. Pearsall, Edward. “Anti-Teleological Art: Articulating Meaning through Silence.” In Approaches to Meaning in Music. Edited by Byron Almen and Edward Pearsall, 41-61. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2006.
  23. Shapiro, Kenneth Joel and Irving E. Alexander. The Experience of Introversion: An Integration of Phenomenological, Empirical, and Jungian Approaches. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1975.