Contemporary Comparative Politics and Revival of Regime Analysis Contra Reviving Aristotle’s Regime Science*
PDF (English)

Słowa kluczowe

polityka Arystotelesa
polityka porównawcza
system(y) polityczny/e

Jak cytować

Bates, Jr., C. A. (2015). Contemporary Comparative Politics and Revival of Regime Analysis Contra Reviving Aristotle’s Regime Science*. Przegląd Politologiczny, (4), 159–176.


W artykule zasugerowano, że porównanie różnych modeli behawioralnych i podejścia post-behawioralnego (rozumianego przede wszystkim jako “powrót państwa” i pojęcie reżimu politycznego, będące wynikiem tego powrotu) w celu porównania systemów politycznych prowadzi do wniosku, że arystotelesowska nauka o reżimie jest nadrzędnym punktem odniesienia dla rozmaitych modeli większości koncepcji reżimu opracowanych w ramach współczesnej politologii porównawczej. Badając wszystkie te próby zmierzające do odrodzenia koncepcji reżimu jako instrumentu analizy zachowań politycznych człowieka dostrzega się, że podejście przyjęte przez Arystotelesa pozwala na celniejsze i dokładniejsze przedstawienie zachowań politycznych występujących w strukturze określonych społeczności politycznych kształtowanych według danego reżimu.
PDF (English)


Almond G. A., Powell Jr. G. B., Dalton R. J., Strom K. (2008), Comparative Politics Today: A World View, 9th edition, Pearson, New York.

Almond G. A. (1988), Return of the State, “The American Political Science Review”, vol. 82, no. 3 (September), pp. 853-874.

Apter D. E. (1988), Rethinking Development, Sage Publications, Newbury Park-Beverly Hills.

Arendt H. (1958), The Human Condition, Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y.

Axelrod R. (1983), The Evolution of Cooperation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Bates C. A. Jr. (2003), Aristotle’s Best Regime, LSU Press, Baton Rouge.

Bates R. (1987), Agrarian Politics, in: Understanding Political Development, eds. Weiner, Huntington, Brown and Co., Boston-Little, pp. 160-195.

Bloom A. (1987). The Closing of the American Mind, Simon and Schuster, New York.

Bodin J. (1993), Les Six livres de la République, Livre de Poche, Paris.

Codevilla A. M. (2009), The Character of Nations: How Politics Makes and Breaks Prosperity, Family and Civility, Revised Edition, Basic Books, New York.

Dahl R. (1964), Modern Political Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

Dahl R. (1956), A Preface to Democratic Theory, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Dahl R. (1971), Polarchy: Participation and Opposition, Yale University Press, New Haven.

Dahl R. (1982), Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy, New Haven, Yale University Press.

de Alvarez L. P. S. (1989), Niccolo Machiavelli: The Prince, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, 1ll.

Dietz M. (2012), Between Polis and Empire: Aristotle’s Politics, “American Political Science Review”, vol. 106, issue 02 (May 2012), pp. 275-293.

Easton D. (1953), The Political System. An Inquiry into the State of Political Science, Knopf, New York.

Evans P. B., Rueschemeyer D., Skocpol T. (1985), Bringing the State Back in, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Ewbank M. B. (2005), Politeia as Focal Reference in Aristotles’s Taxonomy of Regimes, “The Review of Metaphysics”, vol. 53, no. 3.

Farrar C. (1988), The Origins of Democratic Thinking, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Finer S. E. (1997), The History of Government from the Earliest Times, 3 volumes, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Fukuyama F. (1992), The End of History and the Last Man, The Free Press, New York.

Fukuyama F. (2011) The Origins of Political Order, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.

Geertz C. (1965), The Impact of the Concept of Culture on the Concept of Man, in: New Views of the Nature of Man, ed. J. R. Platt, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Geertz C. (1973), Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, New York.

Goldsmith T. H. (1991), The Biological Roots of Human Nature: Forging Links between Evolution and Behavior, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Hansen M. H. (1993), Aristotle’s Alternative to the Sixfold Model of Constitutions, in: Aristote et Ate ’nes = Aristotle and Athens, Seminarie d ’histore ancienn, Fribourge (Suisse).

Hansen M. H. (1994), Polis, Politeuma and Politeia: A Note on Arist. Pol. 1278b6-14, in: From political architecture to Stephanus Byzantius: sources fo r the ancient Greek polis, F. Steiner, Stuttgart.

Hardt M., Negri A. (2000), Empire, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Hintze O. (1975), The Preconditions of Representative Government in the Context of World History, in: The Historical Essays of Otto Hintze, ed. F. Gilbert, Oxford University Press, New York.

Higgot R. A. (1983), Political Development Theory, Croom Helm, London.

Hobbes T. (1991[1651]), Leviathan, ed. R. Tuck, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Huntington S. (1987), The Goals of Development, in: Understanding Political Development, eds. Huntington, Myer, Little, Brown, Boston.

Huntington S. (1981), American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Huntington S. (1968[2006]), Political Order and Changing Societies, Yale University Press, New Haven.

Keyt D., Miller F. (1991), eds., A Companion to Aristotle’s "Politics”, Blackwell, Oxford.

Keyt D. (1999), Aristotle’s Politics Book V and VI, Claredon Press, Oxford.

Keyt D. (1987), Three Fundamental Theorems in Aristotle’s Politics, Phronesis 32, pp. 54-79.

Lilla M. ed. (1994), New French Thought: Political Philosophy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Lord C. (1984), Aristotle: The Politics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

LordC. (1987), Aristotle, in: History of Political Philosophy, eds. L. Strauss, J. Cropsey, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 118-154.

Lord C. (2003), The Modern Prince: What Leaders Need to Know Now, Yale University Press, New Haven, Ct.

Lord C. (2012), Proconsuls: Delegated Political-Military Leadership from Rome to America Today, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Lowenthal A. (2009), Samuel P. Huntington 1927-2008, “New Perspectives Quarterly”, vol. 26, no. 2.

Manent P. (1994a), An Intellectual History of Liberalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Manent P. (1994b), The Modern State, Lilla, pp. 123-133.

Manent P. (1994c), The Contest for Command, Lilla, pp. 178-185.

Manent P. (2006), A World Beyond Politics: A Defense of the Nation-State, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Manent P. (2007), Democracy Without Nations? The Fate of Self-Government in Europe, ISI Press, Wilmington DE.

Manent P. (2010), Les Metamorphose de la cite, Flammarion, Paris.

Mansfield Jr. H. C. (1983), On the Impersonality of the Modern State: A Comment on Machiavelli’s Use of Stato, “American Political Science Review”, 77, pp. 849-857.

Mansfield Jr. H. C. (1989), Taming the Prince, The Free Press, New York.

Mansfield Jr. H. C. (1995), Self-Interest Rightly Understood, “Political Theory”, vol. 21, no. 1 (Feburary), pp. 48-66.

Masters R. D. (1989a), The Nature of Politics, Yale University Press, New Haven.

Masters R. D. (1989b), Gradualism and Discontinuous Change in Evolutionary Theory and Politica; Philosophy, “Journal of Social and Biological Structures”, vol. 12, pp. 281-301.

Masters R. D. (1991), Naturalistic Approaches to the Concept of Justice, “American Behavioral Scientist”, 34,3 (January/February), pp. 289-313.

Masters R. D. (1993), Beyond Relativism: Science and Human Values, University of New England Press, Hanover, N. H.

Meier Ch (1990), The Greek Discovery of Politics, trans. D. McLintock, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Munck G. L., Snyder R. (2007), Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.

Nichols M. P. (1991), Citizens and Statesmen, Rowman and Littlefield, Savage, Maryland.

Nussbaum M. (1992), Human Functioning and Social Justice: In Defense of Aristotelian Essentialism, “Political Theory”, 20, 3 (May), pp. 202-246.

Nussbaum M., Sen A. (1993), The Quality of Life, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Popper K. (1945), The Enemies of the Open Society, 2 vols., Routledge and Kegan and Paul, London.

Palmer M. (1989), Dilemmas of Political Development, F. E. Peacock, Itasca, Illinois.

Pocock J. G. A., (1975), The Machiavellian Moment, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Pompkin S. (1979), The Rational Peasant, University of California Press, Berkeley.

Pye L., Verba S. (1965), Political Culture and Political Development, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Ricci D. M. (1984), The Tragedy of Political Science: Politics, Scholarship and Democracy, Yale University Press, New Haven, Ct.

Robinson R. (1962), Aristotle’s Politics Book III and IV, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Rousseau J.-J. (1978), On the Social Contract, ed. R. Masters, trans. J. Masters, St. Martins Press, New York.

Rousseau J.-J. (1964), The First and Second Discourses by Jean-Jacques Rousseau, translated by R. D. Masters, J. R. Masters, St. Martin’s Press, New York.

Schmitt C. (1976), The Concept of the Political, trans. G. Schwab, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.

Scott J. (1976), The Moral Economy of The Peasant, Yale University Press, New Haven.

Siaroff A. (2009), Comparing Political Regimes: A Thematic Introduction to Comparative Politics, 2nd edition, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario.

Simpson P. (1997), The Politics of Aristotle-Translation and Introduction, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

Tilly Ch. (2006), Regimes and Repertoires, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Tocqueville A. de (2000) Democracy in America, trans. and edited by H. C. Mansfield Jr, D. Winthrop, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Wallerstein I. (1990), The States in the Institutional Vortex o f the Capitalist World Economy, “International Social Science Journal”, 32, 4, pp. 743-751.

Wiarda H. (1985), Toward a Nonethnocentric Theory of Development, in: New Directions in Comparative Politics, Westview Press, Boulder.

Wiarda H. (1991), Concept and Models in Comparative Politics, in: Comparative Political Dynamics, eds. D. A. Rustow, K. A. Erickson, Harper Collins, New York.

Teksty opublikowane na łamach czasopisma "Przegląd Politologiczny" i udostępniane w formacie PDF objęte są licencją CC BY 4.0 (Creative Commons - Uznanie autorstwa). Kopiowanie i rozpowszechnianie dozwolone jest pod warunkiem uznania autorstwa.


Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.