Keywords
social council
city
role
urban governance
Poland
How to Cite
Abstract
Urban governance (UG) is a place-based network of cooperation between public and non-public actors where public authorities play a strategic role in deciding on city matters. A number of UG actors include advisory councils (ACs), characterized by a long tradition, universality, stability and objectives related to urban affairs. The article aims to identify AC roles in UG. In addition, the author hypothesizes a correlation between the number of official (statutory) and informal (not legally regulated) roles and differences between ACs in terms of the roles they play. The hypotheses were verified in qualitative research. 57 semi-structured interviews were conducted with members of the youth councils, senior citizen councils, sport councils, and councils for residents with disabilities in 16 Polish cities. The interview transcripts were uploaded to QDA Miner for encoding and analysis. It was found that all ACs, regardless of their official roles, play informal roles, and all these roles are related to UG. There is no correlation between the number of official and informal roles, which would make ACs very similar unless the mandatory character of the roles played by the council for residents with disabilities, which differs this AC from the other. The results of the study lead the author to recommend revisions to AC regulations in order to increase their participation in the UG.
Funding
The article presents results of the research performed within the project “From dialogue to deliberation. Non-public actors as a (non)present participant in the local decision-making”. The project was funded by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education under the DIALOG Programme (the decision no. 0136/DLG/2018/10).
References
Adu P. (2019), A step-by-step guide to qualitative data coding, Routledge, London–New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351044516
Alarcón P., Rico Motos C. (2019), Innovating in the Mainstream: Looking at Advisory Councils as Democratic Innovations, ECPR 2019 General Conference, Wrocław, https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/107fd205-7ac1-477e-a4cb-ad35d97f3f77.pdf.
Augsberger A., Collins M. E., Gecker W. (2017), Best Practices for Youth Engagement in Municipal Government, “National Civic Review”, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 9–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.21304
Barnett R. C. (2014), Role Theory, in: Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, ed. A. C. Michalos, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2535
Bherer L., Dufour P., Montambeault F. (2016), The participatory democracy turn: An introduction, “Journal of Civil Society”, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 225–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2016.1216383
Brugué Q., Font J., Ruiz J. (2021), The Closer, the Better? Comparing Advisory Councils at Different Government Levels, “Administration & Society”, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 844–871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720971601
Coleman S., Przybylska A., Sintomer Y. (eds.) (2016), Deliberation and Democracy: Innovative Processes and Institutions, Peter Lang D. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03727-2
Dekker K., van Kempen R. (2004), Urban governance within the Big Cities Policy, “Cities”, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 109–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2004.01.007
Denters B. (2011), Local Governance, in: The SAGE Handbook of Governance, ed. M. Bevir, SAGE, Los Angeles–London–New Delhi–Singapore–Washington DC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200964.n20
Edelenbos J. (2005), Institutional Implications of Interactive Governance: Insights from Dutch Practice, “Governance”, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 111–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2004.00268.x
Fereday J., Muir-Cochrane E. (2006), Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development, “International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 80–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
Fernández-Martínez J. L., García-Espín P., Jiménez-Sánchez M. (2020), Participatory Frustration: The Unintended Cultural Effect of Local Democratic Innovations, “Administration & Society”, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 718–748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719833628
Fobé E., Biard B., Schiffino N., Brans M. (2017), Policy advisory bodies in Belgium, in: Policy analysis in Belgium, eds. M. Brans, D. Aubin, Policy Press, Bristol. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447317258.003.0008
Fobé E., Brans M., Vancoppenolle D., Van Damme J. (2013), Institutionalized advisory systems: An analysis of member satisfaction of advice production and use across 9 strategic advisory councils in Flanders (Belgium), “Policy and Society”, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 225–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.004
Frączkiewicz-Wronka A., Kowalska-Bobko I., Sagan A., Wronka-Pośpiech M. (2019), The growing role of seniors councils in health policy-making for older people in Poland, “Health Policy”, vol. 123, no. 10, pp. 906–911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.05.016
Fung A., Wright E. O. (2011), Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance, Verso, London.
Galais C., Fernández-Martínez J. L., Font J., Smith G. (2020), Testing the input–process–output model of public participation, “European Journal of Political Research”. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12427
Harnisch S. (2012), Conceptualizing in the Minefield: Role Theory and Foreign Policy Learning: Role Theory and Foreign Policy Learning, “Foreign Policy Analysis”, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 47–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00155.x
Hendriks F. (2014), Understanding Good Urban Governance: Essentials, Shifts, and Values, “Urban Affairs Review”, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 553–576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087413511782
Jacquet V., van der Does R. (2021), Deliberation and Policy-Making: Three Ways to Think About Minipublics’ Consequences, “Administration & Society”, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 468–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720964511
Kersting N. (ed.) (2017), Urbane innovation, Springer VS, Wiesbaden. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07321-3
Le Galés P. (1998), Regulations and Governance in European Cities, “International Journal of Urban and Regional Research”, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 482–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00153
Maloutas T., Pantelidou Malouta M. (2004), The glass menagerie of urban governance and social cohesion: Concepts and stakes/concepts as stakes, “International Journal of Urban and Regional Research”, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 449–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00528.x
Pańków W. (2014), Instytucje i organizacje: Pochodzenie, powstawanie, funkcje, przekształcenia, Wydawnictwo Poltext, Warszawa.
Pawłowska A. (2022), Beyond Advising: The Representative Role of Advisory Councils (The Case of Polish Cities), “Polish Political Science Review”, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 59–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ppsr-2022-0004
Pawłowska A., Kmieciak R., Kołomycew A., Radzik-Maruszak K., Antkowiak P. (2020), Społeczne rady i komisje jako (nie)obecny uczestnik lokalnego procesu decyzyjnego, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.
Pawłowska A., Kołomycew A. (2021), Local advisory councils in deliberative decision-making. Findings from research in Polish cities, “Journal of Contemporary European Studies”, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 345–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2021.1873108
Pawłowska A., Radzik-Maruszak K. (2022), From Advice and Consultation to Local Co-governance. The Case of Advisory Councils in Polish Cities, “Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government”, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 55–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4335/20.1.55-76(2022)
Pierre J. (1999), Models of Urban Governance: The Institutional Dimension of Urban Politics, “Urban Affairs Review”, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 372–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922183988
Pierre J. (2005), Comparative Urban Governance: Uncovering Complex Causalities, “Urban Affairs Review”, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 446–462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087404273442
Pierre J. (2014), Can Urban Regimes Travel in Time and Space? Urban Regime Theory, Urban Governance Theory, and Comparative Urban Politics, “Urban Affairs Review”, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 864–889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087413518175
Saward M. (ed.) (2000), Democratic innovation: Deliberation, representation, and association, Routledge, London–New York.
Smith G. (2009), Democratic Innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609848
Sørensen E., Torfing J. (2011), Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector, “Administration & Society”, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 842–868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768
Van Damme J., Brans M., Fobé E. (2011), Balancing Expertise, Societal Input and Political Control in the Production of Policy Advice. A comparative study of education councils in Europe, “Halduskultuur – Administrative Culture”, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 126–145.
Walker A. (1999), Political participation and representation of older people in Europe, in: The Politics of Old Age in Europe, ed. A. Walker, G. Naegele, Open University Press, Buckingham [England]–Philadelphia.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Agnieszka Pawłowska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.