Abstract
This paper addresses the issue of whether a proper history of political thought should avoid any contact with substantive political philosophy, as it was vehemently claimed earlier by Cambridge historians of political thought, or not. It argues that (A) a strong political or philosophical bias might kill the credibility of a reliable history of political thought, but (B), in this genre, it is by definition impossible to avoid taking on board politico-philosophical concerns. What is more, the paper also tries to show (C) the relevance of political philosophy for the history of political thought and vice versa. In particular, it will argue along the following two lines: (a) Without a political philosophical self-positioning any reconstruction of the history of political thought remains underdetermined and therefore uninstructive, and (b) without a look at the history of political thought political philosophy remains blind, alienated, theoretically unfounded and therefore potentially even dangerous.
Methodologically, the paper aims to recapture some of the conclusions of the debates of the relationship of the two disciplines, with special attention to the French and British contexts (more particularly to the oeuvres of Rosanvallon and Skinner).
References
Aristotle (1895), Poetics, trans. Butcher, S. H., Macmillan, London.
Bellamy R., Baehr P. (1993), Carl Schmitt and the Crisis of Liberal Democracy, “European Journal of Political Research”, 23, p. 163-85.
Bloch M. (1964), The Historian’s Craft, Vintage, New York.
Bolsinger E. (2001), The Autonomy of the Political: Carl Schmitt’s and Lenin’s Political Realism, Greenwood Press, London.
Butterfield H. (1931), The Whig Interpretation of History, G. Bell, London.
Cambridge Centre for Political Thought, http://www.polthought.cam.ac.uk/, 10.02.2015.
Certeau M. (1984), The Practice o f Everyday Life, University of California, Berkeley.
Collini S., Winch D., Burrow J. (1983), That Noble Science of Politics: a Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
de Condorcet M. (1793), Sur le sens do mot révolutionnaire, “Journal d’instruction sociale” 1, June 1.
Dunn J. (1992), Democracy: The Unfinished Journey, 508 B.C. to A.D. 1993., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Floyd J., Stears M. (2011), Political Philosophy versus History? Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Horcher F. (1997), A koramodernpolitikai eszmetôrténet cambridge-i látképe (The Cambridge view of early modern political thought), in: F. Horcher, A koramodern politikai eszmetôrténet cambridge-i látképe, “Tanulmány Kiadó, Pécs”, p. 287-306.
Iggers G. G. (2011), The Intellectual Foundations o f Nineteenth-Century "Scientific” History: The German Model, in: The Oxford History o f Historical Writing, eds. S. Macintyre, J. Maiguashca,
A. Pók, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 41-58.
Iggers G. G. (1983), The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of Historical Thought from Herder to the Present, 2nd rev. edn., Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, Ct.
Lefort C. (2012), Machiavelli in the Making, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Ill.
Michelet J. (1995), Cours au Collège de France, vol. 1: 1838-1844, Gallimard, Paris.
Moyn S. (2006), Introduction. Antitotalitarianism and After, in: Rosanvallon P. : Democracy Past and future, ed. S. Moyn, Columbia University Press, New York, p. 1-28.
Quinet E. (1868), Critique de la Revolution, reprint in Quinet E., “Larevolution”, 5üled., 2 vol., Paris.
Pocock J. G. A. (2005), The Discovery of Islands: Essays in British History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Reill P. H. (1975), The German Enlightenment and the Rise of Historicism, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Richter M. (2003), A Lexicon of European Political and Legal Concepts: A Comparison of Begriffsgeschichte and the ‘Cambridge School’, “Critical Review of Social and Political Philosophy”, vol. 6, p. 91-120.
Rosanvallon P. (2002), "Ilfaut refaire le bagage d ’idées de la démocratiefrançaise” Entretien avec ce professeur au Collège de France et président de l ’association La République des idées, “Le
Monde”, November 21, http://olivier.hammam.free.fr/actualites/documents/reacs/monde.htm#REACMOND02, 10.02.2015.
Rosanvallon P. (2006), Inaugural Lecture, Collège de France, in: Rosanvallon P.: Democracy Past and Future, ed. S. Moyn, Columbia University Press, New York, p. 31-58.
Rosanvallon P. (2006b), Toward a Philosophical History of the Political, in: Rosanvallon P. : Democracy Past and Future, ed. S. Moyn, Columbia University Press, New York, p. 59-76.
Rosanvallon P. (2006c), From the Past to the Future of Democracy, in: Pierre Rosanvallon: Democracy Past and Future, ed. S. Moyn, Columbia University Press, New York, p. 189-217.
Schmitt C. (1932), Der Begriff des Politischen, revised version, Duncker und Humblot, Berlin.
Skinner Q. (1969), Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas, “History and Theory”, vol. 8, no 1, p. 3-53.
Skinner Q. (1997), Liberty before Liberalism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Skinner Q. (2002), A Third Concept of Liberty, “Proceedings of the British Academy”, vol. 117, p. 237-68.
Tuck R. (2008), Free Riding, Harvard University Press, Cambridge-London.