Abstract
The political changes which occurred in Central and Eastern Europe in the last decade of the 20th century resulted in introducing democratic systems to replace authoritarian regimes. The political transformation in the region affected also freedom of speech and leeway for the media. The transformation was of an evolutionary nature, preceded by discussions and disputes over the future form of the media. At the initial stage of the changes, strict state control was required, as the government was responsible for the success of the democratic changes. Following the overthrow of the authoritarian regimes, a need emerged for sorting out the legal and institutional basis of a free media intended to be established on the basis of state-owned media, fully controlled by the political authorities and in fact assuming a single role, namely that of a propaganda machine. Normative theories of the media have become the starting point, as a collection of ideas and postulates stating that the media’s mode of operation should facilitate socially desirable values. Discussions of the legal, institutional, functional as well as personal solutions related to the mass media in the new democracies referred to observations and agreements among researchers who came from systems with long democratic traditions. This paper revolves around the relation between the media and democracy, and argues that the theory of the media’s social responsibility and the democratic-participant theory were the major source of inspiration for the participants of the debates about the future form of the mass media in the emerging democracies. It is worth noticing that these theories represent not only slightly different opinions on the role of the media in a democracy but they also reflect the differences in understanding the essence of democracy.
References
Altschull J. H. (1984). Agents of Power: The Role of the News Media in Human Affairs, New York.
Baran S. J., Davies K. (2007), Teorie komunikowania masowego, Kraków.
Bessette (1980), Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republican Government, in: How Democratic is the Constitution, eds. R. A. Goldwin, W. A. Schambra, Washington, pp. 102–116.
Cohen J. (1989), Deliberative Democracy and Democratic Legitimacy, in: The Good Polity, eds. A. Hamlin, P. Pettit, Oxford, pp. 17–34.
Corner J. (2000), Mediated persona and political culture. Dimensions of structure and process, “European Journal of Cultural Studies”, vol. 5, pp. 386–402.
Corner J., Pels D. (eds.) (2003), Media and the Restyling of Politics: Consumerism, Celebrity, and Cynism, London.
Curran J. (1997), Rethinking the Media as a Public Sphere, in: Communication and Citizenship. Journalism and the Public Sphere, eds. P. Dahlgren, C. Sparks, London, pp. 27–57.
Dahl R. (1995), Demokracja i jej krytycy, Kraków.
Delli Carpini M., Williams B. (2001), Let us entertain you: Politics in the new media environment, in: Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, eds. W. L. Bennett, R. Entman, New York, pp. 160–191.
Dobek-Ostrowska B. (2015), Między politologią i komunikologią. Razem czy osobno? Przypadek studiów porównawczych nad relacjami polityki i mediów w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej, “Politeja”, pp. 27–49.
Dobek-Ostrowska B. (2004), Media masowe i aktorzy polityczni w świetle studiów nad komunikowaniem politycznym, Wrocław.
Dobek-Ostrowska B., Głowacki M. (eds.) (2015), Democracy and Media in Central and Eastern Europe 25 Years On, Berlin.
Enzensberger H. M. (1970), Constituents of a theory of the media, „New Left Review”, no. 64, pp. 13–36.
Franklin R. (1999), Newszak and News Media, London.
Held D. (2010), Modele demokracji, Kraków.
Juchacz P. (2002), Idea demokracji deliberatywnej, in: Indywidualizm, wspólnotowość, polityka, eds. M. N. Jakubowski, A. Szahaj, K. Arbiszewski, Toruń 2002, pp. 147–162.
Koperek J. (2001), Nowe demokracje i spór o naturę społeczeństwa obywatelskiego, Warszawa.
McQuail D. (2010), Mass Communication Theory. An Introduction, London.
Milton J. (1644), Areopagitica: A Speech o Mr. John Milton or the Liberty of Unlicensed Printing to the Parliament o England, November 24, 1644, http://pinkmonkey.com/dl/library1/milt16.pdf, 11.005.2015.
Nerone J. C. (ed.) (1995), Last Rights: Revisiting Four Thories of the Press, Urbana.
Ociepka B. (2003), Dla kogo telewizja? Model publiczny w postkomunistycznej Europie Środkowej, Wrocław.
Örnebring H., Jänsson A.-M. (2004), Tabloid Journalism and the Public Sphere: a historical perspective on tabloid journalism, “Journalism Studies”, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 283–295.
Piontek D. (2011), Komunikowanie polityczne I kultura popularna. Tabloidyzacja informacji o polityce, Poznań.
Putnam R. D. (1993), Making Democracy Work. Civic traditions in modern Italy, New Jersey.
Putnam R. D. (ed.) (2002), Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society, New York.
Sartori G. (1987), Teoria demokracji, Warszawa.
Siebert F. S., Petterson T., Schramm W. (1956), Four Theories of the Press: The Authoritarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility and Soviet Communist Concepts of What the Press Should Be and Do, Chicago.
Stanyer J. (2007), Modern Political Communication. Mediated Politics In Uncertain Times, Cambridge.
Street J. (2004), Celebrity Politicians: Popular Culture and Political Representation, “British Journal of Politics and International Relations”, vol. 6, pp. 435–452.
Strömbäck J. (2005), In Search of a Standard: four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism, “Journalism Studies”, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 331–345.
Thussu K. D. (2008), News as Entertainment. The Rise of Global Infotainment, London.
Turner G. (1999), Tabloidization, journalism and the possibility of critique, „International Journal of Cultural Studies”, vol. 2 (1), pp. 59−76.
Yun H. J. (2008), Social Responsibility Theory, in: Encyclopedia of Political Communication, eds. L. L. Kaid, C. Holtz-Bacha, London.
Zielonka J. (ed.). (2015), Media and Politics in New Democracies. Europe in a Comparative Perspective, Oxford.