Implications of the Unmanned and Autonomous Weapons’ Development for NATO Functioning – Delineating the Research Area
Journal cover Strategic Review, no. 17, year 2024
PDF

Keywords

North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
unmanned weapons
autonomous weapons
artificial intelligence (AI)
drones
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)
Lethal Autonomous Weapons System (LAWS)

How to Cite

Madej, M. (2024). Implications of the Unmanned and Autonomous Weapons’ Development for NATO Functioning – Delineating the Research Area. Strategic Review, (17), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2024.1.4

Abstract

The article deals with the impact of the development of unmanned and autonomous weapons on NATO’s functioning as a political-military alliance. Its central goal is to establish the scope and intensity of possible consequences of the development of unmanned and autonomous military technologies for NATO, identifying simultaneously key implications of that technological change for the Alliance functioning in four dimensions: political-strategic, legal, economic, and operational. That will help define and map the research field in the context of the nexus of the technology and coalition’s functioning. The article is based on the assumption that changes in the nature and forms of cooperation between NATO allies triggered by the advances in unmanned and autonomous weapons and other military systems would potentially be much more profound than in the case of the majority of similar technological breakthroughs in the past, leading to the emergence of serious challenges for allies in all four dimensions recognized in the study. The article offers arguments to support that thesis and identifies the main actual and potential implications of the development of unmanned and autonomous military technologies for NATO, stressing also the need of increasing the awareness of the problem among both security policies’ researchers as well as their practitioners (politicians, military, NATO personnel).

https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2024.1.4
PDF

References

Alcala R. T. P., Jensen E. T. (eds.) (2019), The Impact of Emerging Technologies on the Law of Armed Conflict, OUP, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190915322.001.0001

Barela S. (ed.) (2015), Legitimacy and Drones. Investigating the Legality, Morality and Efficacy of UCAVs, Ashgate, Farnham–Burlington.

Bode I., Huelss H. (2022), Autonomous Weapons Systems and International Norms, McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal–Kingston. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780228009245

Buzan B. (1987), Introduction to Strategic Studies. Military Technology & International Relations, Palgrave – Macmillan, Basingstoke.

Carey R. (1996), Alliances and Technology, in: International Security in the Modern World, (eds.) R. Carey, T. C. Salmon, Palgrave, Basingstoke. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10772-8

Dean J. (1987), Alternative Defence: Answer to NATO’s Central Problems?, “International Affairs”, Vol. 64, No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2621494

Defense Innovation Unit (2024), Replicator, https://www.diu.mil/replicator (30.06.2024).

Enemark Ch. (ed.) (2021), Ethics of Drone Strikes, University of Edinburgh Press, Edinburgh. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474483575.001.0001

Furniss E. S. (1967), Western Alliance Development and Technological Cooperation, “International Studies Quarterly”, Vol. 11, No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3013916

Galois P. (1961), The Balance of Terror: Strategy for the Nuclear Age, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

Gow J., Dijxhoorn E. (2019), Future war crimes and the military (2): autonomy and synthetic biology, in: Routledge Handbook of War, Law and Technology, (eds.) J. Gow, E. Dijxhoorn, R. Kerr, G. Verdirame, Routledge, Abington–New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315111759

Hynek N., Solovyeva A. (2022), Militarizing Artificial Intelligence. Theory, Technology and Regulation, Routledge, Abington–New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003045489

Jimenez-Bacardi A. (2022), Drone Warfare and International Humanitarian Law: the U.S., the I.C.R.C. and the contest over the global legal order, in: Drones and Global Order, (eds.) P. Lushenko, S. Bose, W. Maley, Routledge, Abington–New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003139676-8

Kreps S. E. (2016), Drones. What everybody needs to know, Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wentk/9780190235345.001.0001

Lantis J. S. (2016), Arms and Influence. U.S. technology innovations and the evolution of international security norms, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Leonard M. (2021), The Age of Unpeace: How Connectivity Causes Conflicts, Penguin Random House, London.

Leveringhaus A. (2016), Ethics and Autonomous Weapons, Palgrave-Macmillan, Basingstoke. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52361-7

Lushenko P. (2022), Blended Interpretation of drone warfare, in: Drones and Global Order, (eds.) P. Lushenko, S. Rose, W. Maley, Routledge, Abington–London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003139676

Madej M. (2012), Drone War on Terrorism – użycie bezzałogowych pojazdów latających (UAV) w walce z terroryzmem, „Polski Przegląd Dyplomatyczny”, No. 3(65).

Madej M. (2023), Weaponizacja technologii. Czynnik technologiczny w wojskowości a „horyzonty poznawcze” studiów strategicznych, in: Horyzonty Studiów Strategicznych, (eds.) P. Grzebyk et. al., Scholar, Warszawa.

McDonald J. (2019), Autonomous Agents and Command Responsibility, in: Routledge Handbook of War, Law and Technology, (eds.) J. Gow, E. Dijxhoorn, R. Kerr, G. Verdirame, Routledge, Abington–New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315111759-12

NATO (2022), Strategic Concept Adopted by Heads of State and Government at the NATO Summit in Madrid, 29.02.2022, https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/290622-strategic-concept.pdf (30.06.2024).

Nissen B. (2017), The Third Offset Strategy – Sidelining Smaller Allies?, US Army War College, Carlisle Barracks.

Pettyjohn S. (2024), Evolution Not Revolution. Drone Warfare in Russia’s 2022 Invasion of Ukraine, CNAS Report, Washington.

Sadler B. D. (2016), Fast Followers, Learning Machines and the Third Offset Strategy, “Joint Force Quarterly”, No. 83.

Salminen P. (1992), The Impact of Arms Technology on Military Doctrines, War College Helsinki, Helsinki.

Scharre P. (2018), Army of None. Autonomous weapons and the future of war, W.W. Norton & Co., London–New York.

Scharre P. (2023), Four Battlegrounds. Power in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, WW. Norton & Co., London–New York.

Schaub B., Kristensen K. S. (2015), But who’s flying the plane? Integrating UAVs into the Canadian and Danish Armed Forces, “International Journal”, Vol. 70, No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020702015572765

Schulzke M. (2017) The Morality of Drone Warfare and the Politics of Regulation, Palgrave-Macmillan, Basingstoke. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53380-7

Schwing R. (2007), Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Revolutionary Tools in War and Peace, US Army War College, Carlisle Barracks.

Singer P. (2009), Wired for War. The Robotics revolution and conflict in the 21st Century, Penguin Books, London.

Soare S. R. (2021), Innovation as Adaptation: NATO and Emerging Technologies, 11.06.2021, https://www.gmfus.org/news/innovation-adaptation-nato-and-emerging-technologies (30.06.2024).

Śledź P. (2021), Europejska Współpraca Obronna, Scholar, Warszawa.

Walt S. (1997), Why alliances endure or collapse?, “Survival”, Vol. 39, No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396339708442901

White S. (2017), Closer Than You Think: The Implications of the Third Offset Strategy for the U.S. Army, US Army War College, Carlisle Barracks.

Work R. (Dep. Secretary of Defense) (2015), The Third U.S. Offset Strategy and its Implications for Partners and Allies, https://www.defense.gov/News/Speeches/Speech/Article/606641/the-third-us-offset-strategy-and-its-implications-for-partners-and-allies/ (30.06.2024).

Yost D (2014), NATO’s Balancing Act, US Institute of Peace, Washington.