Strategiczne dylematy Sojuszu Północnoatlantyckiego

Main Article Content

Krzysztof Malinowski

Abstrakt

In the aftermath of the Iraq crisis, the North Atlantic Alliance faced its most serious predicament since the ColdWar. Its mission in Afghanistan revealed growing discrepancies between the member states. The Georgian crisis of 2008, the missile defence project and the enlargement showed a lack of coherence. NATO has split up into two or more factions. A crucial question arose as to NATO’s ability to resolve the three main strategic dilemmas which have grown more pressing since the end of the ColdWar: (1) the choice between collective defence as the key role of NATO (Art. 5) and its out-of-area role of combating the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and international terrorism; (2) the choice between the transatlantic nature of NATO and its global partnerships; (3) the choice between the concept of the global military engagement of NATO and the so called comprehensive approach involving the cooperation of NATO with other security organizations such as the UN, the EU and the OSCE in reconstructing post-conflict regions. NATO’s performance in managing these challenges will bear critically on its future. The Strategic Concept from Lisbon 2010 has helped to clarify many controversial issues within the organization. NATO has managed to mitigate the risk of developing into a multi-tier organization. Relations between the factions have relaxed although interests appear to remain as diverse as they were before.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Malinowski, K. (2011). Strategiczne dylematy Sojuszu Północnoatlantyckiego. Przegląd Strategiczny, (1), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2011.1.11
Dział
Geostrategia

Bibliografia

  1. Asmus R., et al., NATO, new allies and reassurance, Centre for European Reform, May 2010.
  2. Hillary Clinton: NATO’s Future, Atlantic Council of the United States, http://www.acus.org/event/hillary-clinton-future-nato (22.02.2010).
  3. Berlin und Paris einig über NATO-Strategie, „Süddeutsche Zeitung” 19.11.2010.
  4. Bielecki T., Rosja nadal boi się NATO, „Gazeta Wyborcza”, 8.02.2010.
  5. Brzeziński Z., An Agenda for NATO. Toward a Globar Security Web, „Foreign Affairs” September/October 2009.
  6. Busse N., Krieg gegen Russland? Die Nato diskutiert über die Lehren aus dem Georgien-Konflikt, „Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung”, 3.11.2008.
  7. Daalder I., A New Alliance for a New Century, „The RUSI Journal”, October/November 2010, vol. 155, No. 5.
  8. Daalder I., Goldgeier J., Global NATO, „Foreign Affairs”, Sept.–Oct. 2006.
  9. Day M., Russia „Simulates” Nuclear Attac on Poland, „The Daily Telegraph”, http://www.tele-graph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/poland/6480227/Russia-simulates-nuclear-attack-on-Poland.html (1.11.2009).
  10. Dempsey J., Between the European Union and NATO, Many Walls, „International Herald Tribune”, 24.11.2010.
  11. Deutscher Bundestag, 17. Wahlperiode, 71. Sitzung, Berlin, Donnerstag, den 11. November 2010.
  12. Die NATO kann nicht als Weltpolizist eingesetzt warden, http://www.dradio.de/dlf/sendungen/inte-rview_dlf/945089/ (3.04.2009).
  13. Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between NATO and the Russian Federation, signed in Paris, France, 27 May 1997, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/offi-cial_texts_25468.htm.
  14. Hemicker L., Denkan-stöße für eine neue NATO-Strategie: Rasmussen und Guttenberg zur Zukunft des Bündnisses, Munich Security Conference 7.02.2010.
  15. Jonson P., The debate about Article 5 and its credibility. What is all about? „Research Paper”, Research Division – NATO Defense College, Rome, No. 58, May 2010.
  16. Katsioulis Chr., Die neue NATO-Strategie. Komromiss auf Zeit, „Internationale Po-litikananlyse”, November 2010, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
  17. Laborie Iglesias M. A., NATO–EU Cooperation in the Atlantic Alliance’s Future Strategic Concept (ARI), Real Instituto Elcano, Area: Security and Defence, ARI 25/2010, 12.04.2010.
  18. Lisbon Summit Declaration. Issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Lisbon on 20 November 2010, Press Release Communiqué de presse, Press release PR/CP(2010)0155.
  19. Mc Namara S., NATO Summit 2010: Time to Turn Words Into Action, „Backgrounder”. Published by The Heritage Foundation, No. 2498, December 10, 2010.
  20. Mind the Gap. Healing the NATO rift over US tactical nuclear weapons in Europe, British American Security Information Council, January 2010.
  21. NATO 2020: Assured Security; Dynamic Engagement. Analysis and Recommendations of the Group of Experts on a New Strategic Concept for NATO, 17 May 2010.
  22. Niech NATO działa z automatu, „Gazeta Wyborcza” z 27.10.2010.
  23. Noetzel T., Schreer B., Does a multi-tier NATO matter? The Atlantic alliance and the process of strategic change, “International Affairs” 2009, vol. 85, No. 2.
  24. Partnerships with non-NATO countries, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_51103.htm.
  25. Podvig P., NATO and the future of missile defence in Europe, „Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists”, 28 October 2010.
  26. Poland’s Priorities in the Debate on a New Strategic Concept for NATO, „PISM Strategic Files”, No. 12, April 2010.
  27. Press Briefing by U.S. Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daalder and Deputy National Security Advi-sor for Strategic Communicatons Ben Rhodes, ww.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/11/19.
  28. Regierungserklärung von Angela Merkel zum Nato-Gipfel, http://www.bundesregierung.de/Webs/Breg/DE/Service/Suche/Volltext/volltext.html?search=globale%20Herausforderungen%20in%20deutschland&sortString=date&do=search&pc=1&sp=20, 26.03.2009.
  29. Rotfeld A. D., W kierunku nowej koncepcji strategicznej NATO: Przyszłe zadania i wyzwania Sojuszu a rola partnerów, wykład w trakcie sympozjum w Oberammergau, 20–21.02.2010 r., w: Państwa członkowskie NATO wobec nowej koncepcji strategicznej Sojuszu. Przegląd stanowisk, red. B. Górka-Winter, M. Madej, Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych, Warszawa, marzec 2010.
  30. Schreer B., Challenges and prospects for NATO „Complex Operations”, w: Complex Operations: NATO at war and on the margins of war, red. Chr. M. Schnaubelt, NATO Defense College „NDC Forum Papers Series”, July 2010.
  31. Strategic Concept For the Defence and Security of The members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, Adopted by Heades of State and Government in Lisbon. „Active Engagement, Modern Defence”.
  32. Taggart R., Gates warns of two-tier NATO, http://www.e-ir.info/?p=319 (7.02.2008).
  33. Towards a new Grand Bargain with Russia. Testimony of Ambassador Wolfgang Ischinger before United States Congress, House of Representatives, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Washington, DC, March 17, 2010.
  34. US embassy cables: Poland sceptical over Baltic Defence plan, „Guardian” z 6.12.2010.
  35. US Fact Sheet na stronie: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_pressoffice/FACT-SHEET--US-Missile-Defense-Policy-A-Phased-Adaptive-Approach-for-Missile-Defense-in-Europe/.
  36. Westerwelle brüstet sich mit Abrüstungsvision, „Der Spiegel”, 19.11.2010.