Poland in the European Union – Reaching Beyond the Liberal Perspective of Analysis

Main Article Content

Jacek Więcławski

Abstrakt

The article refers to Polish membership in the European Union and the liberal perspective of its analysis. The paper discusses the shortages of the liberal approach. The article accepts the liberal thesis regarding the opportunities that the accession to the EU opens up for Polish development. It notes the significance of the European mechanisms of regional cooperation. Nevertheless, the paper emphasises that the liberal perspective ignores the inequalities of power in the European Union and misses some serious tendencies, both at the level of the community and in the domestic politics, that impede the state’s development. Thus, the article refers to the limited competitiveness of the Polish economy and the state’s difficulties with the identification of its interests in the dynamic and variable international environment. It warns against the marginalization of Poland as “semi-peripheral” member of the European Union. The main conclusion of the paper is that the case of Polish membership in the EU is too complicated to close it in the liberal frameworks. The liberal perspective needs a realist correction. It is extremely important in the context of the challenges that Poland faces together with the crisis of the European integration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Więcławski, J. (2016). Poland in the European Union – Reaching Beyond the Liberal Perspective of Analysis. Przegląd Strategiczny, (9), 127-139. https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2016.1.10
Dział
Bezpieczeństwo w wymiarze globalnym, regionalnym i wewnętrznym

Bibliografia

  1. Baun M. (2005), Germany and Central Europe: Hegemony Re-examined, “German Politics”, Vol. 14, No. 3.
  2. Buckley N. (2015), Structural reforms are vitalfor Poland’s success, “Financial Times”, 04.09.2015.
  3. Balcerowicz L. (2015), Balcerowicz: bez reform Polska przestanie doganiać kraje Zachodu, “Wprost”, 16.09.2015.
  4. Balcerowicz L., Rzońca A., et al. (2013), Economic growth in the European Union, Brussels.
  5. Central Statistical Office (2014), Poland in the European Union 2004-2014, Warsaw.
  6. Davies N. (2001), Heart of Europe. The Past in Poland’s Present, Oxford.
  7. Fiszer J. (2007), Polityczno-kulturowe i gospodarcze aspekty członkostwa Polski w Unii Europejskiej - szanse i zagrożenia, in: Polska. Unia Europejska. Świat, (ed.) J. Fiszer, Warszawa.
  8. Fiszer J. (2013), System euroatlantycki przed i po zakończeniu zimnej wojny. Istota, cele i zadania oraz rola w budowie nowego ładu globalnego, Warszawa.
  9. Gilbert M. (2003), Surpassing Realism. The Politics of European Integration since 1945, Lanham-Oxford.
  10. Hofhansel C. (2005), Multilateralism, German Foreign Policy and Central Europe, London-New York.
  11. Jokela J. (2013), Towards a deeper EMU. An assessment of political divisions within the EU, The Finnish Institute of International Affairs, “Briefing Paper”, No. 140.
  12. Kiepuszewski R. (2015), Politics derail Poland’s quest fo r the euro, “Deutsche Welle”, 26.08.2015, http://www.dw.com/en/politics-derail-polands-quest-for-the-euro/a-18670762 (09.10.2015).
  13. Lane D. (2013), Postsocialist states in the system of global capitalism: a comparative perspective, in: Development and Semi-periphery. Post-neoliberal Trajectories in South America and CentralEastern Europe, (eds.) R. Boschi, C. H. Santana, London-New York.
  14. Leszczynski A. (2011), I t ’s a bad time to be young and Polish, “The Guardian”, 31.05.2011.
  15. Luhn A. (2014), Russia’s turbulent ties in Europe - the Guardian briefing, “The Guardian”, 17.10.2014.
  16. Mayer T. (2012), Europe’s Unfinished Currency: The Political Economics of the Euro, London-New York.
  17. Miskimmon A. (2007), Germany and the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union. Between Europeanisation and National Adaptation, Houndmills-Basingstoke-Hampshire-New York.
  18. Morgenthau H. J. (1952), Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States, “The American Political Science Review”, Vol. 46, No. 4.
  19. Morgenthau H. J. (1948), Politics Among Nations. The Struggle fo r Power and Peace, New York.
  20. Morgenthau H. J. (1947), Scientific Man vs. Power Politics, London.
  21. Niklewicz K. (2010), Ile unijnej pomocy wraca do krajów Unii Europejskiej?, “Gazeta Wyborcza”, 5.05.2010.
  22. O’Brennan J. (2006), The Eastern Enlargement of the European Union, Abingdon-New York.
  23. Oldberg I. (2007), Russia's Great Power Ambitions and Policy Under Putin, in: Russia: Re-Emerging Great Power, (ed.) R. E. Kanet, Houndmills-Basingstoke-Hampshire-New York.
  24. Prażmowska A. (2010), Poland. A Modern History, London-New York.
  25. Russett B. (2010), Liberalism, in: International Relations Theories. Discipline and Diversity, (eds.) T. Dunne, M. Kurki, S. Smith, Oxford.
  26. Smallbone D., Welter F. (2009), Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development in Post-Socialist Economies, Abingdon-New York: Routledge.
  27. Socha R. (2011), Grantoza, “Polityka”, 01.12.2011.
  28. Sroczyński G. (2015), Co wymyśli chodnik, czyli polska atrapa rozwoju, “Gazeta Wyborcza”, 30.05.2015.
  29. Steindl A. (2013), Poland to get nearly EUR 106 bln from 2014-2020 EU budget pool - expected impact on the Polish economy, chances and challenges, Ministry of Treasury ofthe Republic of Poland, “Economic News”, 12.03.2013, http://msp.gov.pl/en/polish-economy/economic-news/4015,dok.html (27.01.2016).
  30. Taliaferro J. W., Lobell S. E., Ripsman N. M. (2009), Introduction: Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy, in: Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy, (eds.) S. E. Lobell, N. M. Ripsman, J. W. Taliaferro, Cambridge.
  31. Taylor P. (2008), The End of European Integration. Anti-Europeanism Examined, Abingdon-New York.
  32. Timmins G. (2007), German-Russian Bilateral Relations and the EU Policy on Russia: Reconciling the Two-Level Game?, in: Russia and Europe in the Twenty-First Century: An Uneasy Partnership, (eds.) J. Gower, G. Timmins, London-New York.
  33. Troebst S., Daftary F. (2003), Radical Ethnic Movements in Contemporary Europe, Oxford-New York.
  34. Wallerstein I. (1996), The inter-state structure of the modern world-system, in: International theory: positivism and beyond, (eds.) S. Smith, K. Booth, M. Zalewski, New York.
  35. Więcławski J. (2015a), Considering the Rapprochement of Realism and Liberalism in Contemporary International Relations - Some Conclusions in the Context of the Russian Foreign Policy, “Scottish Journal of Arts, Social Sciences and Scientific Studies”, Vol. 25, No. 2.
  36. Więcławski J. (2015b), The Gap between the Liberal Rhetoric and the Socio-Political Reality of Contemporary International Relations - the Example of East-Central Europe, “Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne”, No. 2. (DOI 10.14746/ssp.2015.2.8).
  37. Wojciechowski S. (2013), Stan i poczucie bezpieczeństwa w Polsce. Pentagonalny model bezpieczeństwa, in: Kluczowe determinanty bezpieczeństwa Polski na początku XXI wieku, (red.) S. Wojciechowski, A. Wejkszner, Warszawa.
  38. Wójcik A. (2009), Small and medium-sized enterprises, in: 5 years of Poland in the European Union, (eds.) M. Kałużyńska, K. Smyk, J. Wiśniewski, Warsaw.
  39. Zięba R. (2011), Uwarunkowania polityki zagranicznej Polski na początku drugiej dekady XXI wieku, “Stosunki Międzynarodowe - International Relations”, Vol. 43, No. 1-2.