Dbałość o moralną kondycję społeczeństwa versus wolność mediów – o tym, jak Turcja przekracza kolejne granice

Main Article Content

Magdalena Szkudlarek

Abstrakt

The aim of this article is to examine reasons and circumstances of Turkish state’s increasing interference in freedom of mass media and to present tools that are being used in this process and its consequences. However, on the contrary to majority of this type of analysis – the subject of examination is not political censorship referring to Kurdish and Armenian cases but limitation of these contents which are not consistent with ethos of Muslim society. Method that was used in order to ensure a comprehensive presentation of this subject is legal analysis of the statements issued by Turkish Radio and Television Supreme Council (RTÜK) which is entitled to fine the broadcaster or even to demand to stop broadcasting. In the second part of the analysis there are discussed examples of TV programs like cartoons The Simpsons or Winnie the Pooh which regardless of its “indecency” became an object of interest of the RTÜK.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Szkudlarek, M. (1). Dbałość o moralną kondycję społeczeństwa versus wolność mediów – o tym, jak Turcja przekracza kolejne granice. Refleksje. Pismo Naukowe studentów I doktorantów WNPiD UAM, (8). Pobrano z https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/r/article/view/8812
Dział
Artykuły

Bibliografia

  1. 08.2009 tarih ve 2009/43 sayılı Üst Kurul Toplantısı Kararları, Karar No 8, http://www.rtuk.org.tr/sayfalar/IcerikGoster.aspx?icerik_id=791d92c4-1de3-4431 -ba23-df7eca92d371.
  2. 11.2011 tarih ve 2011/64 sayılı Üst Kurul Toplantısı Kararları, Karar No 37, http://www.rtuk.org.tr/sayfalar/IcerikGoster.aspx?icerik_id=443386f9-948f-4658- a2e1-1dd945ac051f.
  3. 11.2012 tarih ve 2012 65 sayılı Üst Kurulu Toplantısı Kararları, Karar No 8, http://www.rtuk.org.tr/sayfalar/IcerikGoster.aspx?icerik_id=2e320aa1-52d7-4e59- 98f1-0f41f3ab91a4.
  4. World press freedom index: Dashed hopes after spring, http://en.rsf.org/ press-freedom-index-2013,1054.html.
  5. 02.2013 tarih ve 2013 10 sayılı Üst Kurulu Toplantısı Kararları, Karar No 54, http://www.rtuk.org.tr/sayfalar/IcerikGoster.aspx?icerik_id=084c15fe-d6f9¬-4ed3-b3fe-5ff0c2192682.
  6. 04.2013 tarih ve 2013/23 sayılı Üst Kurul Toplantısı Kararları, Karar No 2, http://www.rtuk.org.tr/sayfalar/IcerikGoster.aspx?icerik_id=bd78a2bb-23f0-4110- 9cb1-9144a2f40149.
  7. Arınç: Dizilerdeki başrol ouyuncuları içki reklamı yapıyor!, http://www.zaman. com.tr/politika_arinc-dizilerdeki-basrol-oyunculari-icki-reklami-yapiyor_2093146. html.
  8. Declaration on freedom of expression and information adopted by the Commit¬tee of Ministers on 29 April 1982 at its 70th ession, Council of Europe, http://www. coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/media/doc/cm/dec(1982)freedomexpr_EN.asp.
  9. Handyside vs. The United Kingdom, Application no. 5493/72, Judg¬ment: 07.12.1976, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001- 57499#{“itemid”:[“001-57499”]}.
  10. Konwencja o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności, Rzym 4.11.1950 r., Dziennik Ustaw 1993, nr 61, poz. 284.
  11. Radyo ve televizyon kuruluş ve yayın hizmetleri hakkında kanun No: 6112, Resmî Gazete 3.03.2011 r.
  12. RTÜK ceza raporu, http://www.medyatekzip.com/denial_report.php?type=8&-first_Day=01&first_Month=01&first_Year=2012&last_Day=31&last_Month=12&¬ last_Year=2013.
  13. RTÜK, „ahlak kurulu” oldu, http://birbak.mynet.com/detay/guncel/rtuk-ahlak¬-kurulu-oldu/10066.
  14. RTÜK, 2012’de ceza yağdırdı, http://cadde.milliyet.com.tr/2013/01/08/Yaz-arDetay/1652492/RTUK__2012_DE_CEZA_YAGDIRDI.
  15. RTÜK’ten Winnie the Pooh’a ceza!, http://www.cnnturk.com/2011/turki-ye/08/09/rtukten.winnie.the.pooha.ceza/625560.0/index.html.
  16. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasası No: 2709, Resmî Gazete, 9.11.1982 r.
  17. Tütün Ürünlerinin Zararlarının Önlenmesi ve Kontrolü Hakkında Kanun, Resmî Gazete 26.11.1996.
  18. Wypowiedź R.T. Erdoğana z 1997 r., http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2drs¬dVS0r0A.