Słowa kluczowe
polityka sztucznej inteligencji
polityzacja
Unia Europejska
zarządzanie sztuczną inteligencją
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
W artykule zbadano polityzację sztucznej inteligencji (AI) w UE poprzez wzajemne oddziaływanie dynamiki wewnętrznej i wpływów zewnętrznych (USA i Chin). Badanie ma na celu identyfikację wczesnych oznak polityzacji unijnej debaty na temat AI i porównanie modelu polityki UE w zakresie AI z modelami rozwijanymi w USA i Chinach. Hipoteza zakłada, że debata publiczna w UE na temat AI ulega polityzacji, kształtowana zarówno przez czynniki wewnętrzne, jak i reakcje na zewnętrzne modele polityki AI. W badaniu wykorzystano porównawczą analizę polityki i analizę treści. Wyniki wskazują na rosnącą wagę AI w dyskursie publicznym, o czym świadczy zwiększone zainteresowanie mediów i zaangażowanie szerokiego grona podmiotów. Jednakże znaczna polaryzacja w tej kwestii nie jest widoczna. W badaniu podkreślono także strategiczną reakcję UE na zewnętrzne modele polityki AI. UE kładzie nacisk na równowagę między innowacjami, suwerennością cyfrową oraz ochroną wartości demokratycznych i praw podstawowych.
Bibliografia
Algorithm Watch (2023), EU legislators must close dangerous loophole in AI Act, Statement, 7.09.2023, https://algorithmwatch.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/20230728_AI-Act_Article-6-NGO-statement-draft_-AlgorithmWatch.pdf.
Allison G., Schmidt E. (2020), Is China Beating the US to AI Supremacy?, Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/AISupremacy.pdf.
Bertuzzi L. (2022), The US unofficial position on upcoming EU Artificial Intelligence rules, Euractiv, 24.10.2022, https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/the-us-unofficial-position-on-upcoming-eu-artificial-intelligence-rules/.
Blumenthal R. (2023), Blumenthal & Hawley announce bipartisan framework on artificial intelligence legislation, Richard Blumenthal’s website, 8.09.2023, https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/blumenthal-and-hawley-announce-bipartisan-framework-on-artificial-intelligence-legislation.
Bradford A. (2023), Digital empires: The global battle to regulate technology, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197649268.001.0001
Brennen J. S., Howard P. N., Nielsen R. K. (2018), An industry-led debate: How UK media cover artificial intelligence, RISJ Fact-Sheet.
Caunes K. (ed.) (2023), Artificial Intelligence and Democratic Values Index 2022, Center for AI and Digital Policy, Washington DC.
Cave S., Dihal K. (2019), Hopes and fears for intelligent machines in fiction and reality, “Nature machine intelligence”, no. 1(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0020-9
Chubb J., Reed D., Cowling P. (2022), Expert views about missing AI narratives: is there an AI story crisis?, “AI & society”, doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01548-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01548-2
Council of the European Union (2023), ChatGPT in the Public Sector – overhyped or overlooked?, 24.04.2023, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/63818/art-paper-chatgpt-in-the-public-sector-overhyped-or-overlooked-24-april-2023_ext.pdf.
De Bruycker I. (2017), Politicization and the public interest: When do the elites in Brussels address public interests in EU policy debates?, “European Union Politics”, no. 18(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116517715525
Decision 2022/2481. Decision (EU) 2022/2481 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 establishing the Digital Decade Policy Programme 2030 (Text with EEA relevance).
De Wilde P. (2011), No polity for old politics? A framework for analyzing the politicization of European integration, “Journal of European integration”, no. 33(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2010.546849
De Wilde P., Leupold A., Schmidtke H. (2016), Introduction: The differentiated politicisation of European governance, “West European Politics”, no. 39(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1081505
EDRI (2023), EU Trilogues: The AI Act must protect people’s rights, Statement, 12.07.2023, https://edri.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Civil-society-AI-Act-trilogues-statement.pdf.
European Commission (2018), Artificial Intelligence for Europe, COM/2018/237 final.
European Commission (2020), White Paper on Artificial Intelligence – A European approach to excellence and trust, COM (2020) 65 final.
European Commission (2021a), Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts, COM(2021) 206 final.
European Commission (2021b), European citizens’ knowledge and attitudes towards science and technology: report, Directorate-General for Communication.
European Parliament (2023), Artificial Intelligence Act: deal on comprehensive rules for trustworthy AI, 9.12.2023, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20231206IPR15699/artificial-intelligence-act-deal-on-comprehensive-rules-for-trustworthy-ai.
Filgueiras F. (2022), Artificial intelligence policy regimes: comparing politics and policy to national strategies for artificial intelligence, “Global Perspectives”, no. 3(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2022.32362
Glukhov V. (2023), Responsible AI: Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, OpenAI [LinkedIn post], LinkedIn, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/responsible-ai-microsoft-alphabet-meta-openai-vacslav-glukhov/.
Góra M. (2019), Legitymizacja i kontestacja polityki zagranicznej Unii Europejskiej na przykładzie polityki rozszerzenia i Europejskiej Polityki Sąsiedztwa, Kraków.
Guillou C., Piquard A. (2023), French far-right leader seeks to take advantage of AI debate, “Le Monde”, 2.10.2023, https://www.lemonde.fr/en/politics/article/2023/10/02/french-far-right-leader-tries-to-take-advantage-of-ai-debate_6143014_5.html.
Hackenesch C., Bergmann J., Orbie J. (2021), Development policy under fire? The politicization of European external relations, “JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies”, no. 59(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13145
Heidebrecht S. (2023), From Market Liberalism to Public Intervention: Digital Sovereignty and Changing European Union Digital Single Market Governance, “JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies”, no. 62(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13488
Jaakkola M. (2023), Reporting on artificial intelligence: a handbook for journalism educators, UNESCO, Paris.
Jones B., Jones R., Luger E. (2022), AI ‘Everywhere and Nowhere’: Addressing the AI Intelligibility Problem in Public Service Journalism, “Digital Journalism”, no. 10(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2145328
Jungherr A. (2023), Artificial intelligence and democracy: A conceptual framework, “Social media+ society”, no. 9(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231186353
Kalpokas I., Kalpokienė J. (eds.) (2023), Intelligent and Autonomous: Transforming Values in the Face of Technology, Leiden. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004547261
Kriesi H., Tresch A., Jochum M. (2007), Going public in the European Union: Action repertoires of Western European collective political actors, “Comparative Political Studies”, no. 40(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005285753
MacCarthy M. (2023), The US and its allies should engage with China on AI law and policy, The Brookings Institution, 19.10.2023, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-us-and-its-allies-should-engage-with-china-on-ai-law-and-policy/.
Maricut-Akbik A. (2019), EU politicization beyond the Euro crisis: immigration crises and the politicization of free movement of people, “Comparative European Politics”, no. 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-018-0113-6
Mazzucato M., Schaake M., Krier S., Entsminger J. (2022), Governing artificial intelligence in the public interest, UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, Working Paper Series (IIPP WP 2020-12), https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/wp2022-12.
Moldicz C. (2022), China, the USA and Technological Supremacy in Europe, London–New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003128625
Nguyen D., Hekman E. (2022), The news framing of artificial intelligence: a critical exploration of how media discourses make sense of automation, “AI & SOCIETY”, no. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01511-1
Poseliuzhna I. (2023), AI talent competition: Challenges to the United States’ technological superiority, in: Intelligent and Autonomous: Transforming Values in the Face of Technology, ed. by I. Kalpokas, J. Kalpokienė, Leiden. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004547261_005
Roe J., Perkins M. (2023), ‘What they’re not telling you about ChatGPT’: exploring the discourse of AI in UK news media headlines, “Humanities and Social Sciences Communications”, no. 10(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02282-w
Roff H. M. (2019), The frame problem: The AI “arms race” isn’t one, “Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists”, no. 75(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2019.1604836
Rotenberg M. (2023), Everything. Everywhere. All at Once: AI Policy When Congress Returns, “Communications of the ACM”, 24.08.2023, https://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/275742-everything-everywhere-all-at-once-ai-policy-when-congress-returns/fulltext#_ednref8.
Sayler K. M. (2020), Artificial intelligence and national security, R45178, U.S. Congressional Research Service, 26.08.2020, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45178/8.
Sheehan M. (2023), China’s AI regulations and how they get made, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 10.07.2023, https://carnegieendowment.org/files/202307-Sheehan_Chinese%20AI%20gov.pdf.
Schmitter P. C. (1969), Three neo-functional hypotheses about international integration, “International Organization”, no. 23(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300025601
Schyns C. (2023), The lobbying ghost in the machine, Corporate Europe Observatory, https://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/2023-03/The%20Lobbying%20Ghost%20in%20the%20Machine.pdf.
Schyns C., Vranken B. (2023), Big Tech’s attempt to water down the EU AI act revealed, EUobserver, 23.02.2023, https://euobserver.com/opinion/156751.
Stevens F., De Bruycker I. (2020), Influence, affluence and media salience: Economic resources and lobbying influence in the European Union, “European Union Politics”, no. 21(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116520944572
Stierle S. (2023), KI-Regulierung: Verspäteter Zoff in der Bundesregierung, „Tagesspiegel Background“, 17.01.2023, https://background.tagesspiegel.de/digitalisierung/ki-regulierung-verspaeteter-zoff-in-der-bundesregierung.
The White House (2023a), Fact sheet: Biden-Harris Administration secures voluntary commitments from leading artificial intelligence companies to manage the risks posed by AI, 21.07.2023, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/07/21/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-secures-voluntary-commitments-from-leading-artificial-intelligence-companies-to-manage-the-risks-posed-by-ai/.
The White House (2023b), Fact sheet: President Biden issues executive order on safe, secure, and trustworthy artificial intelligence, 30.10.2023, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/10/30/fact-sheet-president-biden-issues-executive-order-on-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence/.
Ulnicane I. (2022), Artificial Intelligence in the European Union: Policy, ethics and regulation, in: The Routledge handbook of European integrations, ed. by T. Hoerber, G. Weber, I. Cabras, Abingdon–New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429262081-19
United Nations Secretary-General (2023), Press remarks launching high-level advisory body on artificial intelligence, [Speech transcript], 26.10.2023, United Nations, https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/sgs_remarks_announcing_high-level_advisory_body_artificial_intelligence_26_october_2023.pdf.
von Essen L., Ossewaarde M. (2023), Artificial intelligence and European identity: the European Commission’s struggle for reconciliation, “European Politics and Society”, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2023.2244385
Welch N., Schneider J. (2023), China’s censors are afraid of what chatbots might say, “Foreign Policy”, 3.03.2023, https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/03/03/china-censors-chatbots-artificial-intelligence/.
Wodecki B. (2023), Top European Companies: ‘Serious Concerns’ About EU AI Act, 3.07.2023, AI Business, https://aibusiness.com/nlp/top-european-companies-serious-concerns-about-eu- ai-act.
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Ilona Poseliuzhna
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.