Jean Monnet’s methods of integrating Europeans leading to a United States of Europe
PDF (Język Polski)

Keywords

Jean Monnet
European integration
United States of Europe
delegated sovereignty
subsidiarity
integration methods
discourse methods

How to Cite

Bokajło, W. (2023). Jean Monnet’s methods of integrating Europeans leading to a United States of Europe. Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej, (17), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.14746/rie.2023.17.1

Abstract

The first aim of the article is to present the Jean Monnet’s concept of the people’s integration, in historical development, particularly European, according to his credo: “We are not forming coalitions between States, but union among people”. In his conception the ultimate goal of each stage of integration is Community is a way of uniting peoples; each form of integration required appropriate institutions: “institutions are more important than men”. He defined the individual stages of European integration: from the European Community, a undefined Fédération européenne and finally the United States of Europe (les Etats-Unis d’Europe): “The union of European peoples in the United States of Europe is the way to raise their standard of living and preserve peace”. Monnet understood the federalism as both a long way leading to   a goal and an ultimate goal, which will not be achieved immediately as one whole: it will built gradually by concrete achievements that create de facto solidarity. For Monnet the concept of solidarity is related to the concepts of subsidiarity and sovereignty. The effectiveness of  a transnational/supranational organization (international system), is provided by ‘international Authority’ which became e.g. a High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community. To this kind of Authority is delegating sovereignty: a part of the national sovereignty of the member states is delegated to an independent supranational body – there „power of decision” have a merger of sovereignty or pooling sovereignty.the second aim of the article is to present the methods of implementing subsequent stages of European integration – from European Community, Federation of Europe to the United States of Europe. These methods were based on the his “institutionalism”, the ideas Christhian philosophy of H.-F. Amiel and Descartes’ rationalism, especially his method of discourse. This kind of rationalism was reinforced by philosophy of common sense. A method of reaching “truth” through discourse reinforced by philosophy of common sense became the theoretical basis of method “concerted action” and an implementation of “partial” elements of the federalism process. According to his credo he used the same method: “getting people to sit round the table together” both when developing plans with his collaborators and in political or economic negotiations. The negotiation partners were not only politicians, but also economists and trade union representatives. After resigning from the position of chairman of High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community Monnet implemented his concept of the Fédération euro- péenne through the Action Committee for the United States of Europe.

https://doi.org/10.14746/rie.2023.17.1
PDF (Język Polski)

References

Biskup P. (2012), Stany Zjednoczone Europy Winstona Churchilla, tłumaczenie, “Przegląd Europejski”, nr 2.

Bokajło W. (2023), Ekonomiczno-polityczne uwarunkowania projektów integracji europejskiej przed układem o EWWiS, „Rocznik Europeistyczny”, nr 9.

Bossuat G. (1999), Conclusion générale, w: Jean Monnet, l’Europe et les chemins de la Paix, red. G. Bossuat, W. Wilkens, Publications de la Sorbonne, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.psorbonne.47178

Churchill W. S. (1930), Stany Zjednoczone Europy, „The Saturday Evening Post”, 15.02.1930. De Gaulle Ch. (1970), Discours et messages, t. II, Paris.

Draghi M. (2017), The Monnet method: its relevance for Europe then and now, https://www.ecb. europa.eu/press/key/date/2017/html/ecb.sp170504.en.html, 4.05.2017.

EBC (2023), https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2017/html/ecb.sp170504.en.html,10.10.2023.

Jean Monnet (2016), European Union Politics Resource Centre, Oxford University Press, https://global.oup.com/uk/orc/politics/eueupolitics/resources/biographies/monnet/ (dostęp: 10.10.2023).

Kilar R. (2005), Międzynarodówka Partii Chrześcijańsko-demokratycznych i Ludowych, w: Organizacje międzynarodowe partii politycznych, red. A. Zięba, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.

Kitzinger J. (1967), The European Common Market and Community, London.

Lücker H. A., Hahn K. J (1987), Christliche Demokraten bauen Europa, Europa Union Verlag, Bonn. Madeja A. (2011), Europejska Wspólnota Węgla i Stali a suwerenność państwa członkowskiego: aspekt instytucjonalno-doktrynalny, „Zeszyty Prawnicze”, nr 11/4.

Madeja A. (2012), Koncepcja integracji wspólnotowej Jean Monneta (1950–1955), „Roczniki Humanistyczne”, t. LX, z. 2, Toruń.

Minefield D. A. (2006), Delegating Divisible Sovereignty: Sweeping, Lake University of California, San Diego, 11 October 2006, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/afc5/e680ecc812f651b620ac-2590f1d4d540ef68.pdf, 10.10.2023.

Monnet J. (1978), Memoirs, Introduction by George W. Ball, Translated from the French by Richard Mayne, Doubleday & Company, INC. Garden City, First Edition in the United States of America, New York.

Monnet J. (2015), Wspomnienia, w przekładzie Waldemara Kuczyńskiego, wyd. Poltext, Warszawa. Okoń W. (2001), Nowy słownik pedagogiczny, Wydawnictwo Akademickie „Żak”, Warszawa.

Pius IX (1931), encyklika Quadragesimo Anno, 15.05.1931, „Opoka” http://www.opoka.org.pl/biblioteka/W/WP/pius_xi/encyklikiquadragesimo_anno_15051931.html, 10.10.2023.

Reflection paper by Monnet, Jean, Les Portes (1965), Archives de la Fondation Jean Monnet pour l’Europe, August.

Weber M. (1951), Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, 2. vermehrte Auflage, hrg. von Johannes Winckelmann.

Veblen Th. (1904), The Theory of Business Enterprise, Transaction Books, New Brunswick–New Jersey.

Veblen Th. (1990), The Place of Science in Modern Civilization and Other Essays, Transaction, New Brunswick–London.