The Trimarium Identity Dilemma: A Constructivist Perspective on the Social Foundations of Regional Cohesion
Journal cover Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej, no. 19, year 2025
PDF

Keywords

Three Seas Initiative
regional identity
constructivism
international relations
Central and Eastern Europe

How to Cite

Lorek, A. M. (2025). The Trimarium Identity Dilemma: A Constructivist Perspective on the Social Foundations of Regional Cohesion. Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej, (19), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.14746/rie.2025.19.23

Abstract

The study investigates whether the success of the Three Seas Initiative (3SI) depends on the formation of a shared regional identity. Anchored in the constructivist paradigm of international relations, it addresses the overlooked theoretical dimension of identity-building within 3SI. Drawing on summit declarations, official reports and constructivist literature, the analysis reveals a discrepancy between the Initiative’s economic ambitions and the absence of overt identity-forming narratives. Despite growing institutionalisation and practical cooperation tools – such as investment and innovation funds – there is limited rhetorical or symbolic articulation of collective belonging. The findings suggest that fostering a sense of “we” could enhance trust, cohesion, and external visibility, strengthening both internal solidarity and attractiveness for investors. The article argues that identity, constructed through social interaction and shared norms, is not a by-product but a precondition of sustainable regionalism. It proposes pathways for identity formation rooted in inclusive dialogue, historical reconciliation and alignment with European values. This perspective positions 3SI not as an alternative, but as a regional pillar of a cohesive Europe.

https://doi.org/10.14746/rie.2025.19.23
PDF

References

Joint Declaration of the Eighth Summit of the Three Seas Initiative (2023), https://3si.politic.edu.pl/joint-declaration-of-the-eighth-summit-of-the-three-seas-initiative-bucharest-6-7-september-2023/, 15.04.2025.

Joint Declaration of the Third Summit of the Three Seas Initiative (2018), https://3si.politic.edu.pl/joint-declaration-of-the-third-summit-of-the-three-seas-initiative-bucharest-17-18-september-2018/, 15.04.2025.

Joint Declaration of the Seventh Summit of the Three Seas Initiative (2022), https://3si.politic.edu.pl/wspolna-deklaracja-siodmego-szczytu-inicjatywy-trojmorza-ryga-20-21-czerwca-2022-r/, 15.04.2025.

Joint Declaration of the Sixth Summit of the Three Seas Initiative (2021), https://3si.politic.edu.pl/joint-declaration-of-the-sixth-summit-of-the-three-seas-initiative-sofia-8-9-july-2021/, 15.04.2025.

The Joint Statement on the Three Seas Initiative (the Dubrovnik Statement) (2016), https://3si.politic.edu.pl/the-joint-statement-on-the-three-seas-initiative-the-dubrovnik-statement-25-august-2016/, 15.04.2025.

The Second Summit of the Three Seas Initiative Joint Declaration (2017), https://3si.politic.edu.pl/the-second-summit-of-the-three-seas-initiative-joint-declaration-warsaw-6-7-june-2017/, 15.04.2025.

The Status Report 2024, https://www.projects.3seas.eu, 4.03.2025.

Bauman Z. (2003), O tarapatach tożsamości w ciasnym świecie, “Er(r)go. Teoria – Literatura – Kultura”, no. 6.

Castells O. M. (2008), Siła tożsamości, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw.

d’Orville H. (2022), The Warsaw-Bucharest axis and Romania’ s place in the Three Seas Initiative? Polish-Romanian Leadership in the Three Seas Initiative (3SI), “Wschó d Europy. Studia humanistyczno-społeczne”, no. 7, issue 2.

Finnemore M., Sikkink K. (1998), International Norm Dynamics and Political Change, “International Organization”, no. 52.

Grgić G., Kolar Đ., Bašić M. (2022), Infrastructure diplomacy and strategic signalling within the Three Seas Initiative, “Southeast European and Black Sea Studies”, no. 23, issue 2.

Hopf T. (1998), The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory, “International Security”, vol. 23, no. 1.

Jong Seung K., Yongdeog K. (2021), A Study on the Three Seas Initiative as a Emerging Regional Partnership in Eastern Europe, “Tonghap yureop yeon-gu”, no. 13, issue 2.

Kratochwil F. (1989), Rules, Norms and Decisions, On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Lebow R. N. (2008), Identity and International Relations, “International Relations”, vol. 22, no. 4.

Lorek A. M. (2021), A System for Securing the Durability and Effectiveness of the Three Seas Initiative, „Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne”, no. 3.

Onuf N. (2013), Making Sense, Making Worlds Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations, Routledge, London.

Orzelska-Stączek A. (2019), Inicjatywa Trójmorza w świetle teorii realizmu. Polityczne aspekty nowej formy współpracy dwunastu państw, „Sprawy Międzynarodowe”, no. 72, issue 1.

Orzelska-Stączek A. (2022), Od Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej ku Europie Środkowej: nazwa regionu w polskim dyskursie akademickim, in: Wschód Zachodu? Szukając tożsamości Europy Środkowej, ed. A. Orzelska-Stączek, ISP PAN, Warsaw.

Pawłuszko T. (2023), Trójmorze jako proces budowania regionu, in: T. Pawłuszko, et al., Trójmorze. Budowanie regionu, Institute of New Europe, Warsaw.

Popławski K., Jakóbowski J. (2020A), Building closer connections. The Three Seas region as an economic area, Polski Instytut Ekonomiczny, Warsaw.

Popławski K., Jakóbowski J. (2020B), Trójmorze jako odpowiedź Europy Środkowej na globalne i unijne wyzwania, „Sprawy Międzynarodowe”, no. 73, issue 2.

Ramdani S., La pandémie de Covid-19, un outil discursif au service des objectifs géopolitiques de l’Initiative des Trois Mers, in: L’Europe centrale face à la pandémie de Covid-19, ed. K. Torbicka, University of Warsaw, Warsaw.

Reginia-Zacharski J. (2020), Obszary bezpieczeństwa Inicjatywy Trójmorza, „Sprawy Międzynarodowe”, no. 73, issue 2.

Stark Urrestarazu U. (2015), ‘Identity’ in International Relations and Foreign Policy Theory, in: Theorizing Foreign Policy in a Globalized World, Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series, eds. G. Hellmann, K. E. Jørgensen, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Tamaki T. (2010), Identity Theorizing in International Theories, in: Deconstructing Japan’s Image of South Korea, ed. T. Tamaki, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

Tyrrell M. (2007), Homage to Ruritania: nationalism, identity, and diversity, “Critical Review”, vol. 19, no. 4.

Wendt A. (1992), Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics, “International Organization”, vol. 46, no. 2.

Wendt A. (1999), Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Wilczek J., Rudowski A. (2021), Fundusz Trójmorza. W stronę instytucjonalizacji Inicjatywy?, Warszawa.