Postulat uporządkowania prawa w Anonima “De rebus bellicis”

Main Article Content

Jacek Wiewiorowski

Abstrakt

Text discusses the Anonymus de rebus bellicis (DRB) - written in late 4th or early 5th century - proposals concerning the necessity to reform the ambiguity of  law (DRB XXI). Author gathers opinions of modern scholars about the value, limits and influence of DRB XXI in the matter of so called codification of Roman law in Late Antiquity, adding to it his own interpretation of its text (with first Polish translation of the fragment by dr Anna Kotłowska, IH AMU Poznań). He deduces that DRB was the isolated petition of private citizen, and his ideas concerning the reform of leges and iura had no ties with project of Theodosian Code or other initiatives to order Roman law in the period. Author concludes that the main value of DRB XXI is the idea of improvement of law by emperor as a way to make better the internal state affairs, what was unfamiliar to contemporaries before writing of this treatise.       

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Dział
Idee

Bibliografia

  1. Alexander J.J.G., Studies in Italian manuscript illumination, London 2002, s. 99–105.
  2. Alexander J.J.G., The illustrations of the Anonymus de rebus bellicis, [w:] M.W.C. Hassall (red.), De rebus bellicis: Part 1: Aspects of the De rebus bellicis. Papers presented to Professor E.A. Thompson. British Archaeological Reports — International Series, 63, Oxford 1979, s. 11–15.
  3. Baldwin B., The De rebus bellicis, Eirene 16, 1978, s. 23–39.
  4. Berger A., Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law, Philadelphia 1953.
  5. Berger P.C., The Insignia of the ‘Notitia Dignitatum’. A Contribution to the Study of the Late Antique Illustrated Manuscripts, New York–London 1981.
  6. Brodka D., Ideologiczne aspekty podręcznika wojskowości „Epitoma rei militaris” Wegecjusza, Meander 53, 1998, s. 383–389.
  7. Cameron A., The Date of the Anonymus de rebus bellicis, [w:] M.W.C. Hassall (red.), De rebus bellicis, s. 1–10 = [w:] A. Cameron, Literature and Society in the Early Byzantine World, London 1985, IX.
  8. Campbell B., Teach Yourself How to Be a General, Journal of Roman Studies 77, 1987, s. 13–29.
  9. Condorelli S. (red.), Riforme e tecnica nel “De rebus bellicis” (testo e commento e versione di S. Condorelli), Messina 1971.
  10. Fernández Cano A.C., La llamada “ley de citas” en su contexto histórico, Madrid 2000.
  11. Giardina A. (red.), Anonimo, Le cose della guerra, Milano 1989 (2. ed. 1996).
  12. Giuffre V., La lettura ‘de re militari’. Appunti per una storia degli ordinamenti militari, Napoli 1974, s. 105–125, zwłaszcza s. 114–– 116.
  13. Grigg R., Portrait-Bearing Codicils in the Illustration of the ‘Notitia Dignitatum’, Journal of Roman Studies 59, 1979, s. 107–124.
  14. Ireland R. (red.), Part 2., De Rebus Bellicis, BAR International Series 63, Oxford 1979.
  15. Ireland R., Anonymi auctoris De rebus Bellicis, Leipzig 1984.
  16. Jouffroy H., Traduction française de ‘De rebus bellicis’, [w:] Y. Le Bohec, C. Wolff (red.), L’armée romaine de Dioclétien á Valentinien Ier. Actes du Congrés de Lyon (12–14 septembre 2002), Paris 2004, s. 59–67.
  17. Lassandro D., Note sul De rebus bellicis, [w:] M. Sordi, Il pensiero sulla guerra nel mondo antico, Milano 2001, s. 243–251, zwłaszcza s. 243–244.
  18. Martindale J.R., Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire: Addenda et Corrigenda to Volume I, Historia 29, 1980, s. 497;
  19. Mazzarino S., Aspetti sociali del quarto secolo. Ricerche di storia tardo-romana, Roma 1951, zwłaszcza s. 72–.
  20. Paschoud F., Roma aeterna: études sur le patriotisme Romain dans l’occident latin a l’époque des grandes invasions, Rome 1967, s. 118–132.
  21. Pieler P.E., Rechtsliteratur, [w:] H. Hunger, Hochsprachliche profane literatur der Byzantiner, II, München 1978, s. 381–384.
  22. Plezia M. (red.), Słownik łacińsko-polski, V, Warszawa 1979.
  23. Reinach S., Un homme a projets du bas-empire, Revue Archeologique Ser. 5, 15, 1922, s. 205––265.
  24. Rodgers N., Rzymska armia. Legiony, wojny i kampanie, tłum. J. Jedliński, Warszawa 2009, s. 43.
  25. Sánchez-Ostiz Á. (red.), Anónimo Sobre Asuntos Militares, Pamplona 2004.
  26. Scharf R., Comites und comitiva primi ordinis, Mainz 1994, s. 38–55.
  27. Schneider R. (red.), Anonymi de rebus bellicis liber, Berlin 1908.
  28. Thompson E.A. (red.), A Roman Reformer and Inventor, being a new text of the treatise De Rebus Bellicis, with a translation and introduction by E.A. Thompson, Oxford 1952.